What is neurophilosophy? A methodological account

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The term “neurophilosophy” is often used either implicitly or explicitly for characterizing the investigation of philosophical theories in relation to neuroscientific hypotheses. The exact methodological principles and systematic rules for a linkage between philosophical theories and neuroscientific hypothesis, however, remain to be clarified. The present contribution focuses on these principles, as well as on the relation between ontology and epistemology and the characterization of hypothesis in neurophilosophy. Principles of transdisciplinary methodology include the ‘principle of asymmetry’, the ‘principle of bi-directionality’ and the ‘principle of transdisciplinary circularity’. The ‘principle of asymmetry’ points to an asymmetric relationship between logical and natural conditions. The ‘principle of bi-directionality’ claims for the necessity of bi-directional linkage between natural and logical conditions. The ‘principle of transdisciplinary circularity’ describes systematic rules for mutual comparison and cross-conditional exchange between philosophical theory and neuroscientific hypotheses. The relation between ontology and epistemology no longer is determined by ontological presuppositions i.e. “ontological primacy”. Instead, there is correspondence between different ‘epistemological capacities’ and different kinds of ontology which consecutively results in “epistemic primacy” and “ontological pluralism”. The present contribution concludes by rejecting some so-called ‘standard-arguments’ including the ‘argument of circularity’, the ‘argument of categorical fallacy’, the ‘argument of validity’ and the ‘argument of necessity’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-127
Number of pages37
JournalJournal for General Philosophy of Science
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

transdisciplinary
ontology
epistemology
asymmetry
present
pluralism
methodology
Ontology
Philosophical Theories
Circularity
Ontological

Keywords

  • Epistemology
  • Neurophilosophical hypothesis
  • Neurophilosophy
  • Ontology
  • Principles
  • Standard-arguments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

What is neurophilosophy? A methodological account. / Northoff, Georg.

In: Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 91-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a743ad03409c4a7389116cae60d28bd1,
title = "What is neurophilosophy? A methodological account",
abstract = "The term “neurophilosophy” is often used either implicitly or explicitly for characterizing the investigation of philosophical theories in relation to neuroscientific hypotheses. The exact methodological principles and systematic rules for a linkage between philosophical theories and neuroscientific hypothesis, however, remain to be clarified. The present contribution focuses on these principles, as well as on the relation between ontology and epistemology and the characterization of hypothesis in neurophilosophy. Principles of transdisciplinary methodology include the ‘principle of asymmetry’, the ‘principle of bi-directionality’ and the ‘principle of transdisciplinary circularity’. The ‘principle of asymmetry’ points to an asymmetric relationship between logical and natural conditions. The ‘principle of bi-directionality’ claims for the necessity of bi-directional linkage between natural and logical conditions. The ‘principle of transdisciplinary circularity’ describes systematic rules for mutual comparison and cross-conditional exchange between philosophical theory and neuroscientific hypotheses. The relation between ontology and epistemology no longer is determined by ontological presuppositions i.e. “ontological primacy”. Instead, there is correspondence between different ‘epistemological capacities’ and different kinds of ontology which consecutively results in “epistemic primacy” and “ontological pluralism”. The present contribution concludes by rejecting some so-called ‘standard-arguments’ including the ‘argument of circularity’, the ‘argument of categorical fallacy’, the ‘argument of validity’ and the ‘argument of necessity’.",
keywords = "Epistemology, Neurophilosophical hypothesis, Neurophilosophy, Ontology, Principles, Standard-arguments",
author = "Georg Northoff",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/B:JGPS.0000035153.89143.4c",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "91--127",
journal = "Journal for General Philosophy of Science - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie",
issn = "0044-2216",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is neurophilosophy? A methodological account

AU - Northoff, Georg

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - The term “neurophilosophy” is often used either implicitly or explicitly for characterizing the investigation of philosophical theories in relation to neuroscientific hypotheses. The exact methodological principles and systematic rules for a linkage between philosophical theories and neuroscientific hypothesis, however, remain to be clarified. The present contribution focuses on these principles, as well as on the relation between ontology and epistemology and the characterization of hypothesis in neurophilosophy. Principles of transdisciplinary methodology include the ‘principle of asymmetry’, the ‘principle of bi-directionality’ and the ‘principle of transdisciplinary circularity’. The ‘principle of asymmetry’ points to an asymmetric relationship between logical and natural conditions. The ‘principle of bi-directionality’ claims for the necessity of bi-directional linkage between natural and logical conditions. The ‘principle of transdisciplinary circularity’ describes systematic rules for mutual comparison and cross-conditional exchange between philosophical theory and neuroscientific hypotheses. The relation between ontology and epistemology no longer is determined by ontological presuppositions i.e. “ontological primacy”. Instead, there is correspondence between different ‘epistemological capacities’ and different kinds of ontology which consecutively results in “epistemic primacy” and “ontological pluralism”. The present contribution concludes by rejecting some so-called ‘standard-arguments’ including the ‘argument of circularity’, the ‘argument of categorical fallacy’, the ‘argument of validity’ and the ‘argument of necessity’.

AB - The term “neurophilosophy” is often used either implicitly or explicitly for characterizing the investigation of philosophical theories in relation to neuroscientific hypotheses. The exact methodological principles and systematic rules for a linkage between philosophical theories and neuroscientific hypothesis, however, remain to be clarified. The present contribution focuses on these principles, as well as on the relation between ontology and epistemology and the characterization of hypothesis in neurophilosophy. Principles of transdisciplinary methodology include the ‘principle of asymmetry’, the ‘principle of bi-directionality’ and the ‘principle of transdisciplinary circularity’. The ‘principle of asymmetry’ points to an asymmetric relationship between logical and natural conditions. The ‘principle of bi-directionality’ claims for the necessity of bi-directional linkage between natural and logical conditions. The ‘principle of transdisciplinary circularity’ describes systematic rules for mutual comparison and cross-conditional exchange between philosophical theory and neuroscientific hypotheses. The relation between ontology and epistemology no longer is determined by ontological presuppositions i.e. “ontological primacy”. Instead, there is correspondence between different ‘epistemological capacities’ and different kinds of ontology which consecutively results in “epistemic primacy” and “ontological pluralism”. The present contribution concludes by rejecting some so-called ‘standard-arguments’ including the ‘argument of circularity’, the ‘argument of categorical fallacy’, the ‘argument of validity’ and the ‘argument of necessity’.

KW - Epistemology

KW - Neurophilosophical hypothesis

KW - Neurophilosophy

KW - Ontology

KW - Principles

KW - Standard-arguments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002252573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002252573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/B:JGPS.0000035153.89143.4c

DO - 10.1023/B:JGPS.0000035153.89143.4c

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85002252573

VL - 35

SP - 91

EP - 127

JO - Journal for General Philosophy of Science - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie

JF - Journal for General Philosophy of Science - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie

SN - 0044-2216

IS - 1

ER -