Dual triggering with GnRH agonist plus hCG versus triggering with hCG alone for IVF/ICSI outcome in GnRH antagonist cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chi Huang Chen, Chii Ruey Tzeng, Peng Hui Wang, Wei Min Liu, Heng Yu Chang, Huang Hui Chen, Ching Hui Chen

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

5 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Purpose: To summarize available evidence from randomized-controlled trials which have evaluated triggering of final oocyte maturation with concomitant GnRH agonists and hCG in patients undergoing IVF, and to analyze whether dual triggering is as efficacious as hCG triggering in terms of oocyte and pregnancy outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify randomized-controlled trials comparing IVF outcomes between women receiving combined administration of hCG with GnRH agonists and those receiving hCG alone for triggering of final oocyte maturation. Results: Four studies including 527 patients eligible for inclusion in meta-analysis were identified. No significant difference in the number of mature oocytes or fertilized oocytes retrieved was found between groups. Clinical pregnancy rate with dual triggering was significantly higher as compared with hCG-alone triggering (pooled OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.31–0.77, P = 0.002), but there was no significant difference in the ongoing pregnancy rate between groups. Conclusion: Results of meta-analysis indicate comparable or significantly improved outcomes with the use of GnRH agonists plus hCG as compared with hCG alone for triggering of final oocyte maturation.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)1-10
頁數10
期刊Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
DOIs
出版狀態接受/付印 - 三月 29 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

指紋 深入研究「Dual triggering with GnRH agonist plus hCG versus triggering with hCG alone for IVF/ICSI outcome in GnRH antagonist cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

  • 引用此