A systematic review and meta-analysis of guided tissue regeneration/osseous grafting for the treatment of Class II furcation defects

Tsung Hung Chen, Yu Kang Tu, Chia Chen Yen, Hsein Kun Lu

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻回顧型文獻

9 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Background/purpose The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of the clinical evidence on the efficacy of guide tissue regeneration (GTR) with/without osseous grafting (OG) in treating periodontal furcation Class II defects. Materials and methods Reports from randomized controlled clinical trials, with at least 6 months follow-up, comparing open flap debridement (OFD); GTR, and GTR + OG were located from various sources. Sources included the electronic databases of Cochrane Oral Health Group specialist trials register, MEDLINE, and PubMed; in addition, journal archives were hand-searched. Trials up to and including March 2012 were included. Using the PICO (Patient or Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) question format, data from eligible articles were extracted and meta-analyzed. The outcomes measures were furcation closure rate, vertical/horizontal bone fill (re-entry), and vertical/horizontal attachment level gain. Results The meta-analysis showed that the GTR and GTR + OG groups obtained greater furcation closure rate, vertical/horizontal bone fill, and vertical/horizontal attachment level gain than the OFD group in mandibular molars. The GTR group obtained greater vertical/horizontal bone fill and vertical attachment level gain than the OFD group in maxillary molars. The GTR + OG group achieved better clinical outcomes than the GTR group did in all the comparing outcomes in mandibular molars. Conclusion GTR technique seemed to be more effective than OFD for resolving Class II periodontal furcation defects, and the GTR + OG technique showed even better clinical results. The outcomes were better for mandibular molars than for maxillary molars.
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)209-224
頁數16
期刊Journal of Dental Sciences
8
發行號3
DOIs
出版狀態已發佈 - 九月 2013

指紋

Furcation Defects
Guided Tissue Regeneration
Meta-Analysis
Regeneration
Debridement
Therapeutics
Bone and Bones
Oral Health
PubMed
MEDLINE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

引用此文

A systematic review and meta-analysis of guided tissue regeneration/osseous grafting for the treatment of Class II furcation defects. / Chen, Tsung Hung; Tu, Yu Kang; Yen, Chia Chen; Lu, Hsein Kun.

於: Journal of Dental Sciences, 卷 8, 編號 3, 09.2013, p. 209-224.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻回顧型文獻

@article{485fdf33a9b54b5795905504aa90e4d5,
title = "A systematic review and meta-analysis of guided tissue regeneration/osseous grafting for the treatment of Class II furcation defects",
abstract = "Background/purpose The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of the clinical evidence on the efficacy of guide tissue regeneration (GTR) with/without osseous grafting (OG) in treating periodontal furcation Class II defects. Materials and methods Reports from randomized controlled clinical trials, with at least 6 months follow-up, comparing open flap debridement (OFD); GTR, and GTR + OG were located from various sources. Sources included the electronic databases of Cochrane Oral Health Group specialist trials register, MEDLINE, and PubMed; in addition, journal archives were hand-searched. Trials up to and including March 2012 were included. Using the PICO (Patient or Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) question format, data from eligible articles were extracted and meta-analyzed. The outcomes measures were furcation closure rate, vertical/horizontal bone fill (re-entry), and vertical/horizontal attachment level gain. Results The meta-analysis showed that the GTR and GTR + OG groups obtained greater furcation closure rate, vertical/horizontal bone fill, and vertical/horizontal attachment level gain than the OFD group in mandibular molars. The GTR group obtained greater vertical/horizontal bone fill and vertical attachment level gain than the OFD group in maxillary molars. The GTR + OG group achieved better clinical outcomes than the GTR group did in all the comparing outcomes in mandibular molars. Conclusion GTR technique seemed to be more effective than OFD for resolving Class II periodontal furcation defects, and the GTR + OG technique showed even better clinical results. The outcomes were better for mandibular molars than for maxillary molars.",
keywords = "bone grafting, furcation defects, guided tissue regeneration, meta-analysis, systematic review",
author = "Chen, {Tsung Hung} and Tu, {Yu Kang} and Yen, {Chia Chen} and Lu, {Hsein Kun}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jds.2013.06.006",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "209--224",
journal = "Journal of Dental Sciences",
issn = "1991-7902",
publisher = "中華牙醫學會",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of guided tissue regeneration/osseous grafting for the treatment of Class II furcation defects

AU - Chen, Tsung Hung

AU - Tu, Yu Kang

AU - Yen, Chia Chen

AU - Lu, Hsein Kun

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Background/purpose The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of the clinical evidence on the efficacy of guide tissue regeneration (GTR) with/without osseous grafting (OG) in treating periodontal furcation Class II defects. Materials and methods Reports from randomized controlled clinical trials, with at least 6 months follow-up, comparing open flap debridement (OFD); GTR, and GTR + OG were located from various sources. Sources included the electronic databases of Cochrane Oral Health Group specialist trials register, MEDLINE, and PubMed; in addition, journal archives were hand-searched. Trials up to and including March 2012 were included. Using the PICO (Patient or Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) question format, data from eligible articles were extracted and meta-analyzed. The outcomes measures were furcation closure rate, vertical/horizontal bone fill (re-entry), and vertical/horizontal attachment level gain. Results The meta-analysis showed that the GTR and GTR + OG groups obtained greater furcation closure rate, vertical/horizontal bone fill, and vertical/horizontal attachment level gain than the OFD group in mandibular molars. The GTR group obtained greater vertical/horizontal bone fill and vertical attachment level gain than the OFD group in maxillary molars. The GTR + OG group achieved better clinical outcomes than the GTR group did in all the comparing outcomes in mandibular molars. Conclusion GTR technique seemed to be more effective than OFD for resolving Class II periodontal furcation defects, and the GTR + OG technique showed even better clinical results. The outcomes were better for mandibular molars than for maxillary molars.

AB - Background/purpose The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of the clinical evidence on the efficacy of guide tissue regeneration (GTR) with/without osseous grafting (OG) in treating periodontal furcation Class II defects. Materials and methods Reports from randomized controlled clinical trials, with at least 6 months follow-up, comparing open flap debridement (OFD); GTR, and GTR + OG were located from various sources. Sources included the electronic databases of Cochrane Oral Health Group specialist trials register, MEDLINE, and PubMed; in addition, journal archives were hand-searched. Trials up to and including March 2012 were included. Using the PICO (Patient or Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) question format, data from eligible articles were extracted and meta-analyzed. The outcomes measures were furcation closure rate, vertical/horizontal bone fill (re-entry), and vertical/horizontal attachment level gain. Results The meta-analysis showed that the GTR and GTR + OG groups obtained greater furcation closure rate, vertical/horizontal bone fill, and vertical/horizontal attachment level gain than the OFD group in mandibular molars. The GTR group obtained greater vertical/horizontal bone fill and vertical attachment level gain than the OFD group in maxillary molars. The GTR + OG group achieved better clinical outcomes than the GTR group did in all the comparing outcomes in mandibular molars. Conclusion GTR technique seemed to be more effective than OFD for resolving Class II periodontal furcation defects, and the GTR + OG technique showed even better clinical results. The outcomes were better for mandibular molars than for maxillary molars.

KW - bone grafting

KW - furcation defects

KW - guided tissue regeneration

KW - meta-analysis

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885085687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885085687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jds.2013.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jds.2013.06.006

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84885085687

VL - 8

SP - 209

EP - 224

JO - Journal of Dental Sciences

JF - Journal of Dental Sciences

SN - 1991-7902

IS - 3

ER -