Measurement of resilience potentials in emergency departments: Applications of a tailored resilience assessment grid

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

摘要

A proxy measurement of four resilience potentials (respond, monitor, learn, and anticipate) developed by Hollnagel is called the resilience assessment grid (RAG). This study aimed to attain an enhanced understanding of the resilience performance of emergency departments (EDs) in terms of the four potentials across hospitals through the adoption of a custom-made RAG (ED-RAG). The study setting was four hospitals. The ED-RAG questionnaire was used to interview focus groups at the four EDs from February to June 2015. All interviews were led by the lead researcher and the interview transcripts were evaluated using the ED-RAG four-point scoring scale. Four radar charts of individual resilience potentials and a star chart presenting a system's potential of overall resilience performance for each hospital's ED were generated. The charts provide visualized results that indicate clear directions for making improvement plans toward resilience in EDs. Overall, all EDs exhibited considerable potential to learn compared with the other three potentials at the time of measurement. Common strengths and weaknesses with respect to developing the four potentials were identified. Besides, no association between potential scores and staffing capacity, and no significant differences of resilience performance between hospital types were found. EDs’ ability to perform in a resilient manner can be critical under considerable uncertainty and economic pressure. The study revealed essential knowledge about the development of resilience potentials in emergence departments among hospitals. The findings could contribute to the promotion of resilient health care.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)385-393
頁數9
期刊Safety Science
121
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 一月 1 2020

指紋

resilience
Hospital Emergency Service
Hospital Departments
Interviews
Health care
Stars
Radar
interview
Economics
Proxy
Health Promotion
Focus Groups
performance
Uncertainty
staffing
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Pressure
promotion
uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Safety Research
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

引用此文

@article{adfe2093a77044499899a2e14cbb1520,
title = "Measurement of resilience potentials in emergency departments: Applications of a tailored resilience assessment grid",
abstract = "A proxy measurement of four resilience potentials (respond, monitor, learn, and anticipate) developed by Hollnagel is called the resilience assessment grid (RAG). This study aimed to attain an enhanced understanding of the resilience performance of emergency departments (EDs) in terms of the four potentials across hospitals through the adoption of a custom-made RAG (ED-RAG). The study setting was four hospitals. The ED-RAG questionnaire was used to interview focus groups at the four EDs from February to June 2015. All interviews were led by the lead researcher and the interview transcripts were evaluated using the ED-RAG four-point scoring scale. Four radar charts of individual resilience potentials and a star chart presenting a system's potential of overall resilience performance for each hospital's ED were generated. The charts provide visualized results that indicate clear directions for making improvement plans toward resilience in EDs. Overall, all EDs exhibited considerable potential to learn compared with the other three potentials at the time of measurement. Common strengths and weaknesses with respect to developing the four potentials were identified. Besides, no association between potential scores and staffing capacity, and no significant differences of resilience performance between hospital types were found. EDs’ ability to perform in a resilient manner can be critical under considerable uncertainty and economic pressure. The study revealed essential knowledge about the development of resilience potentials in emergence departments among hospitals. The findings could contribute to the promotion of resilient health care.",
keywords = "ED-RAG, Emergency department, Resilience assessment grid (RAG), Resilient health care",
author = "Sheuwen Chuang and Ou, {Ju Chi} and Ma, {Hon Ping}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.012",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "385--393",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of resilience potentials in emergency departments

T2 - Applications of a tailored resilience assessment grid

AU - Chuang, Sheuwen

AU - Ou, Ju Chi

AU - Ma, Hon Ping

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - A proxy measurement of four resilience potentials (respond, monitor, learn, and anticipate) developed by Hollnagel is called the resilience assessment grid (RAG). This study aimed to attain an enhanced understanding of the resilience performance of emergency departments (EDs) in terms of the four potentials across hospitals through the adoption of a custom-made RAG (ED-RAG). The study setting was four hospitals. The ED-RAG questionnaire was used to interview focus groups at the four EDs from February to June 2015. All interviews were led by the lead researcher and the interview transcripts were evaluated using the ED-RAG four-point scoring scale. Four radar charts of individual resilience potentials and a star chart presenting a system's potential of overall resilience performance for each hospital's ED were generated. The charts provide visualized results that indicate clear directions for making improvement plans toward resilience in EDs. Overall, all EDs exhibited considerable potential to learn compared with the other three potentials at the time of measurement. Common strengths and weaknesses with respect to developing the four potentials were identified. Besides, no association between potential scores and staffing capacity, and no significant differences of resilience performance between hospital types were found. EDs’ ability to perform in a resilient manner can be critical under considerable uncertainty and economic pressure. The study revealed essential knowledge about the development of resilience potentials in emergence departments among hospitals. The findings could contribute to the promotion of resilient health care.

AB - A proxy measurement of four resilience potentials (respond, monitor, learn, and anticipate) developed by Hollnagel is called the resilience assessment grid (RAG). This study aimed to attain an enhanced understanding of the resilience performance of emergency departments (EDs) in terms of the four potentials across hospitals through the adoption of a custom-made RAG (ED-RAG). The study setting was four hospitals. The ED-RAG questionnaire was used to interview focus groups at the four EDs from February to June 2015. All interviews were led by the lead researcher and the interview transcripts were evaluated using the ED-RAG four-point scoring scale. Four radar charts of individual resilience potentials and a star chart presenting a system's potential of overall resilience performance for each hospital's ED were generated. The charts provide visualized results that indicate clear directions for making improvement plans toward resilience in EDs. Overall, all EDs exhibited considerable potential to learn compared with the other three potentials at the time of measurement. Common strengths and weaknesses with respect to developing the four potentials were identified. Besides, no association between potential scores and staffing capacity, and no significant differences of resilience performance between hospital types were found. EDs’ ability to perform in a resilient manner can be critical under considerable uncertainty and economic pressure. The study revealed essential knowledge about the development of resilience potentials in emergence departments among hospitals. The findings could contribute to the promotion of resilient health care.

KW - ED-RAG

KW - Emergency department

KW - Resilience assessment grid (RAG)

KW - Resilient health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072570065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072570065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072570065

VL - 121

SP - 385

EP - 393

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

ER -