Comparisons of self-ratings on managerial competencies, research capability, time management, executive power, workload and work stress among nurse administrators

Chun Mei Kang, Hsiao Ting Chiu, Yi Chun Hu, Hsiao Lien Chen, Pi Hsia Lee, Wen Yin Chang

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

14 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Aims To assess the level of and the differences in managerial competencies, research capability, time management, executive power, workload and work-stress ratings among nurse administrators (NAs), and to determine the best predictors of managerial competencies for NAs. Background Although NAs require multifaceted managerial competencies, research related to NAs' managerial competencies is limited. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 330 NAs from 16 acute care hospitals. Managerial competencies were determined through a self-developed questionnaire. Data were collected in 2011. Results All NAs gave themselves the highest rating on integrity and the lowest on both financial/budgeting and business acumen. All scores for managerial competencies, research capability, time management and executive power showed a statistically significant correlation. The stepwise regression analysis revealed that age; having received NA training; having completed a nursing project independently; and scores for research capability, executive power and workload could explain 63.2% of the total variance in managerial competencies. Conclusion The present study provides recommendations for future administrative training programmes to increase NAs' managerial competency in fulfilling their management roles and functions. Implications for Nursing Management The findings inform leaders of hospitals where NAs need to develop additional competencies concerning the type of training NAs need to function proficiently.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)938-947
頁數10
期刊Journal of Nursing Management
20
發行號7
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 十月 2012

指紋

Time Management
Nurse Administrators
Workload
Research
Nursing
Power (Psychology)
Hospital Administrators
Cross-Sectional Studies
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management

引用此文

Comparisons of self-ratings on managerial competencies, research capability, time management, executive power, workload and work stress among nurse administrators. / Kang, Chun Mei; Chiu, Hsiao Ting; Hu, Yi Chun; Chen, Hsiao Lien; Lee, Pi Hsia; Chang, Wen Yin.

於: Journal of Nursing Management, 卷 20, 編號 7, 10.2012, p. 938-947.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

@article{b95352719c9d4ebe968b3a5be2dbe817,
title = "Comparisons of self-ratings on managerial competencies, research capability, time management, executive power, workload and work stress among nurse administrators",
abstract = "Aims To assess the level of and the differences in managerial competencies, research capability, time management, executive power, workload and work-stress ratings among nurse administrators (NAs), and to determine the best predictors of managerial competencies for NAs. Background Although NAs require multifaceted managerial competencies, research related to NAs' managerial competencies is limited. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 330 NAs from 16 acute care hospitals. Managerial competencies were determined through a self-developed questionnaire. Data were collected in 2011. Results All NAs gave themselves the highest rating on integrity and the lowest on both financial/budgeting and business acumen. All scores for managerial competencies, research capability, time management and executive power showed a statistically significant correlation. The stepwise regression analysis revealed that age; having received NA training; having completed a nursing project independently; and scores for research capability, executive power and workload could explain 63.2{\%} of the total variance in managerial competencies. Conclusion The present study provides recommendations for future administrative training programmes to increase NAs' managerial competency in fulfilling their management roles and functions. Implications for Nursing Management The findings inform leaders of hospitals where NAs need to develop additional competencies concerning the type of training NAs need to function proficiently.",
keywords = "Managerial competency, Nurse administrator, Survey, Work stress, Workload",
author = "Kang, {Chun Mei} and Chiu, {Hsiao Ting} and Hu, {Yi Chun} and Chen, {Hsiao Lien} and Lee, {Pi Hsia} and Chang, {Wen Yin}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01383.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "938--947",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Management",
issn = "0966-0429",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of self-ratings on managerial competencies, research capability, time management, executive power, workload and work stress among nurse administrators

AU - Kang, Chun Mei

AU - Chiu, Hsiao Ting

AU - Hu, Yi Chun

AU - Chen, Hsiao Lien

AU - Lee, Pi Hsia

AU - Chang, Wen Yin

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Aims To assess the level of and the differences in managerial competencies, research capability, time management, executive power, workload and work-stress ratings among nurse administrators (NAs), and to determine the best predictors of managerial competencies for NAs. Background Although NAs require multifaceted managerial competencies, research related to NAs' managerial competencies is limited. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 330 NAs from 16 acute care hospitals. Managerial competencies were determined through a self-developed questionnaire. Data were collected in 2011. Results All NAs gave themselves the highest rating on integrity and the lowest on both financial/budgeting and business acumen. All scores for managerial competencies, research capability, time management and executive power showed a statistically significant correlation. The stepwise regression analysis revealed that age; having received NA training; having completed a nursing project independently; and scores for research capability, executive power and workload could explain 63.2% of the total variance in managerial competencies. Conclusion The present study provides recommendations for future administrative training programmes to increase NAs' managerial competency in fulfilling their management roles and functions. Implications for Nursing Management The findings inform leaders of hospitals where NAs need to develop additional competencies concerning the type of training NAs need to function proficiently.

AB - Aims To assess the level of and the differences in managerial competencies, research capability, time management, executive power, workload and work-stress ratings among nurse administrators (NAs), and to determine the best predictors of managerial competencies for NAs. Background Although NAs require multifaceted managerial competencies, research related to NAs' managerial competencies is limited. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 330 NAs from 16 acute care hospitals. Managerial competencies were determined through a self-developed questionnaire. Data were collected in 2011. Results All NAs gave themselves the highest rating on integrity and the lowest on both financial/budgeting and business acumen. All scores for managerial competencies, research capability, time management and executive power showed a statistically significant correlation. The stepwise regression analysis revealed that age; having received NA training; having completed a nursing project independently; and scores for research capability, executive power and workload could explain 63.2% of the total variance in managerial competencies. Conclusion The present study provides recommendations for future administrative training programmes to increase NAs' managerial competency in fulfilling their management roles and functions. Implications for Nursing Management The findings inform leaders of hospitals where NAs need to develop additional competencies concerning the type of training NAs need to function proficiently.

KW - Managerial competency

KW - Nurse administrator

KW - Survey

KW - Work stress

KW - Workload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867634335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867634335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01383.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01383.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23050627

AN - SCOPUS:84867634335

VL - 20

SP - 938

EP - 947

JO - Journal of Nursing Management

JF - Journal of Nursing Management

SN - 0966-0429

IS - 7

ER -