Comparison of dental surface image registration and fiducial marker registration: An in vivo accuracy study of static computer-assisted implant surgery

Yen Ting Han, Wei Chun Lin, Fang Yu Fan, Chih Long Chen, Chia Cheng Lin, Hsin Chung Cheng

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章同行評審

摘要

This study compared the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) planned through dental surface image registration and fiducial marker registration. Stone models of 30 patients were converted into digital dental casts by using a desktop scanner. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed and superimposed to the digital dental casts with two methods: matching the dental surface images or matching the fiducial markers on a stereolithographic radiographic template. Following the implant planning, stereolithographic surgical guides were fabricated, and 56 fully guided implants were inserted by the same doctor. Deviations between planned and inserted implants were measured and compared using postoperative CBCT images. After adjustment for other potential influencing factors, compared with the fiducial marker registration group, significantly larger mean lateral deviations were noted in the dental surface registration group at both the implant platform and apex (p = 0.0188 and 0.0371, respectively). However, the mean lateral deviations for the dental surface registration (0.83 ± 0.51 mm at implant platform and 1.24 ± 0.68 mm at implant apex) were comparable to the literature. In conclusion, our findings indicate that although sCAIS planned using dental surface image registration was not statistically as accurate as that using fiducial marker registration, its accuracy was satisfactory for clinical use.

原文英語
文章編號4183
期刊Journal of Clinical Medicine
10
發行號18
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 九月 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 醫藥 (全部)

指紋

深入研究「Comparison of dental surface image registration and fiducial marker registration: An in vivo accuracy study of static computer-assisted implant surgery」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此