Volume-dependent overestimation of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma volume by the abc/2 formula

Chih Wei Wang, Chun Jung Juan, Yi Jui Liu, Hsian He Hsu, Hua Shan Liu, Cheng Yu Chen, Chun Jen Hsueh, Chung Ping Lo, Hung Wen Kao, Guo Shu Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although the ABC/2 formula has been widely used to estimate the volume of intracerebral hematoma (ICH), the formula tends to overestimate hematoma volume. The volume-related imprecision of the ABC/2 formula has not been documented quantitatively. Purpose: To investigate the volume-dependent overestimation of the ABC/2 formula by comparing it with computer-assisted volumetric analysis (CAVA). Material and Methods: Forty patients who had suffered spontaneous ICH and who had undergone non-enhanced brain computed tomography scans were enrolled in this study. The ICH volume was estimated based on the ABC/2 formula and also calculated by CAVA. Based on the ICH volume calculated by the CAVA method, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1 consisted of 17 patients with an ICH volume of less than 20 ml; group 2 comprised 13 patients with an ICH volume of 20 to 40 ml; and group 3 was composed of 10 patients with an ICH volume larger than 40 ml. Results: The mean estimated hematoma volume was 43.6 ml when using the ABC/2 formula, compared with 33.8 ml when using the CAVA method. The mean estimated difference was 1.3 ml, 4.4 ml, and 31.4 ml for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, corresponding to an estimation error of 9.9%, 16.7%, and 37.1% by the ABC/2 formula (P0.05). Conclusion: The ABC/2 formula significantly overestimates the volume of ICH. A positive association between the estimation error and the volume of ICH is demonstrated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)306-311
Number of pages6
JournalActa Radiologica
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hematoma
Tomography
Brain

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Computer-assisted volumetric analysis
  • Intracerebral hematoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Volume-dependent overestimation of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma volume by the abc/2 formula. / Wang, Chih Wei; Juan, Chun Jung; Liu, Yi Jui; Hsu, Hsian He; Liu, Hua Shan; Chen, Cheng Yu; Hsueh, Chun Jen; Lo, Chung Ping; Kao, Hung Wen; Huang, Guo Shu.

In: Acta Radiologica, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2009, p. 306-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, CW, Juan, CJ, Liu, YJ, Hsu, HH, Liu, HS, Chen, CY, Hsueh, CJ, Lo, CP, Kao, HW & Huang, GS 2009, 'Volume-dependent overestimation of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma volume by the abc/2 formula', Acta Radiologica, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 306-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850802647039
Wang, Chih Wei ; Juan, Chun Jung ; Liu, Yi Jui ; Hsu, Hsian He ; Liu, Hua Shan ; Chen, Cheng Yu ; Hsueh, Chun Jen ; Lo, Chung Ping ; Kao, Hung Wen ; Huang, Guo Shu. / Volume-dependent overestimation of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma volume by the abc/2 formula. In: Acta Radiologica. 2009 ; Vol. 50, No. 3. pp. 306-311.
@article{2142ef8553a24319ab466ac2bb54ee6a,
title = "Volume-dependent overestimation of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma volume by the abc/2 formula",
abstract = "Background: Although the ABC/2 formula has been widely used to estimate the volume of intracerebral hematoma (ICH), the formula tends to overestimate hematoma volume. The volume-related imprecision of the ABC/2 formula has not been documented quantitatively. Purpose: To investigate the volume-dependent overestimation of the ABC/2 formula by comparing it with computer-assisted volumetric analysis (CAVA). Material and Methods: Forty patients who had suffered spontaneous ICH and who had undergone non-enhanced brain computed tomography scans were enrolled in this study. The ICH volume was estimated based on the ABC/2 formula and also calculated by CAVA. Based on the ICH volume calculated by the CAVA method, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1 consisted of 17 patients with an ICH volume of less than 20 ml; group 2 comprised 13 patients with an ICH volume of 20 to 40 ml; and group 3 was composed of 10 patients with an ICH volume larger than 40 ml. Results: The mean estimated hematoma volume was 43.6 ml when using the ABC/2 formula, compared with 33.8 ml when using the CAVA method. The mean estimated difference was 1.3 ml, 4.4 ml, and 31.4 ml for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, corresponding to an estimation error of 9.9{\%}, 16.7{\%}, and 37.1{\%} by the ABC/2 formula (P0.05). Conclusion: The ABC/2 formula significantly overestimates the volume of ICH. A positive association between the estimation error and the volume of ICH is demonstrated.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, Computer-assisted volumetric analysis, Intracerebral hematoma",
author = "Wang, {Chih Wei} and Juan, {Chun Jung} and Liu, {Yi Jui} and Hsu, {Hsian He} and Liu, {Hua Shan} and Chen, {Cheng Yu} and Hsueh, {Chun Jen} and Lo, {Chung Ping} and Kao, {Hung Wen} and Huang, {Guo Shu}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/02841850802647039",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "306--311",
journal = "Acta Radiologica",
issn = "0284-1851",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Volume-dependent overestimation of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma volume by the abc/2 formula

AU - Wang, Chih Wei

AU - Juan, Chun Jung

AU - Liu, Yi Jui

AU - Hsu, Hsian He

AU - Liu, Hua Shan

AU - Chen, Cheng Yu

AU - Hsueh, Chun Jen

AU - Lo, Chung Ping

AU - Kao, Hung Wen

AU - Huang, Guo Shu

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background: Although the ABC/2 formula has been widely used to estimate the volume of intracerebral hematoma (ICH), the formula tends to overestimate hematoma volume. The volume-related imprecision of the ABC/2 formula has not been documented quantitatively. Purpose: To investigate the volume-dependent overestimation of the ABC/2 formula by comparing it with computer-assisted volumetric analysis (CAVA). Material and Methods: Forty patients who had suffered spontaneous ICH and who had undergone non-enhanced brain computed tomography scans were enrolled in this study. The ICH volume was estimated based on the ABC/2 formula and also calculated by CAVA. Based on the ICH volume calculated by the CAVA method, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1 consisted of 17 patients with an ICH volume of less than 20 ml; group 2 comprised 13 patients with an ICH volume of 20 to 40 ml; and group 3 was composed of 10 patients with an ICH volume larger than 40 ml. Results: The mean estimated hematoma volume was 43.6 ml when using the ABC/2 formula, compared with 33.8 ml when using the CAVA method. The mean estimated difference was 1.3 ml, 4.4 ml, and 31.4 ml for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, corresponding to an estimation error of 9.9%, 16.7%, and 37.1% by the ABC/2 formula (P0.05). Conclusion: The ABC/2 formula significantly overestimates the volume of ICH. A positive association between the estimation error and the volume of ICH is demonstrated.

AB - Background: Although the ABC/2 formula has been widely used to estimate the volume of intracerebral hematoma (ICH), the formula tends to overestimate hematoma volume. The volume-related imprecision of the ABC/2 formula has not been documented quantitatively. Purpose: To investigate the volume-dependent overestimation of the ABC/2 formula by comparing it with computer-assisted volumetric analysis (CAVA). Material and Methods: Forty patients who had suffered spontaneous ICH and who had undergone non-enhanced brain computed tomography scans were enrolled in this study. The ICH volume was estimated based on the ABC/2 formula and also calculated by CAVA. Based on the ICH volume calculated by the CAVA method, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1 consisted of 17 patients with an ICH volume of less than 20 ml; group 2 comprised 13 patients with an ICH volume of 20 to 40 ml; and group 3 was composed of 10 patients with an ICH volume larger than 40 ml. Results: The mean estimated hematoma volume was 43.6 ml when using the ABC/2 formula, compared with 33.8 ml when using the CAVA method. The mean estimated difference was 1.3 ml, 4.4 ml, and 31.4 ml for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, corresponding to an estimation error of 9.9%, 16.7%, and 37.1% by the ABC/2 formula (P0.05). Conclusion: The ABC/2 formula significantly overestimates the volume of ICH. A positive association between the estimation error and the volume of ICH is demonstrated.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Computer-assisted volumetric analysis

KW - Intracerebral hematoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64149116735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64149116735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02841850802647039

DO - 10.1080/02841850802647039

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 306

EP - 311

JO - Acta Radiologica

JF - Acta Radiologica

SN - 0284-1851

IS - 3

ER -