Differential impacts of modes of anaesthesia on the risk of stroke among preeclamptic women who undergo Caesarean delivery: A population-based study

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章同行評審

35 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Background. This study compared the stroke-free survival rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke between preeclamptic women who received general anaesthesia and those who received neuraxial anaesthesia for Caesarean section (CS). Methods. This study used 2002-7 data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The stroke-free survival rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to examine the difference in the stroke-free survival rates between general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia. The Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the HR for general anaesthesia. Results. A total of 303 862 women underwent CS of which 8567 had preeclampsia (75 stroke cases) and 295 295 did not (303 stroke cases). The stroke-free survival rate was significantly lower in the preeclamptic women who received general anaesthesia when compared with those who received epidural (P=0.008) or spinal anaesthesia (P
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)818-826
頁數9
期刊British Journal of Anaesthesia
105
發行號6
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 十二月 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 麻醉與疼痛醫學

指紋

深入研究「Differential impacts of modes of anaesthesia on the risk of stroke among preeclamptic women who undergo Caesarean delivery: A population-based study」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此