Utility of patient-activated cardiac event recorders in the detection of cardiac arrhythmias

Chih Cheng Wu, Ming Hsiung Hsieh, Ching Tai Tai, Chern En Chiang, Wen Chung Yu, Yung Kuo Lin, Hsuan Ming Tsao, Phillip Yu An Ding, Shih Ann Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patient-activated event recorders are useful for the diagnosis of arrhythmia in patients with palpitation and presyncope. However, the utility of event recorders in patients suspected of arrhythmia but presenting with other symptoms is not clear. Furthermore, the factors influencing their utility have not been evaluated. Methods: Event recorder reports of six hundred and sixty consecutive patients referred due to clinical suspicion of cardiac arrhythmia were reviewed. We divided symptoms into four groups: palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea. We calculated the diagnostic yield according to patients' symptoms reported on the record, and analyzed the factors affecting the utility of event recorders. Results: The overall diagnostic yield was 64%, and those of palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea were 66%, 57%, 51% and 60%, respectively. The most common five findings in our patients were sinus rhythm (36%), sinus tachycardia (30%), atrial premature complex (14%), ventricular premature complex (12%), and atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (7%). The recording duration (8 ± 4 days) was short in the present study, but the overall diagnostic yield was similar to those of previous ones. Women had lower diagnostic yields than men, especially in atrial flutter-fibrillation. The diagnostie diagnostic yield was not influenced by age, ordered doctors, or history of cardiovascular disease. Conclusions: Patient-activated event recorders provided a good diagnostic yield in patients with different presentations of cardiac arrhythmia, and women had lower diagnostic yield in atrial flutter-fibrillation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-120
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

Fingerprint

Cardiac Arrhythmias
Atrial Flutter
Syncope
Atrial Fibrillation
Dyspnea
Thorax
Atrial Premature Complexes
Sinus Tachycardia
Ventricular Premature Complexes
Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

  • Arrhythmia
  • Event recorder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Utility of patient-activated cardiac event recorders in the detection of cardiac arrhythmias. / Wu, Chih Cheng; Hsieh, Ming Hsiung; Tai, Ching Tai; Chiang, Chern En; Yu, Wen Chung; Lin, Yung Kuo; Tsao, Hsuan Ming; Ding, Phillip Yu An; Chen, Shih Ann.

In: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 04.2003, p. 117-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, Chih Cheng ; Hsieh, Ming Hsiung ; Tai, Ching Tai ; Chiang, Chern En ; Yu, Wen Chung ; Lin, Yung Kuo ; Tsao, Hsuan Ming ; Ding, Phillip Yu An ; Chen, Shih Ann. / Utility of patient-activated cardiac event recorders in the detection of cardiac arrhythmias. In: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 2003 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 117-120.
@article{0700985e99574c4bb295c94082224cb1,
title = "Utility of patient-activated cardiac event recorders in the detection of cardiac arrhythmias",
abstract = "Background: Patient-activated event recorders are useful for the diagnosis of arrhythmia in patients with palpitation and presyncope. However, the utility of event recorders in patients suspected of arrhythmia but presenting with other symptoms is not clear. Furthermore, the factors influencing their utility have not been evaluated. Methods: Event recorder reports of six hundred and sixty consecutive patients referred due to clinical suspicion of cardiac arrhythmia were reviewed. We divided symptoms into four groups: palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea. We calculated the diagnostic yield according to patients' symptoms reported on the record, and analyzed the factors affecting the utility of event recorders. Results: The overall diagnostic yield was 64{\%}, and those of palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea were 66{\%}, 57{\%}, 51{\%} and 60{\%}, respectively. The most common five findings in our patients were sinus rhythm (36{\%}), sinus tachycardia (30{\%}), atrial premature complex (14{\%}), ventricular premature complex (12{\%}), and atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (7{\%}). The recording duration (8 ± 4 days) was short in the present study, but the overall diagnostic yield was similar to those of previous ones. Women had lower diagnostic yields than men, especially in atrial flutter-fibrillation. The diagnostie diagnostic yield was not influenced by age, ordered doctors, or history of cardiovascular disease. Conclusions: Patient-activated event recorders provided a good diagnostic yield in patients with different presentations of cardiac arrhythmia, and women had lower diagnostic yield in atrial flutter-fibrillation.",
keywords = "Arrhythmia, Event recorder",
author = "Wu, {Chih Cheng} and Hsieh, {Ming Hsiung} and Tai, {Ching Tai} and Chiang, {Chern En} and Yu, {Wen Chung} and Lin, {Yung Kuo} and Tsao, {Hsuan Ming} and Ding, {Phillip Yu An} and Chen, {Shih Ann}",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1023/A:1023604816368",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "117--120",
journal = "Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology",
issn = "1383-875X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of patient-activated cardiac event recorders in the detection of cardiac arrhythmias

AU - Wu, Chih Cheng

AU - Hsieh, Ming Hsiung

AU - Tai, Ching Tai

AU - Chiang, Chern En

AU - Yu, Wen Chung

AU - Lin, Yung Kuo

AU - Tsao, Hsuan Ming

AU - Ding, Phillip Yu An

AU - Chen, Shih Ann

PY - 2003/4

Y1 - 2003/4

N2 - Background: Patient-activated event recorders are useful for the diagnosis of arrhythmia in patients with palpitation and presyncope. However, the utility of event recorders in patients suspected of arrhythmia but presenting with other symptoms is not clear. Furthermore, the factors influencing their utility have not been evaluated. Methods: Event recorder reports of six hundred and sixty consecutive patients referred due to clinical suspicion of cardiac arrhythmia were reviewed. We divided symptoms into four groups: palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea. We calculated the diagnostic yield according to patients' symptoms reported on the record, and analyzed the factors affecting the utility of event recorders. Results: The overall diagnostic yield was 64%, and those of palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea were 66%, 57%, 51% and 60%, respectively. The most common five findings in our patients were sinus rhythm (36%), sinus tachycardia (30%), atrial premature complex (14%), ventricular premature complex (12%), and atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (7%). The recording duration (8 ± 4 days) was short in the present study, but the overall diagnostic yield was similar to those of previous ones. Women had lower diagnostic yields than men, especially in atrial flutter-fibrillation. The diagnostie diagnostic yield was not influenced by age, ordered doctors, or history of cardiovascular disease. Conclusions: Patient-activated event recorders provided a good diagnostic yield in patients with different presentations of cardiac arrhythmia, and women had lower diagnostic yield in atrial flutter-fibrillation.

AB - Background: Patient-activated event recorders are useful for the diagnosis of arrhythmia in patients with palpitation and presyncope. However, the utility of event recorders in patients suspected of arrhythmia but presenting with other symptoms is not clear. Furthermore, the factors influencing their utility have not been evaluated. Methods: Event recorder reports of six hundred and sixty consecutive patients referred due to clinical suspicion of cardiac arrhythmia were reviewed. We divided symptoms into four groups: palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea. We calculated the diagnostic yield according to patients' symptoms reported on the record, and analyzed the factors affecting the utility of event recorders. Results: The overall diagnostic yield was 64%, and those of palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea were 66%, 57%, 51% and 60%, respectively. The most common five findings in our patients were sinus rhythm (36%), sinus tachycardia (30%), atrial premature complex (14%), ventricular premature complex (12%), and atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (7%). The recording duration (8 ± 4 days) was short in the present study, but the overall diagnostic yield was similar to those of previous ones. Women had lower diagnostic yields than men, especially in atrial flutter-fibrillation. The diagnostie diagnostic yield was not influenced by age, ordered doctors, or history of cardiovascular disease. Conclusions: Patient-activated event recorders provided a good diagnostic yield in patients with different presentations of cardiac arrhythmia, and women had lower diagnostic yield in atrial flutter-fibrillation.

KW - Arrhythmia

KW - Event recorder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038208078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038208078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1023604816368

DO - 10.1023/A:1023604816368

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 117

EP - 120

JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

SN - 1383-875X

IS - 2

ER -