Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan

Hei Fen Hwang, Wen Miin Liang, Yun Ning Chiu, Mau Roung Lin

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

91 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Background: While life expectancy among older people has been lengthened due to improved public health and medical interventions, the importance of health-related quality of life in later life has also increased. However, the application of a generic health-related quality of life measure for older people needs to be carefully validated. Objective: To evaluate the practicality, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the use of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life for people aged 65 years or older. Design: A prospective study. Methods: For a baseline assessment, 1200 community-dwelling older people living in Shin-Sher Township of Taichung County, Taiwan, completed the brief version of World Health Organization Quality of Life at their residences either by themselves or with the assistance of an interviewer. Furthermore, score changes in each health-related quality of life domain after a fall were followed up for assessing its responsiveness. Results: The average length of time required to complete the questionnaire was short (10.6 minutes for self-administration and 15.3 minutes for personal interview), and the score distribution in each domain was symmetrical with no floor or ceiling effect. Furthermore, all domain scores indicated excellent discriminant validity, construct validity, and responsiveness as well as good internal consistency and intra- and inter-observer test-retest reliabilities. Nevertheless, two items related to work capacity and sexual activity had higher missing values (4.5% and 16.5%) and poor interobserver test-retest reliabilities (0.43 and 0.20). Suggested modifications to the two items for older people are discussed. Conclusion: With a few modifications, the brief World Health Organization Quality of Life is a suitable health-related quality of life instrument for older people.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)593-600
頁數8
期刊Age and Ageing
32
發行號6
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 十一月 2003

指紋

Independent Living
Taiwan
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Interviews
Self Administration
Life Expectancy
Sexual Behavior
Public Health
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ageing

引用此文

Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan. / Hwang, Hei Fen; Liang, Wen Miin; Chiu, Yun Ning; Lin, Mau Roung.

於: Age and Ageing, 卷 32, 編號 6, 11.2003, p. 593-600.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

Hwang, Hei Fen ; Liang, Wen Miin ; Chiu, Yun Ning ; Lin, Mau Roung. / Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan. 於: Age and Ageing. 2003 ; 卷 32, 編號 6. 頁 593-600.
@article{1cd43cabaa9a43a7b38f84d1eee2d445,
title = "Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan",
abstract = "Background: While life expectancy among older people has been lengthened due to improved public health and medical interventions, the importance of health-related quality of life in later life has also increased. However, the application of a generic health-related quality of life measure for older people needs to be carefully validated. Objective: To evaluate the practicality, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the use of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life for people aged 65 years or older. Design: A prospective study. Methods: For a baseline assessment, 1200 community-dwelling older people living in Shin-Sher Township of Taichung County, Taiwan, completed the brief version of World Health Organization Quality of Life at their residences either by themselves or with the assistance of an interviewer. Furthermore, score changes in each health-related quality of life domain after a fall were followed up for assessing its responsiveness. Results: The average length of time required to complete the questionnaire was short (10.6 minutes for self-administration and 15.3 minutes for personal interview), and the score distribution in each domain was symmetrical with no floor or ceiling effect. Furthermore, all domain scores indicated excellent discriminant validity, construct validity, and responsiveness as well as good internal consistency and intra- and inter-observer test-retest reliabilities. Nevertheless, two items related to work capacity and sexual activity had higher missing values (4.5{\%} and 16.5{\%}) and poor interobserver test-retest reliabilities (0.43 and 0.20). Suggested modifications to the two items for older people are discussed. Conclusion: With a few modifications, the brief World Health Organization Quality of Life is a suitable health-related quality of life instrument for older people.",
keywords = "Health-related quality of life, Older people, Psychometrics, Taiwan, WHOQOL-BREF",
author = "Hwang, {Hei Fen} and Liang, {Wen Miin} and Chiu, {Yun Ning} and Lin, {Mau Roung}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1093/ageing/afg102",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "593--600",
journal = "Age and Ageing",
issn = "0002-0729",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan

AU - Hwang, Hei Fen

AU - Liang, Wen Miin

AU - Chiu, Yun Ning

AU - Lin, Mau Roung

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - Background: While life expectancy among older people has been lengthened due to improved public health and medical interventions, the importance of health-related quality of life in later life has also increased. However, the application of a generic health-related quality of life measure for older people needs to be carefully validated. Objective: To evaluate the practicality, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the use of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life for people aged 65 years or older. Design: A prospective study. Methods: For a baseline assessment, 1200 community-dwelling older people living in Shin-Sher Township of Taichung County, Taiwan, completed the brief version of World Health Organization Quality of Life at their residences either by themselves or with the assistance of an interviewer. Furthermore, score changes in each health-related quality of life domain after a fall were followed up for assessing its responsiveness. Results: The average length of time required to complete the questionnaire was short (10.6 minutes for self-administration and 15.3 minutes for personal interview), and the score distribution in each domain was symmetrical with no floor or ceiling effect. Furthermore, all domain scores indicated excellent discriminant validity, construct validity, and responsiveness as well as good internal consistency and intra- and inter-observer test-retest reliabilities. Nevertheless, two items related to work capacity and sexual activity had higher missing values (4.5% and 16.5%) and poor interobserver test-retest reliabilities (0.43 and 0.20). Suggested modifications to the two items for older people are discussed. Conclusion: With a few modifications, the brief World Health Organization Quality of Life is a suitable health-related quality of life instrument for older people.

AB - Background: While life expectancy among older people has been lengthened due to improved public health and medical interventions, the importance of health-related quality of life in later life has also increased. However, the application of a generic health-related quality of life measure for older people needs to be carefully validated. Objective: To evaluate the practicality, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the use of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life for people aged 65 years or older. Design: A prospective study. Methods: For a baseline assessment, 1200 community-dwelling older people living in Shin-Sher Township of Taichung County, Taiwan, completed the brief version of World Health Organization Quality of Life at their residences either by themselves or with the assistance of an interviewer. Furthermore, score changes in each health-related quality of life domain after a fall were followed up for assessing its responsiveness. Results: The average length of time required to complete the questionnaire was short (10.6 minutes for self-administration and 15.3 minutes for personal interview), and the score distribution in each domain was symmetrical with no floor or ceiling effect. Furthermore, all domain scores indicated excellent discriminant validity, construct validity, and responsiveness as well as good internal consistency and intra- and inter-observer test-retest reliabilities. Nevertheless, two items related to work capacity and sexual activity had higher missing values (4.5% and 16.5%) and poor interobserver test-retest reliabilities (0.43 and 0.20). Suggested modifications to the two items for older people are discussed. Conclusion: With a few modifications, the brief World Health Organization Quality of Life is a suitable health-related quality of life instrument for older people.

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Older people

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Taiwan

KW - WHOQOL-BREF

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345328754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345328754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ageing/afg102

DO - 10.1093/ageing/afg102

M3 - Article

C2 - 14599999

AN - SCOPUS:0345328754

VL - 32

SP - 593

EP - 600

JO - Age and Ageing

JF - Age and Ageing

SN - 0002-0729

IS - 6

ER -