Walking against or with traffic? Evaluating pedestrian fatalities and head injuries in Taiwan

Chih Wei Pai, Ping Ling Chen, Shiao Tzu Ma, Shan Hong Wu, Václav Linkov, Hon Ping Ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allowing contraflow cycling on one-way streets has been reported to reduce crash risks in Belgium and the United Kingdom. Similarly, walking against traffic on roadways without sidewalks substantially improves pedestrian safety. This study examined fatalities and head injuries sustained by pedestrians in against-traffic and with-traffic crashes. METHODS: Using police-reported crash data in Taiwan between 2011 and 2016, fatalities and head injuries were compared for pedestrians involved in against-traffic and with-traffic crashes. RESULTS: Of the 14,382 pedestrians involved in crashes, 10,749 and 3633 pedestrians in with-traffic and against-traffic crashes, respectively, were reported. Compared with pedestrians involved in against-traffic crashes, those in with-traffic crashes were more likely to sustain fatalities and head injuries. Results of logistic regression models revealed several influential factors on pedestrian fatalities and head injuries, including elderly pedestrians, male drivers, intoxicated drivers, rural roadways, unlit streets in darkness, limited sight distance, adverse weather conditions, midnight hours, and a heavy vehicle as the crash partner. CONCLUSIONS: Pedestrians in with-traffic crashes were more likely to sustain fatalities and head injuries compared with those in against-traffic crashes. Furthermore, the negative effect of walking with traffic on injuries was more pronounced in reduced-visibility conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 10 2019

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Craniocerebral Trauma
Walking
Logistic Models
Pedestrians
Darkness
Belgium
Weather
Police
Safety
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Fatalities
  • Head injuries
  • Pedestrian crash
  • Walking against traffic
  • Walking with traffic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Walking against or with traffic? Evaluating pedestrian fatalities and head injuries in Taiwan. / Pai, Chih Wei; Chen, Ping Ling; Ma, Shiao Tzu; Wu, Shan Hong; Linkov, Václav; Ma, Hon Ping.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 1, 10.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c8102acac3ce44e7a58ad16c1875dca4,
title = "Walking against or with traffic? Evaluating pedestrian fatalities and head injuries in Taiwan",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Allowing contraflow cycling on one-way streets has been reported to reduce crash risks in Belgium and the United Kingdom. Similarly, walking against traffic on roadways without sidewalks substantially improves pedestrian safety. This study examined fatalities and head injuries sustained by pedestrians in against-traffic and with-traffic crashes. METHODS: Using police-reported crash data in Taiwan between 2011 and 2016, fatalities and head injuries were compared for pedestrians involved in against-traffic and with-traffic crashes. RESULTS: Of the 14,382 pedestrians involved in crashes, 10,749 and 3633 pedestrians in with-traffic and against-traffic crashes, respectively, were reported. Compared with pedestrians involved in against-traffic crashes, those in with-traffic crashes were more likely to sustain fatalities and head injuries. Results of logistic regression models revealed several influential factors on pedestrian fatalities and head injuries, including elderly pedestrians, male drivers, intoxicated drivers, rural roadways, unlit streets in darkness, limited sight distance, adverse weather conditions, midnight hours, and a heavy vehicle as the crash partner. CONCLUSIONS: Pedestrians in with-traffic crashes were more likely to sustain fatalities and head injuries compared with those in against-traffic crashes. Furthermore, the negative effect of walking with traffic on injuries was more pronounced in reduced-visibility conditions.",
keywords = "Fatalities, Head injuries, Pedestrian crash, Walking against traffic, Walking with traffic",
author = "Pai, {Chih Wei} and Chen, {Ping Ling} and Ma, {Shiao Tzu} and Wu, {Shan Hong} and V{\'a}clav Linkov and Ma, {Hon Ping}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-019-7588-1",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Walking against or with traffic? Evaluating pedestrian fatalities and head injuries in Taiwan

AU - Pai, Chih Wei

AU - Chen, Ping Ling

AU - Ma, Shiao Tzu

AU - Wu, Shan Hong

AU - Linkov, Václav

AU - Ma, Hon Ping

PY - 2019/10/10

Y1 - 2019/10/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Allowing contraflow cycling on one-way streets has been reported to reduce crash risks in Belgium and the United Kingdom. Similarly, walking against traffic on roadways without sidewalks substantially improves pedestrian safety. This study examined fatalities and head injuries sustained by pedestrians in against-traffic and with-traffic crashes. METHODS: Using police-reported crash data in Taiwan between 2011 and 2016, fatalities and head injuries were compared for pedestrians involved in against-traffic and with-traffic crashes. RESULTS: Of the 14,382 pedestrians involved in crashes, 10,749 and 3633 pedestrians in with-traffic and against-traffic crashes, respectively, were reported. Compared with pedestrians involved in against-traffic crashes, those in with-traffic crashes were more likely to sustain fatalities and head injuries. Results of logistic regression models revealed several influential factors on pedestrian fatalities and head injuries, including elderly pedestrians, male drivers, intoxicated drivers, rural roadways, unlit streets in darkness, limited sight distance, adverse weather conditions, midnight hours, and a heavy vehicle as the crash partner. CONCLUSIONS: Pedestrians in with-traffic crashes were more likely to sustain fatalities and head injuries compared with those in against-traffic crashes. Furthermore, the negative effect of walking with traffic on injuries was more pronounced in reduced-visibility conditions.

AB - BACKGROUND: Allowing contraflow cycling on one-way streets has been reported to reduce crash risks in Belgium and the United Kingdom. Similarly, walking against traffic on roadways without sidewalks substantially improves pedestrian safety. This study examined fatalities and head injuries sustained by pedestrians in against-traffic and with-traffic crashes. METHODS: Using police-reported crash data in Taiwan between 2011 and 2016, fatalities and head injuries were compared for pedestrians involved in against-traffic and with-traffic crashes. RESULTS: Of the 14,382 pedestrians involved in crashes, 10,749 and 3633 pedestrians in with-traffic and against-traffic crashes, respectively, were reported. Compared with pedestrians involved in against-traffic crashes, those in with-traffic crashes were more likely to sustain fatalities and head injuries. Results of logistic regression models revealed several influential factors on pedestrian fatalities and head injuries, including elderly pedestrians, male drivers, intoxicated drivers, rural roadways, unlit streets in darkness, limited sight distance, adverse weather conditions, midnight hours, and a heavy vehicle as the crash partner. CONCLUSIONS: Pedestrians in with-traffic crashes were more likely to sustain fatalities and head injuries compared with those in against-traffic crashes. Furthermore, the negative effect of walking with traffic on injuries was more pronounced in reduced-visibility conditions.

KW - Fatalities

KW - Head injuries

KW - Pedestrian crash

KW - Walking against traffic

KW - Walking with traffic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073121291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073121291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-019-7588-1

DO - 10.1186/s12889-019-7588-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 31601217

AN - SCOPUS:85073121291

VL - 19

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

ER -