Two-level burst fractures

Clinical evaluation and treatment options

Tsung Jen Huang, Robert Wen Wei Hsu, Gwo Fong Fan, Jen Yuh Chen, Yi Shyan Liao, Yeung Jen Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two-level burst fractures are rare. In a series of 180 surgically treated spinal fracture-dislocations, seven had such injuries, with an incidence of 3.9%. Four had fracture sites without contiguity: C4-T12 (one), L1-L4 (one), L2-L4 (one), and L2-L5 (one); and three with contiguity: T12-L1 (one), L1-L2 (one), and L2-L3 (one). L2 was the most frequently involved site, accounting for four in seven. Falling from height was the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for four in seven. Five in seven patients (71%) sustained multiple injuries. Chest traumas and extremity fractures were the ones most frequently associated. All of these patients had incomplete neurologic deficits at initial presentation. In the four discontiguous bursts, the neurologic levels corresponded to the cephalic ones. Six patients had follow-up periods of more than 2 years. Transpediculate systems were used in five, and at follow-up, two had screw breakages. In this series, the average neurologic recovery was 1.3 grades on the Frankel scale. In conclusion, it is mandatory to have a thorough organ system review when such patients are first seen. Then each fracture site would be judged separately as either a stable or unstable burst preoperatively. Every effort should be made to treat any unstable segment via anterior, posterior, or combined approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-82
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nervous System
Wounds and Injuries
Spinal Fractures
Multiple Trauma
Therapeutics
Neurologic Manifestations
Thorax
Extremities
Head
Incidence
Fracture Dislocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Two-level burst fractures : Clinical evaluation and treatment options. / Huang, Tsung Jen; Hsu, Robert Wen Wei; Fan, Gwo Fong; Chen, Jen Yuh; Liao, Yi Shyan; Chen, Yeung Jen.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 41, No. 1, 07.1996, p. 77-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, Tsung Jen ; Hsu, Robert Wen Wei ; Fan, Gwo Fong ; Chen, Jen Yuh ; Liao, Yi Shyan ; Chen, Yeung Jen. / Two-level burst fractures : Clinical evaluation and treatment options. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1996 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 77-82.
@article{52bdbb77a8b9431bbed5e92786b34aec,
title = "Two-level burst fractures: Clinical evaluation and treatment options",
abstract = "Two-level burst fractures are rare. In a series of 180 surgically treated spinal fracture-dislocations, seven had such injuries, with an incidence of 3.9{\%}. Four had fracture sites without contiguity: C4-T12 (one), L1-L4 (one), L2-L4 (one), and L2-L5 (one); and three with contiguity: T12-L1 (one), L1-L2 (one), and L2-L3 (one). L2 was the most frequently involved site, accounting for four in seven. Falling from height was the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for four in seven. Five in seven patients (71{\%}) sustained multiple injuries. Chest traumas and extremity fractures were the ones most frequently associated. All of these patients had incomplete neurologic deficits at initial presentation. In the four discontiguous bursts, the neurologic levels corresponded to the cephalic ones. Six patients had follow-up periods of more than 2 years. Transpediculate systems were used in five, and at follow-up, two had screw breakages. In this series, the average neurologic recovery was 1.3 grades on the Frankel scale. In conclusion, it is mandatory to have a thorough organ system review when such patients are first seen. Then each fracture site would be judged separately as either a stable or unstable burst preoperatively. Every effort should be made to treat any unstable segment via anterior, posterior, or combined approaches.",
author = "Huang, {Tsung Jen} and Hsu, {Robert Wen Wei} and Fan, {Gwo Fong} and Chen, {Jen Yuh} and Liao, {Yi Shyan} and Chen, {Yeung Jen}",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-199607000-00012",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "77--82",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-level burst fractures

T2 - Clinical evaluation and treatment options

AU - Huang, Tsung Jen

AU - Hsu, Robert Wen Wei

AU - Fan, Gwo Fong

AU - Chen, Jen Yuh

AU - Liao, Yi Shyan

AU - Chen, Yeung Jen

PY - 1996/7

Y1 - 1996/7

N2 - Two-level burst fractures are rare. In a series of 180 surgically treated spinal fracture-dislocations, seven had such injuries, with an incidence of 3.9%. Four had fracture sites without contiguity: C4-T12 (one), L1-L4 (one), L2-L4 (one), and L2-L5 (one); and three with contiguity: T12-L1 (one), L1-L2 (one), and L2-L3 (one). L2 was the most frequently involved site, accounting for four in seven. Falling from height was the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for four in seven. Five in seven patients (71%) sustained multiple injuries. Chest traumas and extremity fractures were the ones most frequently associated. All of these patients had incomplete neurologic deficits at initial presentation. In the four discontiguous bursts, the neurologic levels corresponded to the cephalic ones. Six patients had follow-up periods of more than 2 years. Transpediculate systems were used in five, and at follow-up, two had screw breakages. In this series, the average neurologic recovery was 1.3 grades on the Frankel scale. In conclusion, it is mandatory to have a thorough organ system review when such patients are first seen. Then each fracture site would be judged separately as either a stable or unstable burst preoperatively. Every effort should be made to treat any unstable segment via anterior, posterior, or combined approaches.

AB - Two-level burst fractures are rare. In a series of 180 surgically treated spinal fracture-dislocations, seven had such injuries, with an incidence of 3.9%. Four had fracture sites without contiguity: C4-T12 (one), L1-L4 (one), L2-L4 (one), and L2-L5 (one); and three with contiguity: T12-L1 (one), L1-L2 (one), and L2-L3 (one). L2 was the most frequently involved site, accounting for four in seven. Falling from height was the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for four in seven. Five in seven patients (71%) sustained multiple injuries. Chest traumas and extremity fractures were the ones most frequently associated. All of these patients had incomplete neurologic deficits at initial presentation. In the four discontiguous bursts, the neurologic levels corresponded to the cephalic ones. Six patients had follow-up periods of more than 2 years. Transpediculate systems were used in five, and at follow-up, two had screw breakages. In this series, the average neurologic recovery was 1.3 grades on the Frankel scale. In conclusion, it is mandatory to have a thorough organ system review when such patients are first seen. Then each fracture site would be judged separately as either a stable or unstable burst preoperatively. Every effort should be made to treat any unstable segment via anterior, posterior, or combined approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029893971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029893971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-199607000-00012

DO - 10.1097/00005373-199607000-00012

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 77

EP - 82

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -