Venoarterial extracorporeal life support in post-traumatic shock and cardiac arrest: Lessons learned

Yuan His Tseng, Tzu I. Wu, Yuan Chang Liu, Pyng Jing Lin, Meng Yu Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is an effective support of acute hemodynamic collapse caused by miscellaneous diseases. However, using VA-ECLS for post-traumatic shock is controversial and may induce a disastrous hemorrhage. To investigate the feasibility of using VA-ECLS to treat post-traumatic shock or cardiac arrest (CA), a single-center experience of VA-ECLS in traumatology was reported.Materials and methods: This retrospective study included nine patients [median age: 37 years, interquartile range (IQR): 26.5-46] with post-traumatic shock/CA who were treated with VA-ECLS in a single institution between November 2003 and October 2012. The causes of trauma were high-voltage electrocution (n = 1), penetrating chest trauma (n = 1), and blunt chest or poly-trauma (n = 7). Medians of the injury severity score and the maximal chest abbreviated injury scale were 34 (IQR: 15.5-41) and 4 (IQR: 3-4), respectively. All patients received peripheral VA-ECLS without heparin infusion for at least 24 hours.Results: The median time from arrival at our emergency department (ED) to VA-ECLS was 6 h (IQR: 4-47.5). The median duration of VA-ECLS was 91 h (IQR: 43-187) with a duration <24 h in 2 patients. Among the 9 patients, 5 received VA-ECLS to treat the post-traumatic shock/CA presenting during (n = 2) or following (n = 3) damage-control surgeries for initial trauma, and another 4 patients were supported for non-surgical complications associated with initial trauma. VA-ECLS was terminated in 2 non-survivors owing to uncontrolled hemothorax or retroperitoneal hemorrhage. Three patients survived to hospital discharge. All of them received damage-control surgeries for initial trauma and experienced a complicated hospitalization after weaning off VA-ECLS.Conclusion: Using VA-ECLS to treat post-traumatic shock/CA is challenging and requires multidisciplinary expertise.

Original languageEnglish
Article number12
JournalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 7 2014

Fingerprint

Traumatic Shock
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Heart Arrest
Wounds and Injuries
Thorax
Abbreviated Injury Scale
Hemorrhage
Hemothorax
Traumatology
Thoracic Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Weaning
Heparin
Hospital Emergency Service

Keywords

  • Blunt chest trauma
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Extracorporeal life support
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
  • Traumatic shock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Venoarterial extracorporeal life support in post-traumatic shock and cardiac arrest : Lessons learned. / Tseng, Yuan His; Wu, Tzu I.; Liu, Yuan Chang; Lin, Pyng Jing; Wu, Meng Yu.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 1, 12, 07.02.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a0d7836f8104defafa5313aa697b566,
title = "Venoarterial extracorporeal life support in post-traumatic shock and cardiac arrest: Lessons learned",
abstract = "Objectives: Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is an effective support of acute hemodynamic collapse caused by miscellaneous diseases. However, using VA-ECLS for post-traumatic shock is controversial and may induce a disastrous hemorrhage. To investigate the feasibility of using VA-ECLS to treat post-traumatic shock or cardiac arrest (CA), a single-center experience of VA-ECLS in traumatology was reported.Materials and methods: This retrospective study included nine patients [median age: 37 years, interquartile range (IQR): 26.5-46] with post-traumatic shock/CA who were treated with VA-ECLS in a single institution between November 2003 and October 2012. The causes of trauma were high-voltage electrocution (n = 1), penetrating chest trauma (n = 1), and blunt chest or poly-trauma (n = 7). Medians of the injury severity score and the maximal chest abbreviated injury scale were 34 (IQR: 15.5-41) and 4 (IQR: 3-4), respectively. All patients received peripheral VA-ECLS without heparin infusion for at least 24 hours.Results: The median time from arrival at our emergency department (ED) to VA-ECLS was 6 h (IQR: 4-47.5). The median duration of VA-ECLS was 91 h (IQR: 43-187) with a duration <24 h in 2 patients. Among the 9 patients, 5 received VA-ECLS to treat the post-traumatic shock/CA presenting during (n = 2) or following (n = 3) damage-control surgeries for initial trauma, and another 4 patients were supported for non-surgical complications associated with initial trauma. VA-ECLS was terminated in 2 non-survivors owing to uncontrolled hemothorax or retroperitoneal hemorrhage. Three patients survived to hospital discharge. All of them received damage-control surgeries for initial trauma and experienced a complicated hospitalization after weaning off VA-ECLS.Conclusion: Using VA-ECLS to treat post-traumatic shock/CA is challenging and requires multidisciplinary expertise.",
keywords = "Blunt chest trauma, Cardiac arrest, Extracorporeal life support, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Traumatic shock",
author = "Tseng, {Yuan His} and Wu, {Tzu I.} and Liu, {Yuan Chang} and Lin, {Pyng Jing} and Wu, {Meng Yu}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1186/1757-7241-22-12",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1757-7241",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Venoarterial extracorporeal life support in post-traumatic shock and cardiac arrest

T2 - Lessons learned

AU - Tseng, Yuan His

AU - Wu, Tzu I.

AU - Liu, Yuan Chang

AU - Lin, Pyng Jing

AU - Wu, Meng Yu

PY - 2014/2/7

Y1 - 2014/2/7

N2 - Objectives: Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is an effective support of acute hemodynamic collapse caused by miscellaneous diseases. However, using VA-ECLS for post-traumatic shock is controversial and may induce a disastrous hemorrhage. To investigate the feasibility of using VA-ECLS to treat post-traumatic shock or cardiac arrest (CA), a single-center experience of VA-ECLS in traumatology was reported.Materials and methods: This retrospective study included nine patients [median age: 37 years, interquartile range (IQR): 26.5-46] with post-traumatic shock/CA who were treated with VA-ECLS in a single institution between November 2003 and October 2012. The causes of trauma were high-voltage electrocution (n = 1), penetrating chest trauma (n = 1), and blunt chest or poly-trauma (n = 7). Medians of the injury severity score and the maximal chest abbreviated injury scale were 34 (IQR: 15.5-41) and 4 (IQR: 3-4), respectively. All patients received peripheral VA-ECLS without heparin infusion for at least 24 hours.Results: The median time from arrival at our emergency department (ED) to VA-ECLS was 6 h (IQR: 4-47.5). The median duration of VA-ECLS was 91 h (IQR: 43-187) with a duration <24 h in 2 patients. Among the 9 patients, 5 received VA-ECLS to treat the post-traumatic shock/CA presenting during (n = 2) or following (n = 3) damage-control surgeries for initial trauma, and another 4 patients were supported for non-surgical complications associated with initial trauma. VA-ECLS was terminated in 2 non-survivors owing to uncontrolled hemothorax or retroperitoneal hemorrhage. Three patients survived to hospital discharge. All of them received damage-control surgeries for initial trauma and experienced a complicated hospitalization after weaning off VA-ECLS.Conclusion: Using VA-ECLS to treat post-traumatic shock/CA is challenging and requires multidisciplinary expertise.

AB - Objectives: Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is an effective support of acute hemodynamic collapse caused by miscellaneous diseases. However, using VA-ECLS for post-traumatic shock is controversial and may induce a disastrous hemorrhage. To investigate the feasibility of using VA-ECLS to treat post-traumatic shock or cardiac arrest (CA), a single-center experience of VA-ECLS in traumatology was reported.Materials and methods: This retrospective study included nine patients [median age: 37 years, interquartile range (IQR): 26.5-46] with post-traumatic shock/CA who were treated with VA-ECLS in a single institution between November 2003 and October 2012. The causes of trauma were high-voltage electrocution (n = 1), penetrating chest trauma (n = 1), and blunt chest or poly-trauma (n = 7). Medians of the injury severity score and the maximal chest abbreviated injury scale were 34 (IQR: 15.5-41) and 4 (IQR: 3-4), respectively. All patients received peripheral VA-ECLS without heparin infusion for at least 24 hours.Results: The median time from arrival at our emergency department (ED) to VA-ECLS was 6 h (IQR: 4-47.5). The median duration of VA-ECLS was 91 h (IQR: 43-187) with a duration <24 h in 2 patients. Among the 9 patients, 5 received VA-ECLS to treat the post-traumatic shock/CA presenting during (n = 2) or following (n = 3) damage-control surgeries for initial trauma, and another 4 patients were supported for non-surgical complications associated with initial trauma. VA-ECLS was terminated in 2 non-survivors owing to uncontrolled hemothorax or retroperitoneal hemorrhage. Three patients survived to hospital discharge. All of them received damage-control surgeries for initial trauma and experienced a complicated hospitalization after weaning off VA-ECLS.Conclusion: Using VA-ECLS to treat post-traumatic shock/CA is challenging and requires multidisciplinary expertise.

KW - Blunt chest trauma

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Extracorporeal life support

KW - Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

KW - Traumatic shock

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893642621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893642621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1757-7241-22-12

DO - 10.1186/1757-7241-22-12

M3 - Article

C2 - 24502644

AN - SCOPUS:84893642621

VL - 22

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

SN - 1757-7241

IS - 1

M1 - 12

ER -