An overview of Taiwanese land law and dispute resolution

Po Fang Tsai, Duan Lin

研究成果: 書貢獻/報告類型章節

摘要

People in Taiwan rarely look to land law to resolve land disputes, because for centuries such disputes were settled without recourse to formal law. There were no clearly defined land laws in Taiwan before 1949. The Qing Dynasty had no land laws that resembled land titling in Western legal systems, and the Japanese colonial government confined land governance to the colonial system. Clearly defined and generally applicable land laws were not introduced until the Kuomintang (KMT) government after 1949. Unfortunately, over the past sixty years of KMT land governance, the land laws did not function well. This chapter suggests two reasons for this failure. First, rather than amending the land law to address regulatory problems, the KMT government introduced confusing and contradictory special laws. Second, the land law did not remain relevant to rapid social and economic changes during this period. To understand how these two factors have influenced land governance, it is necessary to examine how land law functioned in different historical periods. Land law and dispute resolution in Taiwan have been decoupling since the nineteenth century. The state system governing dispute resolution evolved separately from the land law system. The legal systems (prior to 1945) followed the traditional Chinese law system and colonial law, which lasted from the late Qing Dynasty to the Japanese colonial regime, and the legal system of the authoritarian regime of the KMT underwent a democratic transformation in the last decade of the twentieth century.

原文英語
主出版物標題Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law
發行者Cambridge University Press
頁面317-330
頁數14
ISBN(列印)9781107589193, 9781107066823
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 2014
對外發佈Yes

指紋

land law
legal system
Taiwan
Law
governance
regime
colonial government
recourse
economic change
social change
nineteenth century
twentieth century

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

引用此文

Tsai, P. F., & Lin, D. (2014). An overview of Taiwanese land law and dispute resolution. 於 Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law (頁 317-330). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589193.017

An overview of Taiwanese land law and dispute resolution. / Tsai, Po Fang; Lin, Duan.

Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law. Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 317-330.

研究成果: 書貢獻/報告類型章節

Tsai, PF & Lin, D 2014, An overview of Taiwanese land law and dispute resolution. 於 Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law. Cambridge University Press, 頁 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589193.017
Tsai PF, Lin D. An overview of Taiwanese land law and dispute resolution. 於 Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law. Cambridge University Press. 2014. p. 317-330 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589193.017
Tsai, Po Fang ; Lin, Duan. / An overview of Taiwanese land law and dispute resolution. Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 頁 317-330
@inbook{e8acee2b01ae411f9472535cf42aecb8,
title = "An overview of Taiwanese land law and dispute resolution",
abstract = "People in Taiwan rarely look to land law to resolve land disputes, because for centuries such disputes were settled without recourse to formal law. There were no clearly defined land laws in Taiwan before 1949. The Qing Dynasty had no land laws that resembled land titling in Western legal systems, and the Japanese colonial government confined land governance to the colonial system. Clearly defined and generally applicable land laws were not introduced until the Kuomintang (KMT) government after 1949. Unfortunately, over the past sixty years of KMT land governance, the land laws did not function well. This chapter suggests two reasons for this failure. First, rather than amending the land law to address regulatory problems, the KMT government introduced confusing and contradictory special laws. Second, the land law did not remain relevant to rapid social and economic changes during this period. To understand how these two factors have influenced land governance, it is necessary to examine how land law functioned in different historical periods. Land law and dispute resolution in Taiwan have been decoupling since the nineteenth century. The state system governing dispute resolution evolved separately from the land law system. The legal systems (prior to 1945) followed the traditional Chinese law system and colonial law, which lasted from the late Qing Dynasty to the Japanese colonial regime, and the legal system of the authoritarian regime of the KMT underwent a democratic transformation in the last decade of the twentieth century.",
author = "Tsai, {Po Fang} and Duan Lin",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107589193.017",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781107589193",
pages = "317--330",
booktitle = "Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - An overview of Taiwanese land law and dispute resolution

AU - Tsai, Po Fang

AU - Lin, Duan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - People in Taiwan rarely look to land law to resolve land disputes, because for centuries such disputes were settled without recourse to formal law. There were no clearly defined land laws in Taiwan before 1949. The Qing Dynasty had no land laws that resembled land titling in Western legal systems, and the Japanese colonial government confined land governance to the colonial system. Clearly defined and generally applicable land laws were not introduced until the Kuomintang (KMT) government after 1949. Unfortunately, over the past sixty years of KMT land governance, the land laws did not function well. This chapter suggests two reasons for this failure. First, rather than amending the land law to address regulatory problems, the KMT government introduced confusing and contradictory special laws. Second, the land law did not remain relevant to rapid social and economic changes during this period. To understand how these two factors have influenced land governance, it is necessary to examine how land law functioned in different historical periods. Land law and dispute resolution in Taiwan have been decoupling since the nineteenth century. The state system governing dispute resolution evolved separately from the land law system. The legal systems (prior to 1945) followed the traditional Chinese law system and colonial law, which lasted from the late Qing Dynasty to the Japanese colonial regime, and the legal system of the authoritarian regime of the KMT underwent a democratic transformation in the last decade of the twentieth century.

AB - People in Taiwan rarely look to land law to resolve land disputes, because for centuries such disputes were settled without recourse to formal law. There were no clearly defined land laws in Taiwan before 1949. The Qing Dynasty had no land laws that resembled land titling in Western legal systems, and the Japanese colonial government confined land governance to the colonial system. Clearly defined and generally applicable land laws were not introduced until the Kuomintang (KMT) government after 1949. Unfortunately, over the past sixty years of KMT land governance, the land laws did not function well. This chapter suggests two reasons for this failure. First, rather than amending the land law to address regulatory problems, the KMT government introduced confusing and contradictory special laws. Second, the land law did not remain relevant to rapid social and economic changes during this period. To understand how these two factors have influenced land governance, it is necessary to examine how land law functioned in different historical periods. Land law and dispute resolution in Taiwan have been decoupling since the nineteenth century. The state system governing dispute resolution evolved separately from the land law system. The legal systems (prior to 1945) followed the traditional Chinese law system and colonial law, which lasted from the late Qing Dynasty to the Japanese colonial regime, and the legal system of the authoritarian regime of the KMT underwent a democratic transformation in the last decade of the twentieth century.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923536491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923536491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107589193.017

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107589193.017

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923536491

SN - 9781107589193

SN - 9781107066823

SP - 317

EP - 330

BT - Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -