Relationship between the distribution of cefepime minimum inhibitory concentrations and detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production among clinically important Enterobacteriaceae isolates obtained from patients in intensive care units in Taiwan: Results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2007

ShioShin Jean, Wen-Sen Lee, Kuan-Jen Bai, Carlos Lam, Chin-Wung Hsu, Kwok Woon Yu, Chun Hsing Liao, Feng Yi Chang, Wen Chien Ko, Jiunn Jong Wu, Yen Hsu Chen, Yao Shen Chen, Jien Wei Liu, Min Chi Lu, Cheng Yi Liu, Ray-Jade Chen, Po Ren Hsueh

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

10 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Background: The data on susceptibility of important cephalosporins against four Enterobacteriaceae members producing potential extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) collected from Taiwanese intensive care units are lacking. Methods: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefepime were determined using agar dilution method, against Escherichia coli (n=344), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=359), Enterobacter cloacae (n=103), and Proteus mirabilis (n=78). Susceptibilities of these isolates to three cephalosporins were assessed according to MIC breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) in 2013. The double-disk synergy test using disks containing cefepime (30μg) with or without clavulanate (10μg) was applied to confirm production of ESBL for isolates with cephalosporin MIC≥2μg/mL. Results: A total of 175 isolates were verified as ESBL producers. The rates of cefepime susceptibility among the ESBL-producing isolates, according to CLSI (EUCAST) criteria, were 56.7% (22.4%) for E. coli, 61.3% (12.0%) for K. pneumoniae, 57.9% (31.6%) for E. cloacae, and 71.4% (7.1%) for P. mirabilis. Using different cefepime MIC breakpoints (MICs≥16μg/mL recommended by CLSI criteria and ≥2μg/mL by EUCAST criteria) to define nonsusceptibility, we found that both criteria were poorer at predicting ESBL producers among K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae than among the other two species. In addition, we also found that the cefepime MIC level of 1.0μg/mL best distinguished non-ESBL- from ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae. Conclusion: To detect ESBLs, CLSI should revise the cefepime MIC breakpoint against Enterobacteriaceae.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)85-91
頁數7
期刊Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
48
發行號1
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 二月 1 2015

    指紋

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Medicine(all)

引用此