Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management: A cohort study

Hung-Yi Chiou, Li Hsuan Chiu, Ching Hui Chen, Yuan Kuei Yen, Ching Wen Chang, Wei-Min Liu

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

21 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Introduction: Robotic surgery has been applied in managing various types of gynecologic cancers. The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic surgery, laparoscopy and laparotomy for managing endometrial cancer. Methods: A total of 365 patients received surgical staging for treating IA to IIIC endometrial cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient demography, peri-operative parameters, and survival outcomes were studied. Results and discussions: Robotic surgery showed a significant lower blood loss and 24-hpain score as compared to other surgical types. Moreover, compared to laparotomy, robotic and laparoscopic surgeries were associated with reduced operation time, decreased time to full diet resumption, and shortened hospital stay. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of overall complication rate. Eighteen-month follow-up of the patients indicated no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion: Compared to conventional approaches, robotic surgery showed favorable short-term outcomes with comparable survival. It is suggested that robotic surgery is a feasible tool for endometrial cancer management.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)17-22
頁數6
期刊International Journal of Surgery
13
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 一月 1 2015

指紋

Robotics
Endometrial Neoplasms
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Cohort Studies
Survival
Disease-Free Survival
Length of Stay
Demography
Diet
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Endometrial cancer
  • Robotic surgery
  • Surgical staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

引用此文

Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management : A cohort study. / Chiou, Hung-Yi; Chiu, Li Hsuan; Chen, Ching Hui; Yen, Yuan Kuei; Chang, Ching Wen; Liu, Wei-Min.

於: International Journal of Surgery, 卷 13, 01.01.2015, p. 17-22.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

@article{46fe2c2ad5fd4d04a15ca8bb2bcfdc44,
title = "Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management: A cohort study",
abstract = "Introduction: Robotic surgery has been applied in managing various types of gynecologic cancers. The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic surgery, laparoscopy and laparotomy for managing endometrial cancer. Methods: A total of 365 patients received surgical staging for treating IA to IIIC endometrial cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient demography, peri-operative parameters, and survival outcomes were studied. Results and discussions: Robotic surgery showed a significant lower blood loss and 24-hpain score as compared to other surgical types. Moreover, compared to laparotomy, robotic and laparoscopic surgeries were associated with reduced operation time, decreased time to full diet resumption, and shortened hospital stay. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of overall complication rate. Eighteen-month follow-up of the patients indicated no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion: Compared to conventional approaches, robotic surgery showed favorable short-term outcomes with comparable survival. It is suggested that robotic surgery is a feasible tool for endometrial cancer management.",
keywords = "Endometrial cancer, Robotic surgery, Surgical staging, Endometrial cancer, Robotic surgery, Surgical staging",
author = "Hung-Yi Chiou and Chiu, {Li Hsuan} and Chen, {Ching Hui} and Yen, {Yuan Kuei} and Chang, {Ching Wen} and Wei-Min Liu",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.015",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "17--22",
journal = "International Journal of Surgery",
issn = "1743-9191",
publisher = "Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management

T2 - A cohort study

AU - Chiou, Hung-Yi

AU - Chiu, Li Hsuan

AU - Chen, Ching Hui

AU - Yen, Yuan Kuei

AU - Chang, Ching Wen

AU - Liu, Wei-Min

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Robotic surgery has been applied in managing various types of gynecologic cancers. The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic surgery, laparoscopy and laparotomy for managing endometrial cancer. Methods: A total of 365 patients received surgical staging for treating IA to IIIC endometrial cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient demography, peri-operative parameters, and survival outcomes were studied. Results and discussions: Robotic surgery showed a significant lower blood loss and 24-hpain score as compared to other surgical types. Moreover, compared to laparotomy, robotic and laparoscopic surgeries were associated with reduced operation time, decreased time to full diet resumption, and shortened hospital stay. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of overall complication rate. Eighteen-month follow-up of the patients indicated no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion: Compared to conventional approaches, robotic surgery showed favorable short-term outcomes with comparable survival. It is suggested that robotic surgery is a feasible tool for endometrial cancer management.

AB - Introduction: Robotic surgery has been applied in managing various types of gynecologic cancers. The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic surgery, laparoscopy and laparotomy for managing endometrial cancer. Methods: A total of 365 patients received surgical staging for treating IA to IIIC endometrial cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient demography, peri-operative parameters, and survival outcomes were studied. Results and discussions: Robotic surgery showed a significant lower blood loss and 24-hpain score as compared to other surgical types. Moreover, compared to laparotomy, robotic and laparoscopic surgeries were associated with reduced operation time, decreased time to full diet resumption, and shortened hospital stay. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of overall complication rate. Eighteen-month follow-up of the patients indicated no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion: Compared to conventional approaches, robotic surgery showed favorable short-term outcomes with comparable survival. It is suggested that robotic surgery is a feasible tool for endometrial cancer management.

KW - Endometrial cancer

KW - Robotic surgery

KW - Surgical staging

KW - Endometrial cancer

KW - Robotic surgery

KW - Surgical staging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921502167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.scopus.com/results/citedbyresults.uri?sort=plf-f&cite=2-s2.0-84921502167&src=s&imp=t&sid=130009353EA84D4AA553000A46A59BA3.FZg2ODcJC9ArCe8WOZPvA%3a940&sot=cite&sdt=a&sl=0&origin=recordpage&editSaveSearch=&txGid=0

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 25463760

AN - SCOPUS:84921502167

VL - 13

SP - 17

EP - 22

JO - International Journal of Surgery

JF - International Journal of Surgery

SN - 1743-9191

ER -