Using vote cards to encourage active participation and to improve critical appraisal skills in evidence-based medicine journal clubs

Ka Wai Tam, Lung Wen Tsai, Chien Chih Wu, Po Li Wei, Chou Fu Wei, Soul Chin Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives Evidence-based medicine (EBM) journal clubs are used by health care practitioners to critique and remain updated on relevant health literature. Vote cards, in three different colours (green/yellow/red), allow participants to express their opinions (agree/doubt/reject) on the quality and possibility of clinical application regarding the article being reviewed. Our aim is to assess the efficacy of using vote cards in EBM journal clubs. Methods Evidence-based medicine journal club is held on a weekly basis in the Department of Surgery in Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. The participants of EBM journal clubs include medical students, resident doctors and primary care faculty members. After the presentation, participants use their vote cards to critically appraise the literature and decide if the rationales could be applied in their own practice. After a 12-week period, we evaluated the effectiveness of the vote cards based on survey findings of the participants. Results The majority of 66 respondents agreed that vote cards can improve the overall quality of EBM journal clubs, may encourage active participation and improve critical appraisal skills. They also rated the vote cards more favourably than traditional hand voting and agree that vote cards should be used in future EBM journal clubs. Conclusion We suggest the regular and routine use of vote cards in EBM journal clubs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)827-831
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Politics
Medical Students
Taiwan
Primary Health Care
Hand
Color
Delivery of Health Care
Health

Keywords

  • active participation
  • critical appraisal skills
  • evidence-based medicine journal clubs
  • vote cards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Using vote cards to encourage active participation and to improve critical appraisal skills in evidence-based medicine journal clubs. / Tam, Ka Wai; Tsai, Lung Wen; Wu, Chien Chih; Wei, Po Li; Wei, Chou Fu; Chen, Soul Chin.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 17, No. 4, 08.2011, p. 827-831.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{726eb485b9874198ad51d7f3a9eb857e,
title = "Using vote cards to encourage active participation and to improve critical appraisal skills in evidence-based medicine journal clubs",
abstract = "Rationale, aims and objectives Evidence-based medicine (EBM) journal clubs are used by health care practitioners to critique and remain updated on relevant health literature. Vote cards, in three different colours (green/yellow/red), allow participants to express their opinions (agree/doubt/reject) on the quality and possibility of clinical application regarding the article being reviewed. Our aim is to assess the efficacy of using vote cards in EBM journal clubs. Methods Evidence-based medicine journal club is held on a weekly basis in the Department of Surgery in Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. The participants of EBM journal clubs include medical students, resident doctors and primary care faculty members. After the presentation, participants use their vote cards to critically appraise the literature and decide if the rationales could be applied in their own practice. After a 12-week period, we evaluated the effectiveness of the vote cards based on survey findings of the participants. Results The majority of 66 respondents agreed that vote cards can improve the overall quality of EBM journal clubs, may encourage active participation and improve critical appraisal skills. They also rated the vote cards more favourably than traditional hand voting and agree that vote cards should be used in future EBM journal clubs. Conclusion We suggest the regular and routine use of vote cards in EBM journal clubs.",
keywords = "active participation, critical appraisal skills, evidence-based medicine journal clubs, vote cards",
author = "Tam, {Ka Wai} and Tsai, {Lung Wen} and Wu, {Chien Chih} and Wei, {Po Li} and Wei, {Chou Fu} and Chen, {Soul Chin}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01711.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "827--831",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using vote cards to encourage active participation and to improve critical appraisal skills in evidence-based medicine journal clubs

AU - Tam, Ka Wai

AU - Tsai, Lung Wen

AU - Wu, Chien Chih

AU - Wei, Po Li

AU - Wei, Chou Fu

AU - Chen, Soul Chin

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Rationale, aims and objectives Evidence-based medicine (EBM) journal clubs are used by health care practitioners to critique and remain updated on relevant health literature. Vote cards, in three different colours (green/yellow/red), allow participants to express their opinions (agree/doubt/reject) on the quality and possibility of clinical application regarding the article being reviewed. Our aim is to assess the efficacy of using vote cards in EBM journal clubs. Methods Evidence-based medicine journal club is held on a weekly basis in the Department of Surgery in Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. The participants of EBM journal clubs include medical students, resident doctors and primary care faculty members. After the presentation, participants use their vote cards to critically appraise the literature and decide if the rationales could be applied in their own practice. After a 12-week period, we evaluated the effectiveness of the vote cards based on survey findings of the participants. Results The majority of 66 respondents agreed that vote cards can improve the overall quality of EBM journal clubs, may encourage active participation and improve critical appraisal skills. They also rated the vote cards more favourably than traditional hand voting and agree that vote cards should be used in future EBM journal clubs. Conclusion We suggest the regular and routine use of vote cards in EBM journal clubs.

AB - Rationale, aims and objectives Evidence-based medicine (EBM) journal clubs are used by health care practitioners to critique and remain updated on relevant health literature. Vote cards, in three different colours (green/yellow/red), allow participants to express their opinions (agree/doubt/reject) on the quality and possibility of clinical application regarding the article being reviewed. Our aim is to assess the efficacy of using vote cards in EBM journal clubs. Methods Evidence-based medicine journal club is held on a weekly basis in the Department of Surgery in Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. The participants of EBM journal clubs include medical students, resident doctors and primary care faculty members. After the presentation, participants use their vote cards to critically appraise the literature and decide if the rationales could be applied in their own practice. After a 12-week period, we evaluated the effectiveness of the vote cards based on survey findings of the participants. Results The majority of 66 respondents agreed that vote cards can improve the overall quality of EBM journal clubs, may encourage active participation and improve critical appraisal skills. They also rated the vote cards more favourably than traditional hand voting and agree that vote cards should be used in future EBM journal clubs. Conclusion We suggest the regular and routine use of vote cards in EBM journal clubs.

KW - active participation

KW - critical appraisal skills

KW - evidence-based medicine journal clubs

KW - vote cards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961031178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961031178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01711.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01711.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21689219

AN - SCOPUS:79961031178

VL - 17

SP - 827

EP - 831

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 4

ER -