Comparison of documentation time between an electronic and a paper-based record system by optometrists at an eye hospital in south India: A time-motion study

Syed Abdul Shabbir, Luai A. Ahmed, Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir, Jeremiah Scholl, Yu Chuan Li, Der Ming Liou

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

10 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Purpose: The adoption of electronic medical record (EMR) system is gradually increasing. However, various time-motion studies reveal conflicting data regarding time effectiveness on workflow due to computerization. One of the major issues for physicians is their uncertainty with EMRs' potential impact of time on workflow. A tertiary eye hospital in south India was in the process of implementing an EMR system in their ambulatory care unit. Many of the staff did not have previous computing experience and there were conflicting views on the time effectiveness of the computerized system after implementation. The management was thus interested to know the real time effectiveness of EMR in their hospital. The study compliments existing studies of this type by comparing the time efficiency of documentation time using EMR system with paper documentation in a hospital in a developing country where a transition between paper and EMR documentation was currently in progress. Methods: Ten randomly selected optometrists documented the time they spent during consultation with both paper and EMR documentation. The time spent was documented for a total of 200 records (100 EMR and 100 paper records). The independent-samples t-test and analysis of variance were used to compare the means of the consultation time and calculated documentation time spent between the electronic and paper records. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the time spent for documentation between electronic and paper records. The mean time spent in documenting electronic records was 0.92 min (95% CI -3.06 to 1.14) longer than in paper records. Conclusion: EMR systems can be adopted in eye hospitals without having significant negative impact on duration of consultation and documentation for optometrists. More time-motion studies that include ophthalmologists are however needed in order to get a more complete picture of time impact of the EMR system on clinical workflow in eye hospitals.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)283-288
頁數6
期刊Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
100
發行號3
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 十二月 2010

指紋

Electronic medical equipment
Time and Motion Studies
Documentation
India
Electronic Health Records
Workflow
Referral and Consultation
Optometrists
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Developing countries
Ambulatory Care
Tertiary Care Centers
Developing Countries
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Software
  • Health Informatics

引用此文

@article{83c805a131ad4128ae0359bb539da844,
title = "Comparison of documentation time between an electronic and a paper-based record system by optometrists at an eye hospital in south India: A time-motion study",
abstract = "Purpose: The adoption of electronic medical record (EMR) system is gradually increasing. However, various time-motion studies reveal conflicting data regarding time effectiveness on workflow due to computerization. One of the major issues for physicians is their uncertainty with EMRs' potential impact of time on workflow. A tertiary eye hospital in south India was in the process of implementing an EMR system in their ambulatory care unit. Many of the staff did not have previous computing experience and there were conflicting views on the time effectiveness of the computerized system after implementation. The management was thus interested to know the real time effectiveness of EMR in their hospital. The study compliments existing studies of this type by comparing the time efficiency of documentation time using EMR system with paper documentation in a hospital in a developing country where a transition between paper and EMR documentation was currently in progress. Methods: Ten randomly selected optometrists documented the time they spent during consultation with both paper and EMR documentation. The time spent was documented for a total of 200 records (100 EMR and 100 paper records). The independent-samples t-test and analysis of variance were used to compare the means of the consultation time and calculated documentation time spent between the electronic and paper records. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the time spent for documentation between electronic and paper records. The mean time spent in documenting electronic records was 0.92 min (95{\%} CI -3.06 to 1.14) longer than in paper records. Conclusion: EMR systems can be adopted in eye hospitals without having significant negative impact on duration of consultation and documentation for optometrists. More time-motion studies that include ophthalmologists are however needed in order to get a more complete picture of time impact of the EMR system on clinical workflow in eye hospitals.",
keywords = "Documentation time, Electronic medical records, India, Time effectiveness, Time-motion study",
author = "Shabbir, {Syed Abdul} and Ahmed, {Luai A.} and Sudhir, {Rachapalle Reddi} and Jeremiah Scholl and Li, {Yu Chuan} and Liou, {Der Ming}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.04.003",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "283--288",
journal = "Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine",
issn = "0169-2607",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of documentation time between an electronic and a paper-based record system by optometrists at an eye hospital in south India

T2 - A time-motion study

AU - Shabbir, Syed Abdul

AU - Ahmed, Luai A.

AU - Sudhir, Rachapalle Reddi

AU - Scholl, Jeremiah

AU - Li, Yu Chuan

AU - Liou, Der Ming

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Purpose: The adoption of electronic medical record (EMR) system is gradually increasing. However, various time-motion studies reveal conflicting data regarding time effectiveness on workflow due to computerization. One of the major issues for physicians is their uncertainty with EMRs' potential impact of time on workflow. A tertiary eye hospital in south India was in the process of implementing an EMR system in their ambulatory care unit. Many of the staff did not have previous computing experience and there were conflicting views on the time effectiveness of the computerized system after implementation. The management was thus interested to know the real time effectiveness of EMR in their hospital. The study compliments existing studies of this type by comparing the time efficiency of documentation time using EMR system with paper documentation in a hospital in a developing country where a transition between paper and EMR documentation was currently in progress. Methods: Ten randomly selected optometrists documented the time they spent during consultation with both paper and EMR documentation. The time spent was documented for a total of 200 records (100 EMR and 100 paper records). The independent-samples t-test and analysis of variance were used to compare the means of the consultation time and calculated documentation time spent between the electronic and paper records. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the time spent for documentation between electronic and paper records. The mean time spent in documenting electronic records was 0.92 min (95% CI -3.06 to 1.14) longer than in paper records. Conclusion: EMR systems can be adopted in eye hospitals without having significant negative impact on duration of consultation and documentation for optometrists. More time-motion studies that include ophthalmologists are however needed in order to get a more complete picture of time impact of the EMR system on clinical workflow in eye hospitals.

AB - Purpose: The adoption of electronic medical record (EMR) system is gradually increasing. However, various time-motion studies reveal conflicting data regarding time effectiveness on workflow due to computerization. One of the major issues for physicians is their uncertainty with EMRs' potential impact of time on workflow. A tertiary eye hospital in south India was in the process of implementing an EMR system in their ambulatory care unit. Many of the staff did not have previous computing experience and there were conflicting views on the time effectiveness of the computerized system after implementation. The management was thus interested to know the real time effectiveness of EMR in their hospital. The study compliments existing studies of this type by comparing the time efficiency of documentation time using EMR system with paper documentation in a hospital in a developing country where a transition between paper and EMR documentation was currently in progress. Methods: Ten randomly selected optometrists documented the time they spent during consultation with both paper and EMR documentation. The time spent was documented for a total of 200 records (100 EMR and 100 paper records). The independent-samples t-test and analysis of variance were used to compare the means of the consultation time and calculated documentation time spent between the electronic and paper records. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the time spent for documentation between electronic and paper records. The mean time spent in documenting electronic records was 0.92 min (95% CI -3.06 to 1.14) longer than in paper records. Conclusion: EMR systems can be adopted in eye hospitals without having significant negative impact on duration of consultation and documentation for optometrists. More time-motion studies that include ophthalmologists are however needed in order to get a more complete picture of time impact of the EMR system on clinical workflow in eye hospitals.

KW - Documentation time

KW - Electronic medical records

KW - India

KW - Time effectiveness

KW - Time-motion study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957908400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957908400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.04.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 20462653

AN - SCOPUS:77957908400

VL - 100

SP - 283

EP - 288

JO - Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

JF - Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

SN - 0169-2607

IS - 3

ER -