Using "exposure prediction rules" for exposure assessment

An example on whole-body vibration in taxi drivers

Jiu Chiuan Chen, Wen Ruey Chang, Tung Sheng Shih, Chiou Jong Chen, Wushou P. Chang, Jack T. Dennerlein, Louise M. Ryan, David C. Christiani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is often difficult and expensive to make direct measurements of an individual's occupational or environmental exposures in large epidemiologic studies. Methods: In this study, we used information collected in validation studies to develop a prediction rule for assessing exposure in a study with no direct measurement. We established a prediction rule through mixed-effect modeling of direct measurement data and information on observable exposure predictors and their interactions. Specifically, we used 383 measures of whole-body vibration from 247 professional taxi drivers and attempted to quantify vibration exposures for individuals in a large study on low back pain. Results: Using the "jackknife method," we found that our prediction rule had an acceptably low relative prediction error of 11% (95% confidence interval-10-12%). Implementing the prediction rule would result in measurement errors independent of low back pain and of all identified and observable predictors of whole-body vibration. We applied the predicted levels to compute each person's daily exposure, and found a strong association between the predicted daily whole-body vibration exposure and prevalence of low back pain. This supported the construct validity of the exposure prediction rule. Conclusions: The predictive and construct validity of our prediction rule suggests that this general statistical approach can be useful in other occupational settings to improve the quality of exposure assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-299
Number of pages7
JournalEpidemiology
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vibration
Low Back Pain
Body Weights and Measures
Validation Studies
Environmental Exposure
Occupational Exposure
Epidemiologic Studies
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Chen, J. C., Chang, W. R., Shih, T. S., Chen, C. J., Chang, W. P., Dennerlein, J. T., ... Christiani, D. C. (2004). Using "exposure prediction rules" for exposure assessment: An example on whole-body vibration in taxi drivers. Epidemiology, 15(3), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000121378.62340.a7

Using "exposure prediction rules" for exposure assessment : An example on whole-body vibration in taxi drivers. / Chen, Jiu Chiuan; Chang, Wen Ruey; Shih, Tung Sheng; Chen, Chiou Jong; Chang, Wushou P.; Dennerlein, Jack T.; Ryan, Louise M.; Christiani, David C.

In: Epidemiology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 05.2004, p. 293-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, JC, Chang, WR, Shih, TS, Chen, CJ, Chang, WP, Dennerlein, JT, Ryan, LM & Christiani, DC 2004, 'Using "exposure prediction rules" for exposure assessment: An example on whole-body vibration in taxi drivers', Epidemiology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000121378.62340.a7
Chen, Jiu Chiuan ; Chang, Wen Ruey ; Shih, Tung Sheng ; Chen, Chiou Jong ; Chang, Wushou P. ; Dennerlein, Jack T. ; Ryan, Louise M. ; Christiani, David C. / Using "exposure prediction rules" for exposure assessment : An example on whole-body vibration in taxi drivers. In: Epidemiology. 2004 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 293-299.
@article{9910a0d221e848af9267b8c1a00389c7,
title = "Using {"}exposure prediction rules{"} for exposure assessment: An example on whole-body vibration in taxi drivers",
abstract = "Background: It is often difficult and expensive to make direct measurements of an individual's occupational or environmental exposures in large epidemiologic studies. Methods: In this study, we used information collected in validation studies to develop a prediction rule for assessing exposure in a study with no direct measurement. We established a prediction rule through mixed-effect modeling of direct measurement data and information on observable exposure predictors and their interactions. Specifically, we used 383 measures of whole-body vibration from 247 professional taxi drivers and attempted to quantify vibration exposures for individuals in a large study on low back pain. Results: Using the {"}jackknife method,{"} we found that our prediction rule had an acceptably low relative prediction error of 11{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval-10-12{\%}). Implementing the prediction rule would result in measurement errors independent of low back pain and of all identified and observable predictors of whole-body vibration. We applied the predicted levels to compute each person's daily exposure, and found a strong association between the predicted daily whole-body vibration exposure and prevalence of low back pain. This supported the construct validity of the exposure prediction rule. Conclusions: The predictive and construct validity of our prediction rule suggests that this general statistical approach can be useful in other occupational settings to improve the quality of exposure assessment.",
author = "Chen, {Jiu Chiuan} and Chang, {Wen Ruey} and Shih, {Tung Sheng} and Chen, {Chiou Jong} and Chang, {Wushou P.} and Dennerlein, {Jack T.} and Ryan, {Louise M.} and Christiani, {David C.}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/01.ede.0000121378.62340.a7",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "293--299",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using "exposure prediction rules" for exposure assessment

T2 - An example on whole-body vibration in taxi drivers

AU - Chen, Jiu Chiuan

AU - Chang, Wen Ruey

AU - Shih, Tung Sheng

AU - Chen, Chiou Jong

AU - Chang, Wushou P.

AU - Dennerlein, Jack T.

AU - Ryan, Louise M.

AU - Christiani, David C.

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Background: It is often difficult and expensive to make direct measurements of an individual's occupational or environmental exposures in large epidemiologic studies. Methods: In this study, we used information collected in validation studies to develop a prediction rule for assessing exposure in a study with no direct measurement. We established a prediction rule through mixed-effect modeling of direct measurement data and information on observable exposure predictors and their interactions. Specifically, we used 383 measures of whole-body vibration from 247 professional taxi drivers and attempted to quantify vibration exposures for individuals in a large study on low back pain. Results: Using the "jackknife method," we found that our prediction rule had an acceptably low relative prediction error of 11% (95% confidence interval-10-12%). Implementing the prediction rule would result in measurement errors independent of low back pain and of all identified and observable predictors of whole-body vibration. We applied the predicted levels to compute each person's daily exposure, and found a strong association between the predicted daily whole-body vibration exposure and prevalence of low back pain. This supported the construct validity of the exposure prediction rule. Conclusions: The predictive and construct validity of our prediction rule suggests that this general statistical approach can be useful in other occupational settings to improve the quality of exposure assessment.

AB - Background: It is often difficult and expensive to make direct measurements of an individual's occupational or environmental exposures in large epidemiologic studies. Methods: In this study, we used information collected in validation studies to develop a prediction rule for assessing exposure in a study with no direct measurement. We established a prediction rule through mixed-effect modeling of direct measurement data and information on observable exposure predictors and their interactions. Specifically, we used 383 measures of whole-body vibration from 247 professional taxi drivers and attempted to quantify vibration exposures for individuals in a large study on low back pain. Results: Using the "jackknife method," we found that our prediction rule had an acceptably low relative prediction error of 11% (95% confidence interval-10-12%). Implementing the prediction rule would result in measurement errors independent of low back pain and of all identified and observable predictors of whole-body vibration. We applied the predicted levels to compute each person's daily exposure, and found a strong association between the predicted daily whole-body vibration exposure and prevalence of low back pain. This supported the construct validity of the exposure prediction rule. Conclusions: The predictive and construct validity of our prediction rule suggests that this general statistical approach can be useful in other occupational settings to improve the quality of exposure assessment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142721998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142721998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ede.0000121378.62340.a7

DO - 10.1097/01.ede.0000121378.62340.a7

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 293

EP - 299

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

IS - 3

ER -