Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia: Comparison with open approach

Chun Hui Lin, Yih Cherng Duh, Yu Wei Fu, Yao Jen Hsu, Chin Hung Wei

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study is to evaluate our initial experiences of thoracoscopic repair (TR) for esophageal atresia with/without trachoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and also to compare the results with open repair (OR). Subjects and Methods: Patients with EA/TEF who received surgeries in our institution between July 2009 and June 2015 were included in the study. The medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients are divided into two groups as follows: TR and OR. Parameters collected includes demographics, operation time, conversion, time to oral feeding, length of hospital stay, complications, and growth status. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon rank sum test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test. Results: A total of 21 patients with EA/TEF, 19 with type C and 2 with type A, were enrolled. There were 9 and 12 patients in TR and OR groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in demographics between both groups. Median operation time was significantly longer in TR (197.5 vs. 115 min, P < 0.01). The operations were converted in the initial three patients. In the following six patients, only one patient with pure EA required conversion. Median time to oral feeding was significantly longer in TR (12 vs. 7 days, P = 0.04). Anastomotic leakage occurred in three and one patients, respectively (33.3% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.27). Esophageal dilatation was required in 3 (33.3%) and 4 (33.3%) patients for esophageal stenosis in TR and OR groups, respectively (P = 0.999). Fundoplication was required in 2 (22.2%) and 3 (25%) patients of TR and OR groups, respectively (P = 1.00). Recurrent TEF developed in one patient (11.1%) of TR. The bodyweight fell behind 3 percentiles of the growth curve in 6 (66.7%) and 6 (50%) patients (P = 0.660). Conclusions: TR for EA/TEF is feasible. The initial experiences revealed longer operation time and higher complication rate compared to OR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-110
Number of pages6
JournalFormosan Journal of Surgery
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esophageal Atresia
Fistula
Nonparametric Statistics
Length of Stay
Demography
Esophageal Stenosis
Fundoplication
Anastomotic Leak
Growth
Medical Records
Dilatation

Keywords

  • Esophageal atresia
  • esophageal dysmotility
  • thoracoscopy
  • tracheoesophageal fistula

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia : Comparison with open approach. / Lin, Chun Hui; Duh, Yih Cherng; Fu, Yu Wei; Hsu, Yao Jen; Wei, Chin Hung.

In: Formosan Journal of Surgery, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 105-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, Chun Hui ; Duh, Yih Cherng ; Fu, Yu Wei ; Hsu, Yao Jen ; Wei, Chin Hung. / Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia : Comparison with open approach. In: Formosan Journal of Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 105-110.
@article{04574e6ff6704287b6c03c556a3876d1,
title = "Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia: Comparison with open approach",
abstract = "Background: The aim of the present study is to evaluate our initial experiences of thoracoscopic repair (TR) for esophageal atresia with/without trachoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and also to compare the results with open repair (OR). Subjects and Methods: Patients with EA/TEF who received surgeries in our institution between July 2009 and June 2015 were included in the study. The medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients are divided into two groups as follows: TR and OR. Parameters collected includes demographics, operation time, conversion, time to oral feeding, length of hospital stay, complications, and growth status. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon rank sum test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test. Results: A total of 21 patients with EA/TEF, 19 with type C and 2 with type A, were enrolled. There were 9 and 12 patients in TR and OR groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in demographics between both groups. Median operation time was significantly longer in TR (197.5 vs. 115 min, P < 0.01). The operations were converted in the initial three patients. In the following six patients, only one patient with pure EA required conversion. Median time to oral feeding was significantly longer in TR (12 vs. 7 days, P = 0.04). Anastomotic leakage occurred in three and one patients, respectively (33.3{\%} vs. 8.3{\%}, P = 0.27). Esophageal dilatation was required in 3 (33.3{\%}) and 4 (33.3{\%}) patients for esophageal stenosis in TR and OR groups, respectively (P = 0.999). Fundoplication was required in 2 (22.2{\%}) and 3 (25{\%}) patients of TR and OR groups, respectively (P = 1.00). Recurrent TEF developed in one patient (11.1{\%}) of TR. The bodyweight fell behind 3 percentiles of the growth curve in 6 (66.7{\%}) and 6 (50{\%}) patients (P = 0.660). Conclusions: TR for EA/TEF is feasible. The initial experiences revealed longer operation time and higher complication rate compared to OR.",
keywords = "Esophageal atresia, esophageal dysmotility, thoracoscopy, tracheoesophageal fistula",
author = "Lin, {Chun Hui} and Duh, {Yih Cherng} and Fu, {Yu Wei} and Hsu, {Yao Jen} and Wei, {Chin Hung}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/fjs.fjs_145_17",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "105--110",
journal = "Formosan Journal of Surgery",
issn = "1011-6788",
publisher = "臺灣外科醫學會",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia

T2 - Comparison with open approach

AU - Lin, Chun Hui

AU - Duh, Yih Cherng

AU - Fu, Yu Wei

AU - Hsu, Yao Jen

AU - Wei, Chin Hung

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Background: The aim of the present study is to evaluate our initial experiences of thoracoscopic repair (TR) for esophageal atresia with/without trachoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and also to compare the results with open repair (OR). Subjects and Methods: Patients with EA/TEF who received surgeries in our institution between July 2009 and June 2015 were included in the study. The medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients are divided into two groups as follows: TR and OR. Parameters collected includes demographics, operation time, conversion, time to oral feeding, length of hospital stay, complications, and growth status. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon rank sum test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test. Results: A total of 21 patients with EA/TEF, 19 with type C and 2 with type A, were enrolled. There were 9 and 12 patients in TR and OR groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in demographics between both groups. Median operation time was significantly longer in TR (197.5 vs. 115 min, P < 0.01). The operations were converted in the initial three patients. In the following six patients, only one patient with pure EA required conversion. Median time to oral feeding was significantly longer in TR (12 vs. 7 days, P = 0.04). Anastomotic leakage occurred in three and one patients, respectively (33.3% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.27). Esophageal dilatation was required in 3 (33.3%) and 4 (33.3%) patients for esophageal stenosis in TR and OR groups, respectively (P = 0.999). Fundoplication was required in 2 (22.2%) and 3 (25%) patients of TR and OR groups, respectively (P = 1.00). Recurrent TEF developed in one patient (11.1%) of TR. The bodyweight fell behind 3 percentiles of the growth curve in 6 (66.7%) and 6 (50%) patients (P = 0.660). Conclusions: TR for EA/TEF is feasible. The initial experiences revealed longer operation time and higher complication rate compared to OR.

AB - Background: The aim of the present study is to evaluate our initial experiences of thoracoscopic repair (TR) for esophageal atresia with/without trachoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and also to compare the results with open repair (OR). Subjects and Methods: Patients with EA/TEF who received surgeries in our institution between July 2009 and June 2015 were included in the study. The medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients are divided into two groups as follows: TR and OR. Parameters collected includes demographics, operation time, conversion, time to oral feeding, length of hospital stay, complications, and growth status. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon rank sum test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test. Results: A total of 21 patients with EA/TEF, 19 with type C and 2 with type A, were enrolled. There were 9 and 12 patients in TR and OR groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in demographics between both groups. Median operation time was significantly longer in TR (197.5 vs. 115 min, P < 0.01). The operations were converted in the initial three patients. In the following six patients, only one patient with pure EA required conversion. Median time to oral feeding was significantly longer in TR (12 vs. 7 days, P = 0.04). Anastomotic leakage occurred in three and one patients, respectively (33.3% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.27). Esophageal dilatation was required in 3 (33.3%) and 4 (33.3%) patients for esophageal stenosis in TR and OR groups, respectively (P = 0.999). Fundoplication was required in 2 (22.2%) and 3 (25%) patients of TR and OR groups, respectively (P = 1.00). Recurrent TEF developed in one patient (11.1%) of TR. The bodyweight fell behind 3 percentiles of the growth curve in 6 (66.7%) and 6 (50%) patients (P = 0.660). Conclusions: TR for EA/TEF is feasible. The initial experiences revealed longer operation time and higher complication rate compared to OR.

KW - Esophageal atresia

KW - esophageal dysmotility

KW - thoracoscopy

KW - tracheoesophageal fistula

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049413050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049413050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/fjs.fjs_145_17

DO - 10.4103/fjs.fjs_145_17

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049413050

VL - 51

SP - 105

EP - 110

JO - Formosan Journal of Surgery

JF - Formosan Journal of Surgery

SN - 1011-6788

IS - 3

ER -