Limited low-air insufflation is optimal for colonoscopy

Yu Hsi Hsieh, Kuo Chih Tseng, Hwai Jeng Lin

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

3 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Background: Air insufflation is essential in routine colonoscopy, but obtaining optimal insufflation levels has not been discussed in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine optimal air insufflation during colonoscopic examination. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomized to receive high-air insufflation (group A, n = 83), low-air insufflation (group B, n = 84), or low-air insufflation limited to the rectum and sigmoid colon (group C, n = 83). Completion rate, cecal intubation time, propofol dose, need for abdominal compression, and turning of patients, were evaluated. The post-procedure abdominal bloating was assessed with a 0-10 visual analog scale. Results: The completion rates were similar among the three groups. The cecal intubation time was significantly shorter in group C than in group B (4.1 ± 1.7 min vs. 5.2 ± 3.0 min, mean ± SD, p = 0.005). The dose of propofol was significantly less in group C than in group A (11.7 ± 3.2 mg vs. 12.7 ± 3.6 mg, mean ± SD, p = 0.045). Group C needed the least manual abdominal compression (group A, B, and C: 81.9, 69, and 59%, respectively, p = 0.005) and had the least post-procedure abdominal bloating (group A, B, and C: 2.2 ± 2.4, 2.2 ± 2.1, and 1.5 ± 1.9, respectively, p = 0.04). Conclusions: We found that limited use of low-air insufflation in the rectum and sigmoid is the procedure of choice for colonoscopic examination.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)2035-2042
頁數8
期刊Digestive Diseases and Sciences
55
發行號7
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 七月 2010
對外發佈Yes

指紋

Insufflation
Colonoscopy
Air
Sigmoid Colon
Propofol
Rectum
Intubation
Visual Analog Scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Physiology

引用此文

Limited low-air insufflation is optimal for colonoscopy. / Hsieh, Yu Hsi; Tseng, Kuo Chih; Lin, Hwai Jeng.

於: Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 卷 55, 編號 7, 07.2010, p. 2035-2042.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

Hsieh, Yu Hsi ; Tseng, Kuo Chih ; Lin, Hwai Jeng. / Limited low-air insufflation is optimal for colonoscopy. 於: Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2010 ; 卷 55, 編號 7. 頁 2035-2042.
@article{666bb7dfaedc4225b86c431ec3efe139,
title = "Limited low-air insufflation is optimal for colonoscopy",
abstract = "Background: Air insufflation is essential in routine colonoscopy, but obtaining optimal insufflation levels has not been discussed in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine optimal air insufflation during colonoscopic examination. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomized to receive high-air insufflation (group A, n = 83), low-air insufflation (group B, n = 84), or low-air insufflation limited to the rectum and sigmoid colon (group C, n = 83). Completion rate, cecal intubation time, propofol dose, need for abdominal compression, and turning of patients, were evaluated. The post-procedure abdominal bloating was assessed with a 0-10 visual analog scale. Results: The completion rates were similar among the three groups. The cecal intubation time was significantly shorter in group C than in group B (4.1 ± 1.7 min vs. 5.2 ± 3.0 min, mean ± SD, p = 0.005). The dose of propofol was significantly less in group C than in group A (11.7 ± 3.2 mg vs. 12.7 ± 3.6 mg, mean ± SD, p = 0.045). Group C needed the least manual abdominal compression (group A, B, and C: 81.9, 69, and 59{\%}, respectively, p = 0.005) and had the least post-procedure abdominal bloating (group A, B, and C: 2.2 ± 2.4, 2.2 ± 2.1, and 1.5 ± 1.9, respectively, p = 0.04). Conclusions: We found that limited use of low-air insufflation in the rectum and sigmoid is the procedure of choice for colonoscopic examination.",
keywords = "Air pressure, Colonoscopy, Intubation time, Propofol",
author = "Hsieh, {Yu Hsi} and Tseng, {Kuo Chih} and Lin, {Hwai Jeng}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10620-010-1210-9",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "2035--2042",
journal = "Digestive Diseases and Sciences",
issn = "0163-2116",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limited low-air insufflation is optimal for colonoscopy

AU - Hsieh, Yu Hsi

AU - Tseng, Kuo Chih

AU - Lin, Hwai Jeng

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Background: Air insufflation is essential in routine colonoscopy, but obtaining optimal insufflation levels has not been discussed in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine optimal air insufflation during colonoscopic examination. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomized to receive high-air insufflation (group A, n = 83), low-air insufflation (group B, n = 84), or low-air insufflation limited to the rectum and sigmoid colon (group C, n = 83). Completion rate, cecal intubation time, propofol dose, need for abdominal compression, and turning of patients, were evaluated. The post-procedure abdominal bloating was assessed with a 0-10 visual analog scale. Results: The completion rates were similar among the three groups. The cecal intubation time was significantly shorter in group C than in group B (4.1 ± 1.7 min vs. 5.2 ± 3.0 min, mean ± SD, p = 0.005). The dose of propofol was significantly less in group C than in group A (11.7 ± 3.2 mg vs. 12.7 ± 3.6 mg, mean ± SD, p = 0.045). Group C needed the least manual abdominal compression (group A, B, and C: 81.9, 69, and 59%, respectively, p = 0.005) and had the least post-procedure abdominal bloating (group A, B, and C: 2.2 ± 2.4, 2.2 ± 2.1, and 1.5 ± 1.9, respectively, p = 0.04). Conclusions: We found that limited use of low-air insufflation in the rectum and sigmoid is the procedure of choice for colonoscopic examination.

AB - Background: Air insufflation is essential in routine colonoscopy, but obtaining optimal insufflation levels has not been discussed in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine optimal air insufflation during colonoscopic examination. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomized to receive high-air insufflation (group A, n = 83), low-air insufflation (group B, n = 84), or low-air insufflation limited to the rectum and sigmoid colon (group C, n = 83). Completion rate, cecal intubation time, propofol dose, need for abdominal compression, and turning of patients, were evaluated. The post-procedure abdominal bloating was assessed with a 0-10 visual analog scale. Results: The completion rates were similar among the three groups. The cecal intubation time was significantly shorter in group C than in group B (4.1 ± 1.7 min vs. 5.2 ± 3.0 min, mean ± SD, p = 0.005). The dose of propofol was significantly less in group C than in group A (11.7 ± 3.2 mg vs. 12.7 ± 3.6 mg, mean ± SD, p = 0.045). Group C needed the least manual abdominal compression (group A, B, and C: 81.9, 69, and 59%, respectively, p = 0.005) and had the least post-procedure abdominal bloating (group A, B, and C: 2.2 ± 2.4, 2.2 ± 2.1, and 1.5 ± 1.9, respectively, p = 0.04). Conclusions: We found that limited use of low-air insufflation in the rectum and sigmoid is the procedure of choice for colonoscopic examination.

KW - Air pressure

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Intubation time

KW - Propofol

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954424821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954424821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10620-010-1210-9

DO - 10.1007/s10620-010-1210-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 20411425

AN - SCOPUS:77954424821

VL - 55

SP - 2035

EP - 2042

JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

SN - 0163-2116

IS - 7

ER -