Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Minimal Access Spinal Surgery Compared in Anterior Thoracic or Thoracolumbar Junctional Spinal Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study and Review of the Literature

Ching Yu Lee, Meng Huang Wu, Yen Yao Li, Chin Chang Cheng, Chien Yin Lee, Tsung-Jen Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There are no published reports that compare the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and minimal access spinal surgery (MASS) in anterior spinal reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a single center and systematically reviewed the literature to compare the efficacy and safety of VATS and MASS in anterior thoracic (T) and thoracolumbar junctional (TLJ) spinal reconstruction. From 1995 to 2012, there were 111 VATS patients and 76 MASS patients treated at our hospital. VATS patients had significantly (p < 0.001) longer operating times and significantly (p < 0.022) higher thoracotomy conversion rates. We reviewed 6 VATS articles and 10 MASS articles, in which there were 625 VATS patients and 399 MASS patients. We recorded clinical complications and a thoracotomy conversion rate from our cases and the selected articles. The incidence of approach-related complications was significantly (p = 0.021) higher in VATS patients. The conversion rate was 2% in VATS patients and 0% in MASS patients (p = 0.001). In conclusion, MASS is associated with reduction in operating time, approach-related complications, and the thoracotomy conversion rate.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6808507
JournalBioMed Research International
Volume2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Surgery
Case-Control Studies
Thorax
Thoracotomy
Safety
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

@article{46cd8f10f0b84875a986e5c50da8a78a,
title = "Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Minimal Access Spinal Surgery Compared in Anterior Thoracic or Thoracolumbar Junctional Spinal Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study and Review of the Literature",
abstract = "There are no published reports that compare the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and minimal access spinal surgery (MASS) in anterior spinal reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a single center and systematically reviewed the literature to compare the efficacy and safety of VATS and MASS in anterior thoracic (T) and thoracolumbar junctional (TLJ) spinal reconstruction. From 1995 to 2012, there were 111 VATS patients and 76 MASS patients treated at our hospital. VATS patients had significantly (p < 0.001) longer operating times and significantly (p < 0.022) higher thoracotomy conversion rates. We reviewed 6 VATS articles and 10 MASS articles, in which there were 625 VATS patients and 399 MASS patients. We recorded clinical complications and a thoracotomy conversion rate from our cases and the selected articles. The incidence of approach-related complications was significantly (p = 0.021) higher in VATS patients. The conversion rate was 2{\%} in VATS patients and 0{\%} in MASS patients (p = 0.001). In conclusion, MASS is associated with reduction in operating time, approach-related complications, and the thoracotomy conversion rate.",
author = "Lee, {Ching Yu} and Wu, {Meng Huang} and Li, {Yen Yao} and Cheng, {Chin Chang} and Lee, {Chien Yin} and Tsung-Jen Huang",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1155/2016/6808507",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "BioMed Research International",
issn = "2314-6133",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Minimal Access Spinal Surgery Compared in Anterior Thoracic or Thoracolumbar Junctional Spinal Reconstruction

T2 - A Case-Control Study and Review of the Literature

AU - Lee, Ching Yu

AU - Wu, Meng Huang

AU - Li, Yen Yao

AU - Cheng, Chin Chang

AU - Lee, Chien Yin

AU - Huang, Tsung-Jen

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - There are no published reports that compare the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and minimal access spinal surgery (MASS) in anterior spinal reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a single center and systematically reviewed the literature to compare the efficacy and safety of VATS and MASS in anterior thoracic (T) and thoracolumbar junctional (TLJ) spinal reconstruction. From 1995 to 2012, there were 111 VATS patients and 76 MASS patients treated at our hospital. VATS patients had significantly (p < 0.001) longer operating times and significantly (p < 0.022) higher thoracotomy conversion rates. We reviewed 6 VATS articles and 10 MASS articles, in which there were 625 VATS patients and 399 MASS patients. We recorded clinical complications and a thoracotomy conversion rate from our cases and the selected articles. The incidence of approach-related complications was significantly (p = 0.021) higher in VATS patients. The conversion rate was 2% in VATS patients and 0% in MASS patients (p = 0.001). In conclusion, MASS is associated with reduction in operating time, approach-related complications, and the thoracotomy conversion rate.

AB - There are no published reports that compare the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and minimal access spinal surgery (MASS) in anterior spinal reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a single center and systematically reviewed the literature to compare the efficacy and safety of VATS and MASS in anterior thoracic (T) and thoracolumbar junctional (TLJ) spinal reconstruction. From 1995 to 2012, there were 111 VATS patients and 76 MASS patients treated at our hospital. VATS patients had significantly (p < 0.001) longer operating times and significantly (p < 0.022) higher thoracotomy conversion rates. We reviewed 6 VATS articles and 10 MASS articles, in which there were 625 VATS patients and 399 MASS patients. We recorded clinical complications and a thoracotomy conversion rate from our cases and the selected articles. The incidence of approach-related complications was significantly (p = 0.021) higher in VATS patients. The conversion rate was 2% in VATS patients and 0% in MASS patients (p = 0.001). In conclusion, MASS is associated with reduction in operating time, approach-related complications, and the thoracotomy conversion rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008715971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008715971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2016/6808507

DO - 10.1155/2016/6808507

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28101511

AN - SCOPUS:85008715971

VL - 2016

JO - BioMed Research International

JF - BioMed Research International

SN - 2314-6133

M1 - 6808507

ER -