摘要
原文 | 英語 |
---|---|
頁(從 - 到) | 23-32 |
頁數 | 10 |
期刊 | Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi |
卷 | 113 |
發行號 | 1 |
DOIs | |
出版狀態 | 已發佈 - 一月 2014 |
指紋
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
引用此文
Comparison of domiciliary oxygen using liquid oxygen and concentrator in northern Taiwan. / Su, Chien-Ling; Lee, Chun-Nin; Chen, Hui Chin; Feng, Ling Pei; Lin, Hui Wen; Chiang, Ling Ling.
於: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi, 卷 113, 編號 1, 01.2014, p. 23-32.研究成果: 雜誌貢獻 › 文章
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of domiciliary oxygen using liquid oxygen and concentrator in northern Taiwan
AU - Su, Chien-Ling
AU - Lee, Chun-Nin
AU - Chen, Hui Chin
AU - Feng, Ling Pei
AU - Lin, Hui Wen
AU - Chiang, Ling Ling
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Background/Purpose: Long-term oxygen therapy has become standard treatment for patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency. However, patterns of long-term home oxygen therapy have not been well studied in Taiwan. Oxygen concentrator systems are commonly used in Taiwan, but liquid oxygen delivery systems are portable and may provide advantages over the concentrator system. This study compared oxygen usage between patients from a liquid oxygen group (LOG) and an oxygen concentrator group (OCG). The authors also assessed the physiologic responses of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to ambulatory oxygen use at home. Methods: The study used a retrospective, cross-sectional, observational survey design. The LOG comprised 42 patients, and the OCG comprised 102 patients. We recruited participants in northern Taiwan from July 2009 to April 2010. The questionnaire instruments that were used to collect data consisted of three parts: demographic characteristics, devices used in respiratory care, and activity status with portable oxygen. Two-minute walking tests were performed on COPD patients in their homes. Results: COPD was the most common diagnosis in our study, with more than 50% of patients who received oxygen long term in both groups having received this diagnosis. The LOG used oxygen for an average of 21.7 hours per day, whereas OCG averaged 15.2 hours per day (p
AB - Background/Purpose: Long-term oxygen therapy has become standard treatment for patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency. However, patterns of long-term home oxygen therapy have not been well studied in Taiwan. Oxygen concentrator systems are commonly used in Taiwan, but liquid oxygen delivery systems are portable and may provide advantages over the concentrator system. This study compared oxygen usage between patients from a liquid oxygen group (LOG) and an oxygen concentrator group (OCG). The authors also assessed the physiologic responses of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to ambulatory oxygen use at home. Methods: The study used a retrospective, cross-sectional, observational survey design. The LOG comprised 42 patients, and the OCG comprised 102 patients. We recruited participants in northern Taiwan from July 2009 to April 2010. The questionnaire instruments that were used to collect data consisted of three parts: demographic characteristics, devices used in respiratory care, and activity status with portable oxygen. Two-minute walking tests were performed on COPD patients in their homes. Results: COPD was the most common diagnosis in our study, with more than 50% of patients who received oxygen long term in both groups having received this diagnosis. The LOG used oxygen for an average of 21.7 hours per day, whereas OCG averaged 15.2 hours per day (p
KW - Ambulatory oxygen
KW - Domestic activity
KW - Liquid oxygen
KW - Oxygen concentrator
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892502400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892502400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.03.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.03.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 24445009
AN - SCOPUS:84892502400
VL - 113
SP - 23
EP - 32
JO - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
SN - 0929-6646
IS - 1
ER -