Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol

Malissa Kay Shaw, Mojca Babovi, Lynn Valerie Monrouxe

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻回顧型文獻

摘要

Introduction Stem cell research (SCR) and the biomedical potential of developing therapies are crucial topics in biomedicine. Like other biotechnologies, stem cells are context specific entities understood through local conceptualisations of culture, politics, nationhood, as well as their perceived therapeutic efficacy. There is a need to recognise how these developments are understood within the healthcare community and by those who may use them. This protocol describes a systematic literature review that aims to explore healthcare professionals', healthcare students', patients', and donors' perceptions of SCR and therapy (SCR/T) and the factors that influence their perceptions. Methods and analysis Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines a systematic review will be undertaken. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline+Journals @Ovid and Ariti Library will be systematically searched for studies on healthcare professionals', healthcare students', patients' and donors' perceptions of SCR and developing therapies. All articles will be screened by a researcher for inclusion and evaluation based on 12 criteria for evaluating qualitative research. At least 20% of articles will also be reviewed by a second researcher and any disagreement will be solved via consensus. Data extracted from the articles will be analysed using thematic synthesis enabling the identification of concepts across studies and the development of new theory. Ethics and dissemination As part of a larger research project, ethical approval has been provided by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. This review will be able to determine the impact that certain perceptions of SCR/T will have on the development of future medical knowledge and practice. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018103627.Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.
原文英語
文章編號 e025801
期刊BMJ Open
9
發行號2
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 二月 1 2019

指紋

Stem Cell Research
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
Tissue Donors
Students
Delivery of Health Care
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research
Politics
Biotechnology
Research
Ethics
Libraries
Meta-Analysis
Stem Cells
Therapeutics
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

引用此文

Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol. / Shaw, Malissa Kay; Babovi, Mojca; Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie.

於: BMJ Open, 卷 9, 編號 2, e025801, 01.02.2019.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻回顧型文獻

@article{0137a021956d4befa7e6bf93f210cbeb,
title = "Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol",
abstract = "Introduction Stem cell research (SCR) and the biomedical potential of developing therapies are crucial topics in biomedicine. Like other biotechnologies, stem cells are context specific entities understood through local conceptualisations of culture, politics, nationhood, as well as their perceived therapeutic efficacy. There is a need to recognise how these developments are understood within the healthcare community and by those who may use them. This protocol describes a systematic literature review that aims to explore healthcare professionals', healthcare students', patients', and donors' perceptions of SCR and therapy (SCR/T) and the factors that influence their perceptions. Methods and analysis Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines a systematic review will be undertaken. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline+Journals @Ovid and Ariti Library will be systematically searched for studies on healthcare professionals', healthcare students', patients' and donors' perceptions of SCR and developing therapies. All articles will be screened by a researcher for inclusion and evaluation based on 12 criteria for evaluating qualitative research. At least 20{\%} of articles will also be reviewed by a second researcher and any disagreement will be solved via consensus. Data extracted from the articles will be analysed using thematic synthesis enabling the identification of concepts across studies and the development of new theory. Ethics and dissemination As part of a larger research project, ethical approval has been provided by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. This review will be able to determine the impact that certain perceptions of SCR/T will have on the development of future medical knowledge and practice. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018103627.Copyright {\circledC} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.",
keywords = "perceptions, stem cell research, stem cell therapy, systematic review, thematic synthesis",
author = "Shaw, {Malissa Kay} and Mojca Babovi and Monrouxe, {Lynn Valerie}",
note = "{\circledC} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025801",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol

AU - Shaw, Malissa Kay

AU - Babovi, Mojca

AU - Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Introduction Stem cell research (SCR) and the biomedical potential of developing therapies are crucial topics in biomedicine. Like other biotechnologies, stem cells are context specific entities understood through local conceptualisations of culture, politics, nationhood, as well as their perceived therapeutic efficacy. There is a need to recognise how these developments are understood within the healthcare community and by those who may use them. This protocol describes a systematic literature review that aims to explore healthcare professionals', healthcare students', patients', and donors' perceptions of SCR and therapy (SCR/T) and the factors that influence their perceptions. Methods and analysis Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines a systematic review will be undertaken. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline+Journals @Ovid and Ariti Library will be systematically searched for studies on healthcare professionals', healthcare students', patients' and donors' perceptions of SCR and developing therapies. All articles will be screened by a researcher for inclusion and evaluation based on 12 criteria for evaluating qualitative research. At least 20% of articles will also be reviewed by a second researcher and any disagreement will be solved via consensus. Data extracted from the articles will be analysed using thematic synthesis enabling the identification of concepts across studies and the development of new theory. Ethics and dissemination As part of a larger research project, ethical approval has been provided by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. This review will be able to determine the impact that certain perceptions of SCR/T will have on the development of future medical knowledge and practice. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018103627.Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.

AB - Introduction Stem cell research (SCR) and the biomedical potential of developing therapies are crucial topics in biomedicine. Like other biotechnologies, stem cells are context specific entities understood through local conceptualisations of culture, politics, nationhood, as well as their perceived therapeutic efficacy. There is a need to recognise how these developments are understood within the healthcare community and by those who may use them. This protocol describes a systematic literature review that aims to explore healthcare professionals', healthcare students', patients', and donors' perceptions of SCR and therapy (SCR/T) and the factors that influence their perceptions. Methods and analysis Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines a systematic review will be undertaken. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline+Journals @Ovid and Ariti Library will be systematically searched for studies on healthcare professionals', healthcare students', patients' and donors' perceptions of SCR and developing therapies. All articles will be screened by a researcher for inclusion and evaluation based on 12 criteria for evaluating qualitative research. At least 20% of articles will also be reviewed by a second researcher and any disagreement will be solved via consensus. Data extracted from the articles will be analysed using thematic synthesis enabling the identification of concepts across studies and the development of new theory. Ethics and dissemination As part of a larger research project, ethical approval has been provided by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. This review will be able to determine the impact that certain perceptions of SCR/T will have on the development of future medical knowledge and practice. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018103627.Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.

KW - perceptions

KW - stem cell research

KW - stem cell therapy

KW - systematic review

KW - thematic synthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062079003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062079003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025801

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025801

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30798317

AN - SCOPUS:85062079003

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 2

M1 - e025801

ER -