Incremental Healthcare Service Utilization for Open-angle Glaucoma: A Population-Based Study

Shiu Dong Chung, Jau Der Ho, Herng Ching Lin, Li Ting Kao, Ming Chieh Tsai

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

4 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Purpose: To investigate differences in the utilization of healthcare services between subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and comparison subjects without OAG using Taiwan's National Health Insurance population-based database. Patients and Methods: The study comprised 2204 subjects with OAG and 2204 sex-matched and age-matched subjects without OAG. We individually followed each subject for a 1-year period to evaluate their healthcare resource utilization. Outcome variables of the healthcare resource utilization were as follows: numbers of outpatient visits and inpatient days and the mean costs of outpatient and inpatient treatment. In addition, we divided healthcare resource utilization into ophthalmologic and nonophthalmologic services. Results: As for the utilization of ophthalmologic services, OAG subjects had significantly more outpatient visits (7.4 vs. 1.3, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient costs (US$272 vs. US$39, P <0.001) than comparison subjects. For nonophthalmologic services, OAG subjects also had significantly more outpatient visits (29.4 vs. 21.8, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient costs (US$1263 vs. US$847, P <0.001) than comparison subjects. Furthermore, OAG subjects incurred significantly higher inpatient costs compared with comparison subjects (US$434 vs. US$234, P <0.001). For all healthcare services, OAG subjects had significantly more outpatient visits (36.8 vs. 23.1, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient (US$1535 vs. US$887, P <0.001) and total (US$2245 vs. US$1122, P <0.001) costs than comparison subjects. In other words, the total cost was about 2-fold greater for OAG subjects than comparison subjects. Conclusions: We concluded that subjects with OAG had significantly higher utilization of all healthcare services than comparison subjects.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)e116-e120
期刊Journal of Glaucoma
24
發行號5
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 六月 19 2015

指紋

Open Angle Glaucoma
Delivery of Health Care
Outpatients
Population
Costs and Cost Analysis
Inpatients
National Health Programs
Taiwan
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medicine(all)

引用此文

Incremental Healthcare Service Utilization for Open-angle Glaucoma : A Population-Based Study. / Chung, Shiu Dong; Ho, Jau Der; Lin, Herng Ching; Kao, Li Ting; Tsai, Ming Chieh.

於: Journal of Glaucoma, 卷 24, 編號 5, 19.06.2015, p. e116-e120.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

Chung, Shiu Dong ; Ho, Jau Der ; Lin, Herng Ching ; Kao, Li Ting ; Tsai, Ming Chieh. / Incremental Healthcare Service Utilization for Open-angle Glaucoma : A Population-Based Study. 於: Journal of Glaucoma. 2015 ; 卷 24, 編號 5. 頁 e116-e120.
@article{1050a7f3acb5411ca4c09a07eac18206,
title = "Incremental Healthcare Service Utilization for Open-angle Glaucoma: A Population-Based Study",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate differences in the utilization of healthcare services between subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and comparison subjects without OAG using Taiwan's National Health Insurance population-based database. Patients and Methods: The study comprised 2204 subjects with OAG and 2204 sex-matched and age-matched subjects without OAG. We individually followed each subject for a 1-year period to evaluate their healthcare resource utilization. Outcome variables of the healthcare resource utilization were as follows: numbers of outpatient visits and inpatient days and the mean costs of outpatient and inpatient treatment. In addition, we divided healthcare resource utilization into ophthalmologic and nonophthalmologic services. Results: As for the utilization of ophthalmologic services, OAG subjects had significantly more outpatient visits (7.4 vs. 1.3, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient costs (US$272 vs. US$39, P <0.001) than comparison subjects. For nonophthalmologic services, OAG subjects also had significantly more outpatient visits (29.4 vs. 21.8, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient costs (US$1263 vs. US$847, P <0.001) than comparison subjects. Furthermore, OAG subjects incurred significantly higher inpatient costs compared with comparison subjects (US$434 vs. US$234, P <0.001). For all healthcare services, OAG subjects had significantly more outpatient visits (36.8 vs. 23.1, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient (US$1535 vs. US$887, P <0.001) and total (US$2245 vs. US$1122, P <0.001) costs than comparison subjects. In other words, the total cost was about 2-fold greater for OAG subjects than comparison subjects. Conclusions: We concluded that subjects with OAG had significantly higher utilization of all healthcare services than comparison subjects.",
keywords = "costs, glaucoma, open-angle glaucoma, utilization",
author = "Chung, {Shiu Dong} and Ho, {Jau Der} and Lin, {Herng Ching} and Kao, {Li Ting} and Tsai, {Ming Chieh}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1097/IJG.0000000000000222",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "e116--e120",
journal = "Journal of Glaucoma",
issn = "1057-0829",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incremental Healthcare Service Utilization for Open-angle Glaucoma

T2 - A Population-Based Study

AU - Chung, Shiu Dong

AU - Ho, Jau Der

AU - Lin, Herng Ching

AU - Kao, Li Ting

AU - Tsai, Ming Chieh

PY - 2015/6/19

Y1 - 2015/6/19

N2 - Purpose: To investigate differences in the utilization of healthcare services between subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and comparison subjects without OAG using Taiwan's National Health Insurance population-based database. Patients and Methods: The study comprised 2204 subjects with OAG and 2204 sex-matched and age-matched subjects without OAG. We individually followed each subject for a 1-year period to evaluate their healthcare resource utilization. Outcome variables of the healthcare resource utilization were as follows: numbers of outpatient visits and inpatient days and the mean costs of outpatient and inpatient treatment. In addition, we divided healthcare resource utilization into ophthalmologic and nonophthalmologic services. Results: As for the utilization of ophthalmologic services, OAG subjects had significantly more outpatient visits (7.4 vs. 1.3, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient costs (US$272 vs. US$39, P <0.001) than comparison subjects. For nonophthalmologic services, OAG subjects also had significantly more outpatient visits (29.4 vs. 21.8, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient costs (US$1263 vs. US$847, P <0.001) than comparison subjects. Furthermore, OAG subjects incurred significantly higher inpatient costs compared with comparison subjects (US$434 vs. US$234, P <0.001). For all healthcare services, OAG subjects had significantly more outpatient visits (36.8 vs. 23.1, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient (US$1535 vs. US$887, P <0.001) and total (US$2245 vs. US$1122, P <0.001) costs than comparison subjects. In other words, the total cost was about 2-fold greater for OAG subjects than comparison subjects. Conclusions: We concluded that subjects with OAG had significantly higher utilization of all healthcare services than comparison subjects.

AB - Purpose: To investigate differences in the utilization of healthcare services between subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and comparison subjects without OAG using Taiwan's National Health Insurance population-based database. Patients and Methods: The study comprised 2204 subjects with OAG and 2204 sex-matched and age-matched subjects without OAG. We individually followed each subject for a 1-year period to evaluate their healthcare resource utilization. Outcome variables of the healthcare resource utilization were as follows: numbers of outpatient visits and inpatient days and the mean costs of outpatient and inpatient treatment. In addition, we divided healthcare resource utilization into ophthalmologic and nonophthalmologic services. Results: As for the utilization of ophthalmologic services, OAG subjects had significantly more outpatient visits (7.4 vs. 1.3, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient costs (US$272 vs. US$39, P <0.001) than comparison subjects. For nonophthalmologic services, OAG subjects also had significantly more outpatient visits (29.4 vs. 21.8, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient costs (US$1263 vs. US$847, P <0.001) than comparison subjects. Furthermore, OAG subjects incurred significantly higher inpatient costs compared with comparison subjects (US$434 vs. US$234, P <0.001). For all healthcare services, OAG subjects had significantly more outpatient visits (36.8 vs. 23.1, P <0.001) and significantly higher outpatient (US$1535 vs. US$887, P <0.001) and total (US$2245 vs. US$1122, P <0.001) costs than comparison subjects. In other words, the total cost was about 2-fold greater for OAG subjects than comparison subjects. Conclusions: We concluded that subjects with OAG had significantly higher utilization of all healthcare services than comparison subjects.

KW - costs

KW - glaucoma

KW - open-angle glaucoma

KW - utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931568248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931568248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000222

DO - 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000222

M3 - Article

C2 - 25642815

AN - SCOPUS:84931568248

VL - 24

SP - e116-e120

JO - Journal of Glaucoma

JF - Journal of Glaucoma

SN - 1057-0829

IS - 5

ER -