Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments

Shu Shin Chen, Jih Chang Chen, Chip Jin Ng, Ping Ling Chen, Pi-Hsia Lee, Wen Yin Chang

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

18 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Objectives: To gain an understanding of the accuracy of acuity assessment made by emergency department (ED) triage nurses, to compare the differences between the characteristics of triage nurses according to hospital variables and the accuracy of acuity ratings, and to explore the influence of nursing variables on the judgement of triages. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted at the EDs of hospitals in northern Taiwan. Ten adult emergency case scenarios and a demographic sheet with high validity were developed to survey 279 triage nurses. Data were collected from April to October 2006. All data were analysed using percentage, mean, SD, independent t test, one-way ANOVA and a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results: The average score of rating accuracy was 5.62 points (out of a possible total of 10 points), which was considered low. Approximately 24.3% (n=68) of nurses' triage ratings were under-triaged and 19.7% (n=55) were over-triaged. Factors included years of ED experience, hours of triage education, level of hospital and triage mode of delivery. These factors were identified as significantly affecting the accuracy of nurses' judgement (p2=40.0%). Conclusion: The scores of accuracy ratings for triage nurses can be improved if factors contributing to inaccuracy can be altered. The findings of this study can be used to guide improvements.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)451-455
頁數5
期刊Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
27
發行號6
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 六月 2010

指紋

Triage
Hospital Emergency Service
Nurses
Taiwan
Analysis of Variance
Nursing
Emergencies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Demography
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

引用此文

Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments. / Chen, Shu Shin; Chen, Jih Chang; Ng, Chip Jin; Chen, Ping Ling; Lee, Pi-Hsia; Chang, Wen Yin.

於: Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 卷 27, 編號 6, 06.2010, p. 451-455.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

Chen, Shu Shin ; Chen, Jih Chang ; Ng, Chip Jin ; Chen, Ping Ling ; Lee, Pi-Hsia ; Chang, Wen Yin. / Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments. 於: Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 2010 ; 卷 27, 編號 6. 頁 451-455.
@article{a591454fc0454ed1bd8bf81a376301f4,
title = "Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments",
abstract = "Objectives: To gain an understanding of the accuracy of acuity assessment made by emergency department (ED) triage nurses, to compare the differences between the characteristics of triage nurses according to hospital variables and the accuracy of acuity ratings, and to explore the influence of nursing variables on the judgement of triages. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted at the EDs of hospitals in northern Taiwan. Ten adult emergency case scenarios and a demographic sheet with high validity were developed to survey 279 triage nurses. Data were collected from April to October 2006. All data were analysed using percentage, mean, SD, independent t test, one-way ANOVA and a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results: The average score of rating accuracy was 5.62 points (out of a possible total of 10 points), which was considered low. Approximately 24.3{\%} (n=68) of nurses' triage ratings were under-triaged and 19.7{\%} (n=55) were over-triaged. Factors included years of ED experience, hours of triage education, level of hospital and triage mode of delivery. These factors were identified as significantly affecting the accuracy of nurses' judgement (p2=40.0{\%}). Conclusion: The scores of accuracy ratings for triage nurses can be improved if factors contributing to inaccuracy can be altered. The findings of this study can be used to guide improvements.",
author = "Chen, {Shu Shin} and Chen, {Jih Chang} and Ng, {Chip Jin} and Chen, {Ping Ling} and Pi-Hsia Lee and Chang, {Wen Yin}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1136/emj.2008.059311",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "451--455",
journal = "Emergency Medicine Journal",
issn = "1472-0205",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments

AU - Chen, Shu Shin

AU - Chen, Jih Chang

AU - Ng, Chip Jin

AU - Chen, Ping Ling

AU - Lee, Pi-Hsia

AU - Chang, Wen Yin

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Objectives: To gain an understanding of the accuracy of acuity assessment made by emergency department (ED) triage nurses, to compare the differences between the characteristics of triage nurses according to hospital variables and the accuracy of acuity ratings, and to explore the influence of nursing variables on the judgement of triages. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted at the EDs of hospitals in northern Taiwan. Ten adult emergency case scenarios and a demographic sheet with high validity were developed to survey 279 triage nurses. Data were collected from April to October 2006. All data were analysed using percentage, mean, SD, independent t test, one-way ANOVA and a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results: The average score of rating accuracy was 5.62 points (out of a possible total of 10 points), which was considered low. Approximately 24.3% (n=68) of nurses' triage ratings were under-triaged and 19.7% (n=55) were over-triaged. Factors included years of ED experience, hours of triage education, level of hospital and triage mode of delivery. These factors were identified as significantly affecting the accuracy of nurses' judgement (p2=40.0%). Conclusion: The scores of accuracy ratings for triage nurses can be improved if factors contributing to inaccuracy can be altered. The findings of this study can be used to guide improvements.

AB - Objectives: To gain an understanding of the accuracy of acuity assessment made by emergency department (ED) triage nurses, to compare the differences between the characteristics of triage nurses according to hospital variables and the accuracy of acuity ratings, and to explore the influence of nursing variables on the judgement of triages. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted at the EDs of hospitals in northern Taiwan. Ten adult emergency case scenarios and a demographic sheet with high validity were developed to survey 279 triage nurses. Data were collected from April to October 2006. All data were analysed using percentage, mean, SD, independent t test, one-way ANOVA and a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results: The average score of rating accuracy was 5.62 points (out of a possible total of 10 points), which was considered low. Approximately 24.3% (n=68) of nurses' triage ratings were under-triaged and 19.7% (n=55) were over-triaged. Factors included years of ED experience, hours of triage education, level of hospital and triage mode of delivery. These factors were identified as significantly affecting the accuracy of nurses' judgement (p2=40.0%). Conclusion: The scores of accuracy ratings for triage nurses can be improved if factors contributing to inaccuracy can be altered. The findings of this study can be used to guide improvements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953773228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953773228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/emj.2008.059311

DO - 10.1136/emj.2008.059311

M3 - Article

C2 - 20562141

AN - SCOPUS:77953773228

VL - 27

SP - 451

EP - 455

JO - Emergency Medicine Journal

JF - Emergency Medicine Journal

SN - 1472-0205

IS - 6

ER -