The impact of bird-beak configuration on aortic remodeling of distal arch pathology after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the zenith pro-form tx2 thoracic endograft

Hung Lung Hsu, Chun Ku Chen, Po Lin Chen, I. Min Chen, Chiao Po Hsu, Chih Wen Chen, Chun Che Shih

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

25 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Objective Structural changes and incomplete endograft apposition to the aortic arch (bird-beak configuration) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic changes, conformability, and angulation factors in patients who underwent stainless steel-based stent graft repair of thoracic aortic pathology. Methods From March 2011 to March 2012, the study enrolled 19 patients with aortic pathology requiring proximal fixation in zones 2 and 3 who underwent stent graft repair using Zenith Pro-Form TX2 stent grafts (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). For comparison, another 19 patients who received Zenith Z-Trak stent grafts were selected from December 2009 to February 2011. Chest computed tomography scans were analyzed at baseline, and then at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Arch angulation and bird-beak configuration were evaluated according to sealing zones of attachment by Aquarius iNtuition software (TeraRecon, San Mateo, Calif). Results The treated diseases included chronic type B aortic dissection in 17 patients and degenerative aneurysms in 21. Significant arch angle transformation was noted at the zone 2 level between the Pro-Form and Z-Trak treated groups (150 ± 11 vs 158 ± 6; P =.033) and left subclavian artery level (152 ± 12 vs 160 ± 8; P =.031) during 1 year of follow-up. The bird-beak configuration was detected in six patients (32%) in the Pro-Form group and in 11 (58%) in the Z-Trak group (P =.096) at 1 month, and in six (32%) in the Pro-Form group and in 14 (74%) in the Z-Trak group (P =.022) at 12 months. The mean bird-beak angle was significantly less in Pro-Form-treated patients at 1 month (5 ± 9 vs 15 ± 13; P =.019) and at 1 year (6 ± 10 vs 18 ± 15; P =.033). In the Pro-Form platform, a preoperative zone 2 angle <151.1 was a better estimation of the presence of a postoperative bird-beak configuration, with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 83%. Conclusions Aortic remodeling after stainless steel stent graft repair of thoracic aortic pathology is a continuous process. Significant arch angle transformation was discovered over the zone 2 and left subclavian artery levels. TX2 Pro-Form stent grafts improved arch conformation after 1 year of follow-up. Furthermore, in the patients with dissection, a preoperative distal arch angle of zone 2 was predictive of postoperative bird-beak configuration, regardless of whether they were treated with a Pro-Form stent graft.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)80-88
頁數9
期刊Journal of Vascular Surgery
59
發行號1
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 一月 1 2014
對外發佈Yes

指紋

Beak
Birds
Stents
Thorax
Pathology
Transplants
Subclavian Artery
Stainless Steel
Dissection
Intuition
Thoracic Aorta
Aneurysm
Chronic Disease
Software
Tomography
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

引用此文

The impact of bird-beak configuration on aortic remodeling of distal arch pathology after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the zenith pro-form tx2 thoracic endograft. / Hsu, Hung Lung; Chen, Chun Ku; Chen, Po Lin; Chen, I. Min; Hsu, Chiao Po; Chen, Chih Wen; Shih, Chun Che.

於: Journal of Vascular Surgery, 卷 59, 編號 1, 01.01.2014, p. 80-88.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

@article{e5161e5745fb41dc9fa653c3edaef2d2,
title = "The impact of bird-beak configuration on aortic remodeling of distal arch pathology after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the zenith pro-form tx2 thoracic endograft",
abstract = "Objective Structural changes and incomplete endograft apposition to the aortic arch (bird-beak configuration) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic changes, conformability, and angulation factors in patients who underwent stainless steel-based stent graft repair of thoracic aortic pathology. Methods From March 2011 to March 2012, the study enrolled 19 patients with aortic pathology requiring proximal fixation in zones 2 and 3 who underwent stent graft repair using Zenith Pro-Form TX2 stent grafts (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). For comparison, another 19 patients who received Zenith Z-Trak stent grafts were selected from December 2009 to February 2011. Chest computed tomography scans were analyzed at baseline, and then at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Arch angulation and bird-beak configuration were evaluated according to sealing zones of attachment by Aquarius iNtuition software (TeraRecon, San Mateo, Calif). Results The treated diseases included chronic type B aortic dissection in 17 patients and degenerative aneurysms in 21. Significant arch angle transformation was noted at the zone 2 level between the Pro-Form and Z-Trak treated groups (150 ± 11 vs 158 ± 6; P =.033) and left subclavian artery level (152 ± 12 vs 160 ± 8; P =.031) during 1 year of follow-up. The bird-beak configuration was detected in six patients (32{\%}) in the Pro-Form group and in 11 (58{\%}) in the Z-Trak group (P =.096) at 1 month, and in six (32{\%}) in the Pro-Form group and in 14 (74{\%}) in the Z-Trak group (P =.022) at 12 months. The mean bird-beak angle was significantly less in Pro-Form-treated patients at 1 month (5 ± 9 vs 15 ± 13; P =.019) and at 1 year (6 ± 10 vs 18 ± 15; P =.033). In the Pro-Form platform, a preoperative zone 2 angle <151.1 was a better estimation of the presence of a postoperative bird-beak configuration, with a sensitivity of 86{\%} and specificity of 83{\%}. Conclusions Aortic remodeling after stainless steel stent graft repair of thoracic aortic pathology is a continuous process. Significant arch angle transformation was discovered over the zone 2 and left subclavian artery levels. TX2 Pro-Form stent grafts improved arch conformation after 1 year of follow-up. Furthermore, in the patients with dissection, a preoperative distal arch angle of zone 2 was predictive of postoperative bird-beak configuration, regardless of whether they were treated with a Pro-Form stent graft.",
author = "Hsu, {Hung Lung} and Chen, {Chun Ku} and Chen, {Po Lin} and Chen, {I. Min} and Hsu, {Chiao Po} and Chen, {Chih Wen} and Shih, {Chun Che}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.098",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "80--88",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of bird-beak configuration on aortic remodeling of distal arch pathology after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the zenith pro-form tx2 thoracic endograft

AU - Hsu, Hung Lung

AU - Chen, Chun Ku

AU - Chen, Po Lin

AU - Chen, I. Min

AU - Hsu, Chiao Po

AU - Chen, Chih Wen

AU - Shih, Chun Che

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objective Structural changes and incomplete endograft apposition to the aortic arch (bird-beak configuration) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic changes, conformability, and angulation factors in patients who underwent stainless steel-based stent graft repair of thoracic aortic pathology. Methods From March 2011 to March 2012, the study enrolled 19 patients with aortic pathology requiring proximal fixation in zones 2 and 3 who underwent stent graft repair using Zenith Pro-Form TX2 stent grafts (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). For comparison, another 19 patients who received Zenith Z-Trak stent grafts were selected from December 2009 to February 2011. Chest computed tomography scans were analyzed at baseline, and then at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Arch angulation and bird-beak configuration were evaluated according to sealing zones of attachment by Aquarius iNtuition software (TeraRecon, San Mateo, Calif). Results The treated diseases included chronic type B aortic dissection in 17 patients and degenerative aneurysms in 21. Significant arch angle transformation was noted at the zone 2 level between the Pro-Form and Z-Trak treated groups (150 ± 11 vs 158 ± 6; P =.033) and left subclavian artery level (152 ± 12 vs 160 ± 8; P =.031) during 1 year of follow-up. The bird-beak configuration was detected in six patients (32%) in the Pro-Form group and in 11 (58%) in the Z-Trak group (P =.096) at 1 month, and in six (32%) in the Pro-Form group and in 14 (74%) in the Z-Trak group (P =.022) at 12 months. The mean bird-beak angle was significantly less in Pro-Form-treated patients at 1 month (5 ± 9 vs 15 ± 13; P =.019) and at 1 year (6 ± 10 vs 18 ± 15; P =.033). In the Pro-Form platform, a preoperative zone 2 angle <151.1 was a better estimation of the presence of a postoperative bird-beak configuration, with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 83%. Conclusions Aortic remodeling after stainless steel stent graft repair of thoracic aortic pathology is a continuous process. Significant arch angle transformation was discovered over the zone 2 and left subclavian artery levels. TX2 Pro-Form stent grafts improved arch conformation after 1 year of follow-up. Furthermore, in the patients with dissection, a preoperative distal arch angle of zone 2 was predictive of postoperative bird-beak configuration, regardless of whether they were treated with a Pro-Form stent graft.

AB - Objective Structural changes and incomplete endograft apposition to the aortic arch (bird-beak configuration) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic changes, conformability, and angulation factors in patients who underwent stainless steel-based stent graft repair of thoracic aortic pathology. Methods From March 2011 to March 2012, the study enrolled 19 patients with aortic pathology requiring proximal fixation in zones 2 and 3 who underwent stent graft repair using Zenith Pro-Form TX2 stent grafts (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). For comparison, another 19 patients who received Zenith Z-Trak stent grafts were selected from December 2009 to February 2011. Chest computed tomography scans were analyzed at baseline, and then at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Arch angulation and bird-beak configuration were evaluated according to sealing zones of attachment by Aquarius iNtuition software (TeraRecon, San Mateo, Calif). Results The treated diseases included chronic type B aortic dissection in 17 patients and degenerative aneurysms in 21. Significant arch angle transformation was noted at the zone 2 level between the Pro-Form and Z-Trak treated groups (150 ± 11 vs 158 ± 6; P =.033) and left subclavian artery level (152 ± 12 vs 160 ± 8; P =.031) during 1 year of follow-up. The bird-beak configuration was detected in six patients (32%) in the Pro-Form group and in 11 (58%) in the Z-Trak group (P =.096) at 1 month, and in six (32%) in the Pro-Form group and in 14 (74%) in the Z-Trak group (P =.022) at 12 months. The mean bird-beak angle was significantly less in Pro-Form-treated patients at 1 month (5 ± 9 vs 15 ± 13; P =.019) and at 1 year (6 ± 10 vs 18 ± 15; P =.033). In the Pro-Form platform, a preoperative zone 2 angle <151.1 was a better estimation of the presence of a postoperative bird-beak configuration, with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 83%. Conclusions Aortic remodeling after stainless steel stent graft repair of thoracic aortic pathology is a continuous process. Significant arch angle transformation was discovered over the zone 2 and left subclavian artery levels. TX2 Pro-Form stent grafts improved arch conformation after 1 year of follow-up. Furthermore, in the patients with dissection, a preoperative distal arch angle of zone 2 was predictive of postoperative bird-beak configuration, regardless of whether they were treated with a Pro-Form stent graft.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891627702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891627702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.098

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.098

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84891627702

VL - 59

SP - 80

EP - 88

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 1

ER -