Electroacupuncture analgesia, stress responses, and variations in sensitivity in rats anesthetized with different sub-MAC anesthetics

Hsiang Hsun Kung, Sheng Feng Hsu, Yu Chun Hung, Kuen Bao Chen, Jui Yuan Chen, Yeong Ray Wen, Wei Zen Sun

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

8 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

The use of anesthetics to stabilize animals for the purpose of electroacupuncture (EA) analgesic studies can be problematic because of the interference of differential physiological responses to EA and pain. In this study, EA-induced physiological profiles were surveyed under a sub-minimal alveolar concentration (sub-MAC) of two different anesthetics in a previously proposed minimal stress model. First, to select an adequate concentration, compliance with EA and tail-flick stimulation was evaluated under various concentrations of halothane and isoflurane. Second, using the chosen concentrations, low- (4-Hz) and high-frequency (100-Hz) EA were conducted on the right hind limb. The EA effects of the two gases were compared by tail-flick latency (TFL), hemodynamic variables, and individual variations in analgesic sensitivity. The optimal concentrations for halothane and isoflurane were 0.5% and 0.75%, respectively. TFLs were stable under these anesthetic levels, but rats under 0.75% isoflurane had better compliance than those under 0.5% halothane. EA inhibited TFLs with distinct analgesic patterns when comparing high- and low-frequency EA, but TFL suppression did not differ between the two gases. Heart rate and blood pressure showed temporal and differential responses to low- vs. high-frequency EA, but were comparable between groups under the two anesthetics. The ratios of EA non-responders in the isoflurane and halothane groups were 32.4% and 26.7%, respectively, without statistical difference. We concluded that sub-MAC halothane and isoflurane provide optimal conditions for the study of EA-induced analgesia in rats. In this model, 0.75% isoflurane appears to be a better choice than 0.5% halothane in terms of EA compliance.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)600-607
頁數8
期刊European Journal of Pain
15
發行號6
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 七月 2011

指紋

Electroacupuncture
Analgesia
Anesthetics
Isoflurane
Halothane
Analgesics
Tail
Gases
Compliance
Extremities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

引用此文

Electroacupuncture analgesia, stress responses, and variations in sensitivity in rats anesthetized with different sub-MAC anesthetics. / Kung, Hsiang Hsun; Hsu, Sheng Feng; Hung, Yu Chun; Chen, Kuen Bao; Chen, Jui Yuan; Wen, Yeong Ray; Sun, Wei Zen.

於: European Journal of Pain, 卷 15, 編號 6, 07.2011, p. 600-607.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

Kung, Hsiang Hsun ; Hsu, Sheng Feng ; Hung, Yu Chun ; Chen, Kuen Bao ; Chen, Jui Yuan ; Wen, Yeong Ray ; Sun, Wei Zen. / Electroacupuncture analgesia, stress responses, and variations in sensitivity in rats anesthetized with different sub-MAC anesthetics. 於: European Journal of Pain. 2011 ; 卷 15, 編號 6. 頁 600-607.
@article{e6064b929a7e41c4bdc7d120e6cae7bb,
title = "Electroacupuncture analgesia, stress responses, and variations in sensitivity in rats anesthetized with different sub-MAC anesthetics",
abstract = "The use of anesthetics to stabilize animals for the purpose of electroacupuncture (EA) analgesic studies can be problematic because of the interference of differential physiological responses to EA and pain. In this study, EA-induced physiological profiles were surveyed under a sub-minimal alveolar concentration (sub-MAC) of two different anesthetics in a previously proposed minimal stress model. First, to select an adequate concentration, compliance with EA and tail-flick stimulation was evaluated under various concentrations of halothane and isoflurane. Second, using the chosen concentrations, low- (4-Hz) and high-frequency (100-Hz) EA were conducted on the right hind limb. The EA effects of the two gases were compared by tail-flick latency (TFL), hemodynamic variables, and individual variations in analgesic sensitivity. The optimal concentrations for halothane and isoflurane were 0.5{\%} and 0.75{\%}, respectively. TFLs were stable under these anesthetic levels, but rats under 0.75{\%} isoflurane had better compliance than those under 0.5{\%} halothane. EA inhibited TFLs with distinct analgesic patterns when comparing high- and low-frequency EA, but TFL suppression did not differ between the two gases. Heart rate and blood pressure showed temporal and differential responses to low- vs. high-frequency EA, but were comparable between groups under the two anesthetics. The ratios of EA non-responders in the isoflurane and halothane groups were 32.4{\%} and 26.7{\%}, respectively, without statistical difference. We concluded that sub-MAC halothane and isoflurane provide optimal conditions for the study of EA-induced analgesia in rats. In this model, 0.75{\%} isoflurane appears to be a better choice than 0.5{\%} halothane in terms of EA compliance.",
keywords = "EA sensitivity, Electroacupuncture, Inhalation anesthetics, Stress-induced analgesia, Tail-flick latency, Zusanli",
author = "Kung, {Hsiang Hsun} and Hsu, {Sheng Feng} and Hung, {Yu Chun} and Chen, {Kuen Bao} and Chen, {Jui Yuan} and Wen, {Yeong Ray} and Sun, {Wei Zen}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "600--607",
journal = "European Journal of Pain",
issn = "1090-3801",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electroacupuncture analgesia, stress responses, and variations in sensitivity in rats anesthetized with different sub-MAC anesthetics

AU - Kung, Hsiang Hsun

AU - Hsu, Sheng Feng

AU - Hung, Yu Chun

AU - Chen, Kuen Bao

AU - Chen, Jui Yuan

AU - Wen, Yeong Ray

AU - Sun, Wei Zen

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - The use of anesthetics to stabilize animals for the purpose of electroacupuncture (EA) analgesic studies can be problematic because of the interference of differential physiological responses to EA and pain. In this study, EA-induced physiological profiles were surveyed under a sub-minimal alveolar concentration (sub-MAC) of two different anesthetics in a previously proposed minimal stress model. First, to select an adequate concentration, compliance with EA and tail-flick stimulation was evaluated under various concentrations of halothane and isoflurane. Second, using the chosen concentrations, low- (4-Hz) and high-frequency (100-Hz) EA were conducted on the right hind limb. The EA effects of the two gases were compared by tail-flick latency (TFL), hemodynamic variables, and individual variations in analgesic sensitivity. The optimal concentrations for halothane and isoflurane were 0.5% and 0.75%, respectively. TFLs were stable under these anesthetic levels, but rats under 0.75% isoflurane had better compliance than those under 0.5% halothane. EA inhibited TFLs with distinct analgesic patterns when comparing high- and low-frequency EA, but TFL suppression did not differ between the two gases. Heart rate and blood pressure showed temporal and differential responses to low- vs. high-frequency EA, but were comparable between groups under the two anesthetics. The ratios of EA non-responders in the isoflurane and halothane groups were 32.4% and 26.7%, respectively, without statistical difference. We concluded that sub-MAC halothane and isoflurane provide optimal conditions for the study of EA-induced analgesia in rats. In this model, 0.75% isoflurane appears to be a better choice than 0.5% halothane in terms of EA compliance.

AB - The use of anesthetics to stabilize animals for the purpose of electroacupuncture (EA) analgesic studies can be problematic because of the interference of differential physiological responses to EA and pain. In this study, EA-induced physiological profiles were surveyed under a sub-minimal alveolar concentration (sub-MAC) of two different anesthetics in a previously proposed minimal stress model. First, to select an adequate concentration, compliance with EA and tail-flick stimulation was evaluated under various concentrations of halothane and isoflurane. Second, using the chosen concentrations, low- (4-Hz) and high-frequency (100-Hz) EA were conducted on the right hind limb. The EA effects of the two gases were compared by tail-flick latency (TFL), hemodynamic variables, and individual variations in analgesic sensitivity. The optimal concentrations for halothane and isoflurane were 0.5% and 0.75%, respectively. TFLs were stable under these anesthetic levels, but rats under 0.75% isoflurane had better compliance than those under 0.5% halothane. EA inhibited TFLs with distinct analgesic patterns when comparing high- and low-frequency EA, but TFL suppression did not differ between the two gases. Heart rate and blood pressure showed temporal and differential responses to low- vs. high-frequency EA, but were comparable between groups under the two anesthetics. The ratios of EA non-responders in the isoflurane and halothane groups were 32.4% and 26.7%, respectively, without statistical difference. We concluded that sub-MAC halothane and isoflurane provide optimal conditions for the study of EA-induced analgesia in rats. In this model, 0.75% isoflurane appears to be a better choice than 0.5% halothane in terms of EA compliance.

KW - EA sensitivity

KW - Electroacupuncture

KW - Inhalation anesthetics

KW - Stress-induced analgesia

KW - Tail-flick latency

KW - Zusanli

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959378653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959378653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.11.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 21134769

AN - SCOPUS:79959378653

VL - 15

SP - 600

EP - 607

JO - European Journal of Pain

JF - European Journal of Pain

SN - 1090-3801

IS - 6

ER -