Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces

Ching Yu Yen, Po Jan Kuo, Chi Yu Lin, Nancy Nie-Shiuh Chang, Hsiang Yin Hsiao, Yu Tang Chin, Chi Chun Tsai, Sheng Yang Lee

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

摘要

Background/purpose: To evaluate the measurement accuracy of hard-tissue thicknesses adjacent to dental implants with different thread designs on images obtained from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro model. Materials and methods: On 4 × 13-mm implant, the neck of the implant was designed with micro-threads, and the apical part was covered by macro-threads; these implants were placed in a vinyl polysiloxane block that mimicked hard-tissue. Models were prepared with various thicknesses of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.3 mm adjacent to the dental implant. Each model was scanned using CBCT, and the thickness of the cortical bone from the outer surface of the micro-threads and macro-threads were recorded. Ground sections were prepared, and the thickness was measured with electronic calipers as the gold standard (GS) measurement. Results: CBCT measurements of the micro-thread surface were consistently underestimated compared to the GS measurement when the thickness of the hard-tissue-mimicking material was ≤1.0 mm. In comparison, CBCT measurements of the macro-thread surface closely approximated the standard measurement, except when the thickness of the hard-tissue-mimicking material was 0.3 mm. The mean percentage errors from the standard measurement for the 2.0-, 1.0-, 0.5-, and 0.3-mm thickness groups were 4.8%, 16.4%, 37.8%, and 92.6%, respectively, for the micro-thread group, and were 0.6%, 2.9%, 9.5%, and 40.8%, respectively, for the macro-thread group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that CBCT may not produce sufficient resolution for thin sections of hard tissue-mimicking materials adjacent to micro-thread surfaces.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)119-125
頁數7
期刊Journal of Dental Sciences
14
發行號2
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 六月 1 2019

指紋

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dental Implants
Neck

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

引用此文

Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces. / Yen, Ching Yu; Kuo, Po Jan; Lin, Chi Yu; Nie-Shiuh Chang, Nancy; Hsiao, Hsiang Yin; Chin, Yu Tang; Tsai, Chi Chun; Lee, Sheng Yang.

於: Journal of Dental Sciences, 卷 14, 編號 2, 01.06.2019, p. 119-125.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

@article{e83159e427b04cd593067b3035656a18,
title = "Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces",
abstract = "Background/purpose: To evaluate the measurement accuracy of hard-tissue thicknesses adjacent to dental implants with different thread designs on images obtained from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro model. Materials and methods: On 4 × 13-mm implant, the neck of the implant was designed with micro-threads, and the apical part was covered by macro-threads; these implants were placed in a vinyl polysiloxane block that mimicked hard-tissue. Models were prepared with various thicknesses of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.3 mm adjacent to the dental implant. Each model was scanned using CBCT, and the thickness of the cortical bone from the outer surface of the micro-threads and macro-threads were recorded. Ground sections were prepared, and the thickness was measured with electronic calipers as the gold standard (GS) measurement. Results: CBCT measurements of the micro-thread surface were consistently underestimated compared to the GS measurement when the thickness of the hard-tissue-mimicking material was ≤1.0 mm. In comparison, CBCT measurements of the macro-thread surface closely approximated the standard measurement, except when the thickness of the hard-tissue-mimicking material was 0.3 mm. The mean percentage errors from the standard measurement for the 2.0-, 1.0-, 0.5-, and 0.3-mm thickness groups were 4.8{\%}, 16.4{\%}, 37.8{\%}, and 92.6{\%}, respectively, for the micro-thread group, and were 0.6{\%}, 2.9{\%}, 9.5{\%}, and 40.8{\%}, respectively, for the macro-thread group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that CBCT may not produce sufficient resolution for thin sections of hard tissue-mimicking materials adjacent to micro-thread surfaces.",
keywords = "Bone thickness, Cone beam computed tomography, Dental implant",
author = "Yen, {Ching Yu} and Kuo, {Po Jan} and Lin, {Chi Yu} and {Nie-Shiuh Chang}, Nancy and Hsiao, {Hsiang Yin} and Chin, {Yu Tang} and Tsai, {Chi Chun} and Lee, {Sheng Yang}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.001",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "119--125",
journal = "Journal of Dental Sciences",
issn = "1991-7902",
publisher = "中華牙醫學會",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces

AU - Yen, Ching Yu

AU - Kuo, Po Jan

AU - Lin, Chi Yu

AU - Nie-Shiuh Chang, Nancy

AU - Hsiao, Hsiang Yin

AU - Chin, Yu Tang

AU - Tsai, Chi Chun

AU - Lee, Sheng Yang

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Background/purpose: To evaluate the measurement accuracy of hard-tissue thicknesses adjacent to dental implants with different thread designs on images obtained from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro model. Materials and methods: On 4 × 13-mm implant, the neck of the implant was designed with micro-threads, and the apical part was covered by macro-threads; these implants were placed in a vinyl polysiloxane block that mimicked hard-tissue. Models were prepared with various thicknesses of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.3 mm adjacent to the dental implant. Each model was scanned using CBCT, and the thickness of the cortical bone from the outer surface of the micro-threads and macro-threads were recorded. Ground sections were prepared, and the thickness was measured with electronic calipers as the gold standard (GS) measurement. Results: CBCT measurements of the micro-thread surface were consistently underestimated compared to the GS measurement when the thickness of the hard-tissue-mimicking material was ≤1.0 mm. In comparison, CBCT measurements of the macro-thread surface closely approximated the standard measurement, except when the thickness of the hard-tissue-mimicking material was 0.3 mm. The mean percentage errors from the standard measurement for the 2.0-, 1.0-, 0.5-, and 0.3-mm thickness groups were 4.8%, 16.4%, 37.8%, and 92.6%, respectively, for the micro-thread group, and were 0.6%, 2.9%, 9.5%, and 40.8%, respectively, for the macro-thread group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that CBCT may not produce sufficient resolution for thin sections of hard tissue-mimicking materials adjacent to micro-thread surfaces.

AB - Background/purpose: To evaluate the measurement accuracy of hard-tissue thicknesses adjacent to dental implants with different thread designs on images obtained from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro model. Materials and methods: On 4 × 13-mm implant, the neck of the implant was designed with micro-threads, and the apical part was covered by macro-threads; these implants were placed in a vinyl polysiloxane block that mimicked hard-tissue. Models were prepared with various thicknesses of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.3 mm adjacent to the dental implant. Each model was scanned using CBCT, and the thickness of the cortical bone from the outer surface of the micro-threads and macro-threads were recorded. Ground sections were prepared, and the thickness was measured with electronic calipers as the gold standard (GS) measurement. Results: CBCT measurements of the micro-thread surface were consistently underestimated compared to the GS measurement when the thickness of the hard-tissue-mimicking material was ≤1.0 mm. In comparison, CBCT measurements of the macro-thread surface closely approximated the standard measurement, except when the thickness of the hard-tissue-mimicking material was 0.3 mm. The mean percentage errors from the standard measurement for the 2.0-, 1.0-, 0.5-, and 0.3-mm thickness groups were 4.8%, 16.4%, 37.8%, and 92.6%, respectively, for the micro-thread group, and were 0.6%, 2.9%, 9.5%, and 40.8%, respectively, for the macro-thread group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that CBCT may not produce sufficient resolution for thin sections of hard tissue-mimicking materials adjacent to micro-thread surfaces.

KW - Bone thickness

KW - Cone beam computed tomography

KW - Dental implant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065466986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065466986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065466986

VL - 14

SP - 119

EP - 125

JO - Journal of Dental Sciences

JF - Journal of Dental Sciences

SN - 1991-7902

IS - 2

ER -