透析病患之生活品質及其相關因素探討

鈕淑芬

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the life quality and its correlators on patients who received different dialysis therapies. This is a cross-sectional descriptive and correlational research. Eighty patients from each hemodialysis renal replacement therapy and continuous-ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) from a medical center were recruited. The study instruments used in the study were “WHO QOL-BREF” and “Physical Symptom Distress Scale.” Statistical methods of means, percentage, chi-square and Pearson’s correlation were used to analyze the research data. The significant major findings of this study were as follows: 1.The quality of life score for hemodialysis and CAPD patients provided no significant differences. 2.Physical symptom distress was negatively correlated with quality of life, which means the more distress patients feel the worse quality of life they experienced. 3.There were statistically significant differences between variables such as family income, duration of using the current renal treatment, previous methods of replacement therapy, and types of dialysis therapy (P<.05). The results of this study provide useful references while making suggestion for nursing education, practice and nursing administration.
原文繁體中文
頁(從 - 到)88-101
頁數14
期刊臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌
3
發行號2
出版狀態已發佈 - 2004
對外發佈Yes

Keywords

  • 腎臟替代療法
  • 透析療法
  • 生活品質
  • 身體症狀困擾

引用此文

透析病患之生活品質及其相關因素探討. / 鈕淑芬.

於: 臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌, 卷 3, 編號 2, 2004, p. 88-101.

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章

鈕淑芬. / 透析病患之生活品質及其相關因素探討. 於: 臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌. 2004 ; 卷 3, 編號 2. 頁 88-101.
@article{410d6219f66d4843ac772b47eb4e585e,
title = "透析病患之生活品質及其相關因素探討",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the life quality and its correlators on patients who received different dialysis therapies. This is a cross-sectional descriptive and correlational research. Eighty patients from each hemodialysis renal replacement therapy and continuous-ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) from a medical center were recruited. The study instruments used in the study were “WHO QOL-BREF” and “Physical Symptom Distress Scale.” Statistical methods of means, percentage, chi-square and Pearson’s correlation were used to analyze the research data. The significant major findings of this study were as follows: 1.The quality of life score for hemodialysis and CAPD patients provided no significant differences. 2.Physical symptom distress was negatively correlated with quality of life, which means the more distress patients feel the worse quality of life they experienced. 3.There were statistically significant differences between variables such as family income, duration of using the current renal treatment, previous methods of replacement therapy, and types of dialysis therapy (P<.05). The results of this study provide useful references while making suggestion for nursing education, practice and nursing administration.",
keywords = "腎臟替代療法, 透析療法, 生活品質, 身體症狀困擾, renal replacement therapies, dialysis therapies, quality of life, physical symptom distress",
author = "鈕淑芬",
year = "2004",
language = "繁體中文",
volume = "3",
pages = "88--101",
journal = "臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌",
issn = "1726-7404",
publisher = "臺灣腎臟護理學會",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 透析病患之生活品質及其相關因素探討

AU - 鈕淑芬, null

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the life quality and its correlators on patients who received different dialysis therapies. This is a cross-sectional descriptive and correlational research. Eighty patients from each hemodialysis renal replacement therapy and continuous-ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) from a medical center were recruited. The study instruments used in the study were “WHO QOL-BREF” and “Physical Symptom Distress Scale.” Statistical methods of means, percentage, chi-square and Pearson’s correlation were used to analyze the research data. The significant major findings of this study were as follows: 1.The quality of life score for hemodialysis and CAPD patients provided no significant differences. 2.Physical symptom distress was negatively correlated with quality of life, which means the more distress patients feel the worse quality of life they experienced. 3.There were statistically significant differences between variables such as family income, duration of using the current renal treatment, previous methods of replacement therapy, and types of dialysis therapy (P<.05). The results of this study provide useful references while making suggestion for nursing education, practice and nursing administration.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the life quality and its correlators on patients who received different dialysis therapies. This is a cross-sectional descriptive and correlational research. Eighty patients from each hemodialysis renal replacement therapy and continuous-ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) from a medical center were recruited. The study instruments used in the study were “WHO QOL-BREF” and “Physical Symptom Distress Scale.” Statistical methods of means, percentage, chi-square and Pearson’s correlation were used to analyze the research data. The significant major findings of this study were as follows: 1.The quality of life score for hemodialysis and CAPD patients provided no significant differences. 2.Physical symptom distress was negatively correlated with quality of life, which means the more distress patients feel the worse quality of life they experienced. 3.There were statistically significant differences between variables such as family income, duration of using the current renal treatment, previous methods of replacement therapy, and types of dialysis therapy (P<.05). The results of this study provide useful references while making suggestion for nursing education, practice and nursing administration.

KW - 腎臟替代療法

KW - 透析療法

KW - 生活品質

KW - 身體症狀困擾

KW - renal replacement therapies

KW - dialysis therapies

KW - quality of life

KW - physical symptom distress

M3 - 文章

VL - 3

SP - 88

EP - 101

JO - 臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌

JF - 臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌

SN - 1726-7404

IS - 2

ER -