Using Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation to Appraise Nursing Clinical Practice Guidelines in Taiwan and to Compare Them to International Studies

Kee Hsin Chen, Ching Chiu Kao, Hsueh Erh Liu, Wen Ta Chiu, Ken N. Kuo, Chieh Feng Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can reduce medical practice variations and enhance effectiveness. In 2008, the Taiwan Department of Health delegated the development of CPGs on six health topics. By February 2010, these CPGs had been completed. Methods: The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was used to assess the quality of the guidelines. We organized groups to develop CPGs and called on 131 experts with various specialties. Results: The average AGREE scores for the six major domains were 86% (scope and purpose), 63% (stakeholder involvement), 77% (rigor of development), 72% (clarity and presentation), 53% (applicability), and 69% (editorial independence). Conclusion: We recommend the following: (1) opinions from all stakeholders, especially patients, should be considered to improve the content of the guidelines; and (2) health education resources, audit forms, and other tools should be emphasized more in the development of CPGs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-61
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine(Taiwan)
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Practice Guidelines
Nursing
Guidelines
Health Resources
Health
Health Education

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Nursing clinical practice guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{2fe04c74c9cc40bf8aa89f9defadfadb,
title = "Using Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation to Appraise Nursing Clinical Practice Guidelines in Taiwan and to Compare Them to International Studies",
abstract = "Background: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can reduce medical practice variations and enhance effectiveness. In 2008, the Taiwan Department of Health delegated the development of CPGs on six health topics. By February 2010, these CPGs had been completed. Methods: The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was used to assess the quality of the guidelines. We organized groups to develop CPGs and called on 131 experts with various specialties. Results: The average AGREE scores for the six major domains were 86{\%} (scope and purpose), 63{\%} (stakeholder involvement), 77{\%} (rigor of development), 72{\%} (clarity and presentation), 53{\%} (applicability), and 69{\%} (editorial independence). Conclusion: We recommend the following: (1) opinions from all stakeholders, especially patients, should be considered to improve the content of the guidelines; and (2) health education resources, audit forms, and other tools should be emphasized more in the development of CPGs.",
keywords = "Evidence-based medicine, Nursing clinical practice guidelines",
author = "Chen, {Kee Hsin} and Kao, {Ching Chiu} and Liu, {Hsueh Erh} and Chiu, {Wen Ta} and Kuo, {Ken N.} and Chen, {Chieh Feng}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jecm.2011.11.010",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "58--61",
journal = "Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine",
issn = "1878-3317",
publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation to Appraise Nursing Clinical Practice Guidelines in Taiwan and to Compare Them to International Studies

AU - Chen, Kee Hsin

AU - Kao, Ching Chiu

AU - Liu, Hsueh Erh

AU - Chiu, Wen Ta

AU - Kuo, Ken N.

AU - Chen, Chieh Feng

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Background: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can reduce medical practice variations and enhance effectiveness. In 2008, the Taiwan Department of Health delegated the development of CPGs on six health topics. By February 2010, these CPGs had been completed. Methods: The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was used to assess the quality of the guidelines. We organized groups to develop CPGs and called on 131 experts with various specialties. Results: The average AGREE scores for the six major domains were 86% (scope and purpose), 63% (stakeholder involvement), 77% (rigor of development), 72% (clarity and presentation), 53% (applicability), and 69% (editorial independence). Conclusion: We recommend the following: (1) opinions from all stakeholders, especially patients, should be considered to improve the content of the guidelines; and (2) health education resources, audit forms, and other tools should be emphasized more in the development of CPGs.

AB - Background: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can reduce medical practice variations and enhance effectiveness. In 2008, the Taiwan Department of Health delegated the development of CPGs on six health topics. By February 2010, these CPGs had been completed. Methods: The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was used to assess the quality of the guidelines. We organized groups to develop CPGs and called on 131 experts with various specialties. Results: The average AGREE scores for the six major domains were 86% (scope and purpose), 63% (stakeholder involvement), 77% (rigor of development), 72% (clarity and presentation), 53% (applicability), and 69% (editorial independence). Conclusion: We recommend the following: (1) opinions from all stakeholders, especially patients, should be considered to improve the content of the guidelines; and (2) health education resources, audit forms, and other tools should be emphasized more in the development of CPGs.

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Nursing clinical practice guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856223872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856223872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jecm.2011.11.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jecm.2011.11.010

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 58

EP - 61

JO - Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine

JF - Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine

SN - 1878-3317

IS - 1

ER -