Carotid angioplasty with or without stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis: A meta-analysis

Jiann Shing Jeng, Hon Man Liu, Yong Kwang Tu

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

25 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Carotid angioplasty with or without stent placement (CAS) has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for revascularization of severe carotid artery stenosis in patients with high risk for surgery. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of both treatments from data for previous randomized trials. We did a literature search using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane database, and relevant articles for randomized trials comparing CAS with CEA. A meta-analysis using both random-effects and fixed-effects models compared outcome events of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and cranial nerve injury at 30 days, 6 months, or 1 year after procedure. A total of nine trials involving 3138 patients (1564, CEA; 1574, CAS) with symptomatic or asymptomatic stenosis were included for analysis. By random-effects model, there was no significant difference of event rates between treatments for any stroke (odds ratio for CAS [95% confidence interval], 1.46 [0.91-2.36]), death or any stroke (1.37 [0.90-2.10]), or death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction (1.02 [0.49-2.11]) at 30-day, and death and any stroke at 6 months (1.50 [0.69-3.23]) or 1 year (1.25 [0.59-2.63]). But, there were significantly higher 30-day event rates after CAS than CEA for death or any stroke (1.37 [1.04-1.81]) by fix-effects model, accompanied with significant heterogeneity (p = 0.04). Risk of cranial nerve injury was much lower in CAS than in CEA (0.12 [0.05-0.29]). Except for lower risk of cranial nerve injury, CAS is neither safer nor associated with a better short-term outcome as compared to CEA in treating carotid artery stenosis.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)40-47
頁數8
期刊Journal of the Neurological Sciences
270
發行號1-2
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 七月 15 2008
對外發佈Yes

指紋

Carotid Endarterectomy
Carotid Stenosis
Angioplasty
Meta-Analysis
Cranial Nerve Injuries
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
PubMed
Stents
Pathologic Constriction
Odds Ratio
Databases
Confidence Intervals
Safety
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ageing
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

引用此文

Carotid angioplasty with or without stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis : A meta-analysis. / Jeng, Jiann Shing; Liu, Hon Man; Tu, Yong Kwang.

於: Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 卷 270, 編號 1-2, 15.07.2008, p. 40-47.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

@article{aec670792aab47ef9974b1c0fe778151,
title = "Carotid angioplasty with or without stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Carotid angioplasty with or without stent placement (CAS) has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for revascularization of severe carotid artery stenosis in patients with high risk for surgery. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of both treatments from data for previous randomized trials. We did a literature search using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane database, and relevant articles for randomized trials comparing CAS with CEA. A meta-analysis using both random-effects and fixed-effects models compared outcome events of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and cranial nerve injury at 30 days, 6 months, or 1 year after procedure. A total of nine trials involving 3138 patients (1564, CEA; 1574, CAS) with symptomatic or asymptomatic stenosis were included for analysis. By random-effects model, there was no significant difference of event rates between treatments for any stroke (odds ratio for CAS [95{\%} confidence interval], 1.46 [0.91-2.36]), death or any stroke (1.37 [0.90-2.10]), or death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction (1.02 [0.49-2.11]) at 30-day, and death and any stroke at 6 months (1.50 [0.69-3.23]) or 1 year (1.25 [0.59-2.63]). But, there were significantly higher 30-day event rates after CAS than CEA for death or any stroke (1.37 [1.04-1.81]) by fix-effects model, accompanied with significant heterogeneity (p = 0.04). Risk of cranial nerve injury was much lower in CAS than in CEA (0.12 [0.05-0.29]). Except for lower risk of cranial nerve injury, CAS is neither safer nor associated with a better short-term outcome as compared to CEA in treating carotid artery stenosis.",
keywords = "Angioplasty, Carotid artery, Carotid endarterectomy, Stents",
author = "Jeng, {Jiann Shing} and Liu, {Hon Man} and Tu, {Yong Kwang}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jns.2008.01.012",
language = "English",
volume = "270",
pages = "40--47",
journal = "Journal of the Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0022-510X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carotid angioplasty with or without stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Jeng, Jiann Shing

AU - Liu, Hon Man

AU - Tu, Yong Kwang

PY - 2008/7/15

Y1 - 2008/7/15

N2 - Carotid angioplasty with or without stent placement (CAS) has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for revascularization of severe carotid artery stenosis in patients with high risk for surgery. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of both treatments from data for previous randomized trials. We did a literature search using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane database, and relevant articles for randomized trials comparing CAS with CEA. A meta-analysis using both random-effects and fixed-effects models compared outcome events of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and cranial nerve injury at 30 days, 6 months, or 1 year after procedure. A total of nine trials involving 3138 patients (1564, CEA; 1574, CAS) with symptomatic or asymptomatic stenosis were included for analysis. By random-effects model, there was no significant difference of event rates between treatments for any stroke (odds ratio for CAS [95% confidence interval], 1.46 [0.91-2.36]), death or any stroke (1.37 [0.90-2.10]), or death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction (1.02 [0.49-2.11]) at 30-day, and death and any stroke at 6 months (1.50 [0.69-3.23]) or 1 year (1.25 [0.59-2.63]). But, there were significantly higher 30-day event rates after CAS than CEA for death or any stroke (1.37 [1.04-1.81]) by fix-effects model, accompanied with significant heterogeneity (p = 0.04). Risk of cranial nerve injury was much lower in CAS than in CEA (0.12 [0.05-0.29]). Except for lower risk of cranial nerve injury, CAS is neither safer nor associated with a better short-term outcome as compared to CEA in treating carotid artery stenosis.

AB - Carotid angioplasty with or without stent placement (CAS) has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for revascularization of severe carotid artery stenosis in patients with high risk for surgery. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of both treatments from data for previous randomized trials. We did a literature search using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane database, and relevant articles for randomized trials comparing CAS with CEA. A meta-analysis using both random-effects and fixed-effects models compared outcome events of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and cranial nerve injury at 30 days, 6 months, or 1 year after procedure. A total of nine trials involving 3138 patients (1564, CEA; 1574, CAS) with symptomatic or asymptomatic stenosis were included for analysis. By random-effects model, there was no significant difference of event rates between treatments for any stroke (odds ratio for CAS [95% confidence interval], 1.46 [0.91-2.36]), death or any stroke (1.37 [0.90-2.10]), or death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction (1.02 [0.49-2.11]) at 30-day, and death and any stroke at 6 months (1.50 [0.69-3.23]) or 1 year (1.25 [0.59-2.63]). But, there were significantly higher 30-day event rates after CAS than CEA for death or any stroke (1.37 [1.04-1.81]) by fix-effects model, accompanied with significant heterogeneity (p = 0.04). Risk of cranial nerve injury was much lower in CAS than in CEA (0.12 [0.05-0.29]). Except for lower risk of cranial nerve injury, CAS is neither safer nor associated with a better short-term outcome as compared to CEA in treating carotid artery stenosis.

KW - Angioplasty

KW - Carotid artery

KW - Carotid endarterectomy

KW - Stents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649086431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44649086431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2008.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2008.01.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 18304582

AN - SCOPUS:44649086431

VL - 270

SP - 40

EP - 47

JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

SN - 0022-510X

IS - 1-2

ER -