Comparison of adrenaline injection and bipolar electrocoagulation for the arrest of peptic ulcer bleeding

H. J. Lin, G. Y. Tseng, C. L. Perng, F. Y. Lee, F. Y. Chang, S. D. Lee

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章同行評審

91 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Background - Peptic ulcers with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel require aggressive endoscopic treatment. Aims - To determine whether endoscopic adrenaline injection alone or contact probe therapy following injection is a suitable treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding. Methods - A total of 96 patients with active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessels received adrenaline alone, bipolar electrocoagulation alone, or combined treatment (n=32 in each group). Results - Initial haemostasis was not achieved in one patient in the adrenaline group, two in the gold probe group, and two in the injection gold probe group (p>0.1). Rebleeding episodes were fewer in the injection gold probe group (2/30, 6.7%) than in the gold probe group (9/30, 30%, p=0.04) and in the adrenaline group (11/31, 35.5%, p=0.01). Treatment failure (other therapy required) was rarer in the injection gold probe group (4/32, 12.5%) than in the adrenaline group (12/32, 37.5%, p=0.04). The volume of blood transfused after entry of the study was less in the injection gold probe group (mean 491 ml) than in the adrenaline group (1548 ml, p

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)715-719
頁數5
期刊Gut
44
發行號5
出版狀態已發佈 - 1999
對外發佈

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 消化內科

指紋

深入研究「Comparison of adrenaline injection and bipolar electrocoagulation for the arrest of peptic ulcer bleeding」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此