Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster

Jung Chun Ho, Shu Fen Kao, Jung Der Wang, Chien Tien Su, Chiao Tzu Patricia Lee, Ruey Yu Chen, Hung Lun Chang, Marco C F Ieong, Peter Wushou Chang

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

15 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

After the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, an international review of nuclear safety indicated that two of the three nuclear power plants (NPPs) operating in Taiwan were listed as the most dangerous in the world. To understand the perception of NPP risks by the public in Taiwan and their attitudes regarding a planned fourth NPP after the Fukushima nuclear incident in 2011, a study was conducted in August 2011. A sample of 2819 individuals responded to the survey, with 66% perceiving that Taiwan's safety management of NPPs was inferior to Japan's, while 40% perceived a higher possibility of nuclear accidents like that in Japan. On average, a 'safe' distance of 94 km from an NPP was expected. 56% opposed the planned fourth NPP, with females (adjusted odd ratios (aOR) 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.41), residence near the planned fourth NPP (aOR/CI 13.90/7.79-24.80), distrust of safety management (aOR/CI 1.98/1.45-2.69) and emergency planning (aOR/CI 1.89/1.49-2.40) as the main determinants. Others included those who expected larger safe distances from an NPP (trend test, p < 0.001), perceived excess cancer risks of living within 30 km of an NPP (aOR/CI 2.74/2.02-3.71), and projection of no electric shortage without NPPs (aOR/CI 1.93/1.50-2.49). Given that Taiwan's large population lives close to the existing NPPs and long-term concerns about the safety of these nuclear plants, the Fukushima incident in Japan likely augmented public risk perceptions on nuclear power in general and on the planned fourth NPP.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)773-789
頁數17
期刊Journal of Radiological Protection
33
發行號4
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 十二月 2013

指紋

Nuclear Power Plants
risk perception
Disasters
nuclear power plant
Taiwan
risk factor
disaster
confidence interval
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Safety Management
Japan
safety
Fukushima Nuclear Accident
Radioactive Hazard Release
nuclear accident
Safety
nuclear power

Keywords

  • Fukushima nuclear disasters
  • Nuclear plant
  • Risk perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Medicine(all)

引用此文

Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. / Ho, Jung Chun; Kao, Shu Fen; Wang, Jung Der; Su, Chien Tien; Lee, Chiao Tzu Patricia; Chen, Ruey Yu; Chang, Hung Lun; Ieong, Marco C F; Chang, Peter Wushou.

於: Journal of Radiological Protection, 卷 33, 編號 4, 12.2013, p. 773-789.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

Ho, Jung Chun ; Kao, Shu Fen ; Wang, Jung Der ; Su, Chien Tien ; Lee, Chiao Tzu Patricia ; Chen, Ruey Yu ; Chang, Hung Lun ; Ieong, Marco C F ; Chang, Peter Wushou. / Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. 於: Journal of Radiological Protection. 2013 ; 卷 33, 編號 4. 頁 773-789.
@article{e9d381886f0646aa8dcd5835fedeaa81,
title = "Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster",
abstract = "After the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, an international review of nuclear safety indicated that two of the three nuclear power plants (NPPs) operating in Taiwan were listed as the most dangerous in the world. To understand the perception of NPP risks by the public in Taiwan and their attitudes regarding a planned fourth NPP after the Fukushima nuclear incident in 2011, a study was conducted in August 2011. A sample of 2819 individuals responded to the survey, with 66{\%} perceiving that Taiwan's safety management of NPPs was inferior to Japan's, while 40{\%} perceived a higher possibility of nuclear accidents like that in Japan. On average, a 'safe' distance of 94 km from an NPP was expected. 56{\%} opposed the planned fourth NPP, with females (adjusted odd ratios (aOR) 2.03; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.41), residence near the planned fourth NPP (aOR/CI 13.90/7.79-24.80), distrust of safety management (aOR/CI 1.98/1.45-2.69) and emergency planning (aOR/CI 1.89/1.49-2.40) as the main determinants. Others included those who expected larger safe distances from an NPP (trend test, p <0.001), perceived excess cancer risks of living within 30 km of an NPP (aOR/CI 2.74/2.02-3.71), and projection of no electric shortage without NPPs (aOR/CI 1.93/1.50-2.49). Given that Taiwan's large population lives close to the existing NPPs and long-term concerns about the safety of these nuclear plants, the Fukushima incident in Japan likely augmented public risk perceptions on nuclear power in general and on the planned fourth NPP.",
keywords = "Fukushima nuclear disasters, Nuclear plant, Risk perception, Fukushima nuclear disasters, Nuclear plant, Risk perception",
author = "Ho, {Jung Chun} and Kao, {Shu Fen} and Wang, {Jung Der} and Su, {Chien Tien} and Lee, {Chiao Tzu Patricia} and Chen, {Ruey Yu} and Chang, {Hung Lun} and Ieong, {Marco C F} and Chang, {Peter Wushou}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1088/0952-4746/33/4/773",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "773--789",
journal = "Journal of Radiological Protection",
issn = "0952-4746",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster

AU - Ho, Jung Chun

AU - Kao, Shu Fen

AU - Wang, Jung Der

AU - Su, Chien Tien

AU - Lee, Chiao Tzu Patricia

AU - Chen, Ruey Yu

AU - Chang, Hung Lun

AU - Ieong, Marco C F

AU - Chang, Peter Wushou

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - After the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, an international review of nuclear safety indicated that two of the three nuclear power plants (NPPs) operating in Taiwan were listed as the most dangerous in the world. To understand the perception of NPP risks by the public in Taiwan and their attitudes regarding a planned fourth NPP after the Fukushima nuclear incident in 2011, a study was conducted in August 2011. A sample of 2819 individuals responded to the survey, with 66% perceiving that Taiwan's safety management of NPPs was inferior to Japan's, while 40% perceived a higher possibility of nuclear accidents like that in Japan. On average, a 'safe' distance of 94 km from an NPP was expected. 56% opposed the planned fourth NPP, with females (adjusted odd ratios (aOR) 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.41), residence near the planned fourth NPP (aOR/CI 13.90/7.79-24.80), distrust of safety management (aOR/CI 1.98/1.45-2.69) and emergency planning (aOR/CI 1.89/1.49-2.40) as the main determinants. Others included those who expected larger safe distances from an NPP (trend test, p <0.001), perceived excess cancer risks of living within 30 km of an NPP (aOR/CI 2.74/2.02-3.71), and projection of no electric shortage without NPPs (aOR/CI 1.93/1.50-2.49). Given that Taiwan's large population lives close to the existing NPPs and long-term concerns about the safety of these nuclear plants, the Fukushima incident in Japan likely augmented public risk perceptions on nuclear power in general and on the planned fourth NPP.

AB - After the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, an international review of nuclear safety indicated that two of the three nuclear power plants (NPPs) operating in Taiwan were listed as the most dangerous in the world. To understand the perception of NPP risks by the public in Taiwan and their attitudes regarding a planned fourth NPP after the Fukushima nuclear incident in 2011, a study was conducted in August 2011. A sample of 2819 individuals responded to the survey, with 66% perceiving that Taiwan's safety management of NPPs was inferior to Japan's, while 40% perceived a higher possibility of nuclear accidents like that in Japan. On average, a 'safe' distance of 94 km from an NPP was expected. 56% opposed the planned fourth NPP, with females (adjusted odd ratios (aOR) 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.41), residence near the planned fourth NPP (aOR/CI 13.90/7.79-24.80), distrust of safety management (aOR/CI 1.98/1.45-2.69) and emergency planning (aOR/CI 1.89/1.49-2.40) as the main determinants. Others included those who expected larger safe distances from an NPP (trend test, p <0.001), perceived excess cancer risks of living within 30 km of an NPP (aOR/CI 2.74/2.02-3.71), and projection of no electric shortage without NPPs (aOR/CI 1.93/1.50-2.49). Given that Taiwan's large population lives close to the existing NPPs and long-term concerns about the safety of these nuclear plants, the Fukushima incident in Japan likely augmented public risk perceptions on nuclear power in general and on the planned fourth NPP.

KW - Fukushima nuclear disasters

KW - Nuclear plant

KW - Risk perception

KW - Fukushima nuclear disasters

KW - Nuclear plant

KW - Risk perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889671351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889671351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0952-4746/33/4/773

DO - 10.1088/0952-4746/33/4/773

M3 - Article

C2 - 24048022

AN - SCOPUS:84889671351

VL - 33

SP - 773

EP - 789

JO - Journal of Radiological Protection

JF - Journal of Radiological Protection

SN - 0952-4746

IS - 4

ER -