Transurethral electrovapor resection versus standard transurethral resection treatment for a large prostate: A 2-year follow-up study conducted in Taiwan

Chih Kuang Liu, Wen Kai Lee, Ming Chung Ko, Han-Sun Chiang, Kong Sang Wan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Those patients featuring a large prostate and undergoing transurethral resection typically face a longer duration of surgery, they have a higher degree of hemorrhage and a higher irrigant volume required for the procedure, and they tend to reflect a higher incidence of morbidity than is the case for a small prostate. We report on the relative safety and efficacy of transurethral electrovapor resection of the prostate (TUVRP) as compared with standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for Taiwanese patients having a prostate size >50 ml. Patients and Methods: Seventy-six symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia patients featuring a prostate size >50 ml were randomized and underwent either TUVRP using wedge loop or standard TURP. Perioperative parameters, treatment outcome, and adverse events associated with the surgical procedure are assessed herein. Results: Mean operation time, changes in hemoglobin levels, resected prostate weight, perioperative irrigant volume needed, and incidences of recatheterizations and readmissions, all differed significantly when the two surgical procedures were compared. The average expense differences for the two procedures were impressive (p <0.0001). No postoperative intergroup sexual dysfunction differences were noted. Clinical improvements following either TUVRP or TURP were significant and sustained for at least a period of 2 years, Intergroup comparison of International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, peak flow rate, and postvoid residual volume revealed no significant differences at 2 years (p = 0.45, 0.48, 0.12, and 0.29, respectively). The need for postoperative medical retreatment and/or reoperation did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.62 and p = 0.56, respectively, at 6 months and p = 0.47 and p = 0.48, respectively, at 2 years). Conclusions: The TUVRP procedure offers advantages as regards a number of perioperative parameters when compared with the TURP procedure, and it seems that TUVRP might provide at least an equivalent treatment outcome as is the case for TURP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-149
Number of pages6
JournalUrologia Internationalis
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transurethral Resection of Prostate
Taiwan
varespladib methyl
Prostate
Therapeutics
Residual Volume
Retreatment
Incidence
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Reoperation
Hemoglobins
Quality of Life
Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia
  • Standard transurethral resection, prostate
  • Transurethral electrovapor resection, prostate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Transurethral electrovapor resection versus standard transurethral resection treatment for a large prostate : A 2-year follow-up study conducted in Taiwan. / Liu, Chih Kuang; Lee, Wen Kai; Ko, Ming Chung; Chiang, Han-Sun; Wan, Kong Sang.

In: Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2006, p. 144-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liu, Chih Kuang ; Lee, Wen Kai ; Ko, Ming Chung ; Chiang, Han-Sun ; Wan, Kong Sang. / Transurethral electrovapor resection versus standard transurethral resection treatment for a large prostate : A 2-year follow-up study conducted in Taiwan. In: Urologia Internationalis. 2006 ; Vol. 76, No. 2. pp. 144-149.
@article{d7215cc2d9ed4255a2a7aea990d8e748,
title = "Transurethral electrovapor resection versus standard transurethral resection treatment for a large prostate: A 2-year follow-up study conducted in Taiwan",
abstract = "Introduction: Those patients featuring a large prostate and undergoing transurethral resection typically face a longer duration of surgery, they have a higher degree of hemorrhage and a higher irrigant volume required for the procedure, and they tend to reflect a higher incidence of morbidity than is the case for a small prostate. We report on the relative safety and efficacy of transurethral electrovapor resection of the prostate (TUVRP) as compared with standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for Taiwanese patients having a prostate size >50 ml. Patients and Methods: Seventy-six symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia patients featuring a prostate size >50 ml were randomized and underwent either TUVRP using wedge loop or standard TURP. Perioperative parameters, treatment outcome, and adverse events associated with the surgical procedure are assessed herein. Results: Mean operation time, changes in hemoglobin levels, resected prostate weight, perioperative irrigant volume needed, and incidences of recatheterizations and readmissions, all differed significantly when the two surgical procedures were compared. The average expense differences for the two procedures were impressive (p <0.0001). No postoperative intergroup sexual dysfunction differences were noted. Clinical improvements following either TUVRP or TURP were significant and sustained for at least a period of 2 years, Intergroup comparison of International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, peak flow rate, and postvoid residual volume revealed no significant differences at 2 years (p = 0.45, 0.48, 0.12, and 0.29, respectively). The need for postoperative medical retreatment and/or reoperation did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.62 and p = 0.56, respectively, at 6 months and p = 0.47 and p = 0.48, respectively, at 2 years). Conclusions: The TUVRP procedure offers advantages as regards a number of perioperative parameters when compared with the TURP procedure, and it seems that TUVRP might provide at least an equivalent treatment outcome as is the case for TURP.",
keywords = "Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Standard transurethral resection, prostate, Transurethral electrovapor resection, prostate",
author = "Liu, {Chih Kuang} and Lee, {Wen Kai} and Ko, {Ming Chung} and Han-Sun Chiang and Wan, {Kong Sang}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1159/000090878",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "144--149",
journal = "Urologia Internationalis",
issn = "0042-1138",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transurethral electrovapor resection versus standard transurethral resection treatment for a large prostate

T2 - A 2-year follow-up study conducted in Taiwan

AU - Liu, Chih Kuang

AU - Lee, Wen Kai

AU - Ko, Ming Chung

AU - Chiang, Han-Sun

AU - Wan, Kong Sang

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Introduction: Those patients featuring a large prostate and undergoing transurethral resection typically face a longer duration of surgery, they have a higher degree of hemorrhage and a higher irrigant volume required for the procedure, and they tend to reflect a higher incidence of morbidity than is the case for a small prostate. We report on the relative safety and efficacy of transurethral electrovapor resection of the prostate (TUVRP) as compared with standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for Taiwanese patients having a prostate size >50 ml. Patients and Methods: Seventy-six symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia patients featuring a prostate size >50 ml were randomized and underwent either TUVRP using wedge loop or standard TURP. Perioperative parameters, treatment outcome, and adverse events associated with the surgical procedure are assessed herein. Results: Mean operation time, changes in hemoglobin levels, resected prostate weight, perioperative irrigant volume needed, and incidences of recatheterizations and readmissions, all differed significantly when the two surgical procedures were compared. The average expense differences for the two procedures were impressive (p <0.0001). No postoperative intergroup sexual dysfunction differences were noted. Clinical improvements following either TUVRP or TURP were significant and sustained for at least a period of 2 years, Intergroup comparison of International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, peak flow rate, and postvoid residual volume revealed no significant differences at 2 years (p = 0.45, 0.48, 0.12, and 0.29, respectively). The need for postoperative medical retreatment and/or reoperation did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.62 and p = 0.56, respectively, at 6 months and p = 0.47 and p = 0.48, respectively, at 2 years). Conclusions: The TUVRP procedure offers advantages as regards a number of perioperative parameters when compared with the TURP procedure, and it seems that TUVRP might provide at least an equivalent treatment outcome as is the case for TURP.

AB - Introduction: Those patients featuring a large prostate and undergoing transurethral resection typically face a longer duration of surgery, they have a higher degree of hemorrhage and a higher irrigant volume required for the procedure, and they tend to reflect a higher incidence of morbidity than is the case for a small prostate. We report on the relative safety and efficacy of transurethral electrovapor resection of the prostate (TUVRP) as compared with standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for Taiwanese patients having a prostate size >50 ml. Patients and Methods: Seventy-six symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia patients featuring a prostate size >50 ml were randomized and underwent either TUVRP using wedge loop or standard TURP. Perioperative parameters, treatment outcome, and adverse events associated with the surgical procedure are assessed herein. Results: Mean operation time, changes in hemoglobin levels, resected prostate weight, perioperative irrigant volume needed, and incidences of recatheterizations and readmissions, all differed significantly when the two surgical procedures were compared. The average expense differences for the two procedures were impressive (p <0.0001). No postoperative intergroup sexual dysfunction differences were noted. Clinical improvements following either TUVRP or TURP were significant and sustained for at least a period of 2 years, Intergroup comparison of International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, peak flow rate, and postvoid residual volume revealed no significant differences at 2 years (p = 0.45, 0.48, 0.12, and 0.29, respectively). The need for postoperative medical retreatment and/or reoperation did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.62 and p = 0.56, respectively, at 6 months and p = 0.47 and p = 0.48, respectively, at 2 years). Conclusions: The TUVRP procedure offers advantages as regards a number of perioperative parameters when compared with the TURP procedure, and it seems that TUVRP might provide at least an equivalent treatment outcome as is the case for TURP.

KW - Benign prostatic hyperplasia

KW - Standard transurethral resection, prostate

KW - Transurethral electrovapor resection, prostate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745036163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745036163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000090878

DO - 10.1159/000090878

M3 - Article

C2 - 16493216

AN - SCOPUS:33745036163

VL - 76

SP - 144

EP - 149

JO - Urologia Internationalis

JF - Urologia Internationalis

SN - 0042-1138

IS - 2

ER -