The differences in health outcomes between Web-based and paper-based implementation of a clinical pathway for radical nephrectomy

P. L. Chang, Y. C. Li, S. H. Lee

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

15 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a web-based clinical pathway (WCP) for radical nephrectomy on patient care, and to compare the effects with those of a paper-based clinical pathway (PCP). Patients and methods: Patients with renal cell carcinoma and who underwent radical nephrectomy were enrolled into the study. The results of using the WCP for radical nephrectomy from July 2000 to August 2001 were compared with those using the PCP between May 1999 and June 2000. The mean hospital stay, average admission charges, six quality indicators, and the advantages of the WCP were determined. Results: Using a WCP for radical nephrectomy reduced the hospital stay and admission charges by as much as the PCP. A similar number of patients had variances from the WCP as with the PCP (P = 0.407), but the number of undetected variances and the variance detection time in the WCP were significantly less (P = 0.0193 and 0.0162). Implementing a WCP also improved the quality of care by as much as a PCP. Conclusions: Using a WCP for radical nephrectomy can improve health outcomes by reducing the hospital stay and admission charges, and by improving the quality of care by as much as a PCP. Furthermore, the WCP was more accurate and faster than the PCP in detecting variances.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)522-528
頁數7
期刊BJU International
90
發行號6
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 2002

指紋

Critical Pathways
Nephrectomy
Health
Length of Stay
Quality of Health Care
Renal Cell Carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

引用此文

The differences in health outcomes between Web-based and paper-based implementation of a clinical pathway for radical nephrectomy. / Chang, P. L.; Li, Y. C.; Lee, S. H.

於: BJU International, 卷 90, 編號 6, 2002, p. 522-528.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

@article{65e6b627854044fcb793c6f91f18dafa,
title = "The differences in health outcomes between Web-based and paper-based implementation of a clinical pathway for radical nephrectomy",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the effects of a web-based clinical pathway (WCP) for radical nephrectomy on patient care, and to compare the effects with those of a paper-based clinical pathway (PCP). Patients and methods: Patients with renal cell carcinoma and who underwent radical nephrectomy were enrolled into the study. The results of using the WCP for radical nephrectomy from July 2000 to August 2001 were compared with those using the PCP between May 1999 and June 2000. The mean hospital stay, average admission charges, six quality indicators, and the advantages of the WCP were determined. Results: Using a WCP for radical nephrectomy reduced the hospital stay and admission charges by as much as the PCP. A similar number of patients had variances from the WCP as with the PCP (P = 0.407), but the number of undetected variances and the variance detection time in the WCP were significantly less (P = 0.0193 and 0.0162). Implementing a WCP also improved the quality of care by as much as a PCP. Conclusions: Using a WCP for radical nephrectomy can improve health outcomes by reducing the hospital stay and admission charges, and by improving the quality of care by as much as a PCP. Furthermore, the WCP was more accurate and faster than the PCP in detecting variances.",
keywords = "Clinical pathway, Health outcome, Radical nephrectomy, Web-based",
author = "Chang, {P. L.} and Li, {Y. C.} and Lee, {S. H.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02980.x",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "522--528",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The differences in health outcomes between Web-based and paper-based implementation of a clinical pathway for radical nephrectomy

AU - Chang, P. L.

AU - Li, Y. C.

AU - Lee, S. H.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the effects of a web-based clinical pathway (WCP) for radical nephrectomy on patient care, and to compare the effects with those of a paper-based clinical pathway (PCP). Patients and methods: Patients with renal cell carcinoma and who underwent radical nephrectomy were enrolled into the study. The results of using the WCP for radical nephrectomy from July 2000 to August 2001 were compared with those using the PCP between May 1999 and June 2000. The mean hospital stay, average admission charges, six quality indicators, and the advantages of the WCP were determined. Results: Using a WCP for radical nephrectomy reduced the hospital stay and admission charges by as much as the PCP. A similar number of patients had variances from the WCP as with the PCP (P = 0.407), but the number of undetected variances and the variance detection time in the WCP were significantly less (P = 0.0193 and 0.0162). Implementing a WCP also improved the quality of care by as much as a PCP. Conclusions: Using a WCP for radical nephrectomy can improve health outcomes by reducing the hospital stay and admission charges, and by improving the quality of care by as much as a PCP. Furthermore, the WCP was more accurate and faster than the PCP in detecting variances.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the effects of a web-based clinical pathway (WCP) for radical nephrectomy on patient care, and to compare the effects with those of a paper-based clinical pathway (PCP). Patients and methods: Patients with renal cell carcinoma and who underwent radical nephrectomy were enrolled into the study. The results of using the WCP for radical nephrectomy from July 2000 to August 2001 were compared with those using the PCP between May 1999 and June 2000. The mean hospital stay, average admission charges, six quality indicators, and the advantages of the WCP were determined. Results: Using a WCP for radical nephrectomy reduced the hospital stay and admission charges by as much as the PCP. A similar number of patients had variances from the WCP as with the PCP (P = 0.407), but the number of undetected variances and the variance detection time in the WCP were significantly less (P = 0.0193 and 0.0162). Implementing a WCP also improved the quality of care by as much as a PCP. Conclusions: Using a WCP for radical nephrectomy can improve health outcomes by reducing the hospital stay and admission charges, and by improving the quality of care by as much as a PCP. Furthermore, the WCP was more accurate and faster than the PCP in detecting variances.

KW - Clinical pathway

KW - Health outcome

KW - Radical nephrectomy

KW - Web-based

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036379801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036379801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02980.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02980.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 12230609

AN - SCOPUS:0036379801

VL - 90

SP - 522

EP - 528

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 6

ER -