Correction of Facial Asymmetry with Multiplanar Mandible Distraction: A One-Year Follow-Up Study

Ellen W. Ko, Kai Fong Hung, Chiung Shing Huang, Philip K T Chen

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

29 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of multiplanar mandibular distraction by evaluating the treatment effect and 1-year stability, measuring changes on the affected and nonaffected sides, and evaluating correction of the occlusal plane and oral commissure cant. Patients and Method: Eleven patients aged 5 to 9.4 years (mean 6.7 years) who underwent unilateral multiplanar mandibular distraction were included, 10 with hemifacial microsomia and one temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Intermaxillary elastics were applied to intraoral dental devices during and after distraction until bony consolidation and occlusal interdigitation were achieved. Radiographs were taken and measured before distraction, after vertical distraction, after completion of distraction, and 1 year after treatment. Frontal facial photographs were obtained to analyze the changes in the position of the oral commissure. Results: The facial profile was improved by sagittal mandibular advancement. Although the facial height increased 6.6 mm during vertical distraction, with a net gain of 5.8 mm in follow-up, the mandibular plane angle was maintained. The affected mandibular length increased 8.3 mm after distraction and remained unchanged after 1 year. Ramus height increased 12.7 mm after distraction and relapsed 3.8 mm at follow-up (30%). The affected body length demonstrated postoperative growth of 3.1 mm. Correction of the chin deviation was 9.8 mm after distraction and relapsed 1.6 mm (16.3%) after 1 year. Canting of the occlusal plane and oral commissure was corrected and remained stable. Conclusion: Multiplanar mandibular distraction is an effective treatment for correcting facial asymmetry in young children. The 1-year follow-up revealed that the new sagittal jaw relation and mandibular body length were stable, and the achieved occlusal interdigitation was well maintained. However, the ramus height and chin deviation demonstrated some relapse.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)5-12
頁數8
期刊Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
41
發行號1
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 一月 1 2004
對外發佈Yes

指紋

Facial Asymmetry
Mandible
Dental Occlusion
Chin
Mandibular Advancement
Goldenhar Syndrome
Jaw
Tooth
Therapeutics
Recurrence
Equipment and Supplies
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

引用此文

Correction of Facial Asymmetry with Multiplanar Mandible Distraction : A One-Year Follow-Up Study. / Ko, Ellen W.; Hung, Kai Fong; Huang, Chiung Shing; Chen, Philip K T.

於: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 卷 41, 編號 1, 01.01.2004, p. 5-12.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

@article{945162a670f8462ea562a10d0efedc4f,
title = "Correction of Facial Asymmetry with Multiplanar Mandible Distraction: A One-Year Follow-Up Study",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the effectiveness of multiplanar mandibular distraction by evaluating the treatment effect and 1-year stability, measuring changes on the affected and nonaffected sides, and evaluating correction of the occlusal plane and oral commissure cant. Patients and Method: Eleven patients aged 5 to 9.4 years (mean 6.7 years) who underwent unilateral multiplanar mandibular distraction were included, 10 with hemifacial microsomia and one temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Intermaxillary elastics were applied to intraoral dental devices during and after distraction until bony consolidation and occlusal interdigitation were achieved. Radiographs were taken and measured before distraction, after vertical distraction, after completion of distraction, and 1 year after treatment. Frontal facial photographs were obtained to analyze the changes in the position of the oral commissure. Results: The facial profile was improved by sagittal mandibular advancement. Although the facial height increased 6.6 mm during vertical distraction, with a net gain of 5.8 mm in follow-up, the mandibular plane angle was maintained. The affected mandibular length increased 8.3 mm after distraction and remained unchanged after 1 year. Ramus height increased 12.7 mm after distraction and relapsed 3.8 mm at follow-up (30{\%}). The affected body length demonstrated postoperative growth of 3.1 mm. Correction of the chin deviation was 9.8 mm after distraction and relapsed 1.6 mm (16.3{\%}) after 1 year. Canting of the occlusal plane and oral commissure was corrected and remained stable. Conclusion: Multiplanar mandibular distraction is an effective treatment for correcting facial asymmetry in young children. The 1-year follow-up revealed that the new sagittal jaw relation and mandibular body length were stable, and the achieved occlusal interdigitation was well maintained. However, the ramus height and chin deviation demonstrated some relapse.",
keywords = "Distraction osteogenesis, Facial asymmetry, Hemifacial microsomia, Intermaxillary elastics, Mandible, Multiplanar mandible distractor",
author = "Ko, {Ellen W.} and Hung, {Kai Fong} and Huang, {Chiung Shing} and Chen, {Philip K T}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1597/02-132",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "5--12",
journal = "Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal",
issn = "1055-6656",
publisher = "American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction of Facial Asymmetry with Multiplanar Mandible Distraction

T2 - A One-Year Follow-Up Study

AU - Ko, Ellen W.

AU - Hung, Kai Fong

AU - Huang, Chiung Shing

AU - Chen, Philip K T

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the effectiveness of multiplanar mandibular distraction by evaluating the treatment effect and 1-year stability, measuring changes on the affected and nonaffected sides, and evaluating correction of the occlusal plane and oral commissure cant. Patients and Method: Eleven patients aged 5 to 9.4 years (mean 6.7 years) who underwent unilateral multiplanar mandibular distraction were included, 10 with hemifacial microsomia and one temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Intermaxillary elastics were applied to intraoral dental devices during and after distraction until bony consolidation and occlusal interdigitation were achieved. Radiographs were taken and measured before distraction, after vertical distraction, after completion of distraction, and 1 year after treatment. Frontal facial photographs were obtained to analyze the changes in the position of the oral commissure. Results: The facial profile was improved by sagittal mandibular advancement. Although the facial height increased 6.6 mm during vertical distraction, with a net gain of 5.8 mm in follow-up, the mandibular plane angle was maintained. The affected mandibular length increased 8.3 mm after distraction and remained unchanged after 1 year. Ramus height increased 12.7 mm after distraction and relapsed 3.8 mm at follow-up (30%). The affected body length demonstrated postoperative growth of 3.1 mm. Correction of the chin deviation was 9.8 mm after distraction and relapsed 1.6 mm (16.3%) after 1 year. Canting of the occlusal plane and oral commissure was corrected and remained stable. Conclusion: Multiplanar mandibular distraction is an effective treatment for correcting facial asymmetry in young children. The 1-year follow-up revealed that the new sagittal jaw relation and mandibular body length were stable, and the achieved occlusal interdigitation was well maintained. However, the ramus height and chin deviation demonstrated some relapse.

AB - Objective: To assess the effectiveness of multiplanar mandibular distraction by evaluating the treatment effect and 1-year stability, measuring changes on the affected and nonaffected sides, and evaluating correction of the occlusal plane and oral commissure cant. Patients and Method: Eleven patients aged 5 to 9.4 years (mean 6.7 years) who underwent unilateral multiplanar mandibular distraction were included, 10 with hemifacial microsomia and one temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Intermaxillary elastics were applied to intraoral dental devices during and after distraction until bony consolidation and occlusal interdigitation were achieved. Radiographs were taken and measured before distraction, after vertical distraction, after completion of distraction, and 1 year after treatment. Frontal facial photographs were obtained to analyze the changes in the position of the oral commissure. Results: The facial profile was improved by sagittal mandibular advancement. Although the facial height increased 6.6 mm during vertical distraction, with a net gain of 5.8 mm in follow-up, the mandibular plane angle was maintained. The affected mandibular length increased 8.3 mm after distraction and remained unchanged after 1 year. Ramus height increased 12.7 mm after distraction and relapsed 3.8 mm at follow-up (30%). The affected body length demonstrated postoperative growth of 3.1 mm. Correction of the chin deviation was 9.8 mm after distraction and relapsed 1.6 mm (16.3%) after 1 year. Canting of the occlusal plane and oral commissure was corrected and remained stable. Conclusion: Multiplanar mandibular distraction is an effective treatment for correcting facial asymmetry in young children. The 1-year follow-up revealed that the new sagittal jaw relation and mandibular body length were stable, and the achieved occlusal interdigitation was well maintained. However, the ramus height and chin deviation demonstrated some relapse.

KW - Distraction osteogenesis

KW - Facial asymmetry

KW - Hemifacial microsomia

KW - Intermaxillary elastics

KW - Mandible

KW - Multiplanar mandible distractor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347724019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347724019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1597/02-132

DO - 10.1597/02-132

M3 - Article

C2 - 14697076

AN - SCOPUS:0347724019

VL - 41

SP - 5

EP - 12

JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

SN - 1055-6656

IS - 1

ER -