划船測功儀對大學男生有氧能力評估之探討

Translated title of the contribution: The Use of Rowing Ergometer to Evaluate the Aerobic Capacity of Male College-Aged Adults

鍾雨純, 陳麗玉, 陳竑廷, 吳慧君

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using rowing ergometer to measure maximum aerobic capacity, as well as to compare the maximum aerobic capacity measured by rowing ergometer and treadmill. The subjects were 18 college-aged adults who engaged in regular exercise (aged 22±1.8yr, height 173.2±3.4 cm, weight 65.6±7.3 kg). The subjected were randomly divided into two groups by using a counterbalanced design. Subjects in group A were tested by using treadmill in the first test and using rowing ergometer in the second test. Subjects in group B were tested in a reversed order. Three days of rest was given between the first and the second test. Bruce protocol was used in the treadmill test, while in the rowing ergometer test, the rowing frequency was set at 30 per min with wind speed level 5, and the starting load was set at 50W and progressively increased by 30W every 3 min. The Mobile wireless metabolic analyzer Meta Max was used to measure the aerobic capacity in both the treadmill and rowing test. Data were analyzed by using paired t-test and the α level was set at .05. The result revealed that the VO(subscript 2max)(9.48±5.45 vs. 44.15±4.33 ml•kg^(-1)•min^(-1), p<.05) and VE(subscript max) (122.17±18.1vs. 105.68±14.72 L•min^(-1), p<.05) obtained from the treadmill test were significantly higher than the rowing ergometer. It was concluded that because of the exercise mode of the treadmill, the aerobic capacity measured by using treadmill is more valid than rowing ergometer. However, because of the relative convenience and low cost of the rowing ergometer, it is suggested that the aerobic capacity measured by treadmill protocol can be used as the criterion variable to develop a regression equation for rowing ergometer.
Original languageTraditional Chinese
Pages (from-to)27-36
Number of pages10
Journal運動教練科學
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise Test
Weights and Measures
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • VO2max
  • VEmax
  • rowing ergometer
  • Bruce protocol

Cite this

划船測功儀對大學男生有氧能力評估之探討. / 鍾雨純; 陳麗玉; 陳竑廷; 吳慧君.

In: 運動教練科學, No. 18, 2010, p. 27-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

鍾雨純 ; 陳麗玉 ; 陳竑廷 ; 吳慧君. / 划船測功儀對大學男生有氧能力評估之探討. In: 運動教練科學. 2010 ; No. 18. pp. 27-36.
@article{7bed210d370449e2b618860636dee38b,
title = "划船測功儀對大學男生有氧能力評估之探討",
abstract = "The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using rowing ergometer to measure maximum aerobic capacity, as well as to compare the maximum aerobic capacity measured by rowing ergometer and treadmill. The subjects were 18 college-aged adults who engaged in regular exercise (aged 22±1.8yr, height 173.2±3.4 cm, weight 65.6±7.3 kg). The subjected were randomly divided into two groups by using a counterbalanced design. Subjects in group A were tested by using treadmill in the first test and using rowing ergometer in the second test. Subjects in group B were tested in a reversed order. Three days of rest was given between the first and the second test. Bruce protocol was used in the treadmill test, while in the rowing ergometer test, the rowing frequency was set at 30 per min with wind speed level 5, and the starting load was set at 50W and progressively increased by 30W every 3 min. The Mobile wireless metabolic analyzer Meta Max was used to measure the aerobic capacity in both the treadmill and rowing test. Data were analyzed by using paired t-test and the α level was set at .05. The result revealed that the VO(subscript 2max)(9.48±5.45 vs. 44.15±4.33 ml•kg^(-1)•min^(-1), p<.05) and VE(subscript max) (122.17±18.1vs. 105.68±14.72 L•min^(-1), p<.05) obtained from the treadmill test were significantly higher than the rowing ergometer. It was concluded that because of the exercise mode of the treadmill, the aerobic capacity measured by using treadmill is more valid than rowing ergometer. However, because of the relative convenience and low cost of the rowing ergometer, it is suggested that the aerobic capacity measured by treadmill protocol can be used as the criterion variable to develop a regression equation for rowing ergometer.",
keywords = "攝氧峰值, 最大換氣量, Bruce protocol, 划船測功儀, VO2max, VEmax, rowing ergometer, Bruce protocol",
author = "鍾雨純 and 陳麗玉 and 陳竑廷 and 吳慧君",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.6194/SCS.2010.18.03",
language = "繁體中文",
pages = "27--36",
journal = "運動教練科學",
issn = "1818-2801",
publisher = "中華民國運動教練學會&Airiti Press Inc.",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 划船測功儀對大學男生有氧能力評估之探討

AU - 鍾雨純, null

AU - 陳麗玉, null

AU - 陳竑廷, null

AU - 吳慧君, null

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using rowing ergometer to measure maximum aerobic capacity, as well as to compare the maximum aerobic capacity measured by rowing ergometer and treadmill. The subjects were 18 college-aged adults who engaged in regular exercise (aged 22±1.8yr, height 173.2±3.4 cm, weight 65.6±7.3 kg). The subjected were randomly divided into two groups by using a counterbalanced design. Subjects in group A were tested by using treadmill in the first test and using rowing ergometer in the second test. Subjects in group B were tested in a reversed order. Three days of rest was given between the first and the second test. Bruce protocol was used in the treadmill test, while in the rowing ergometer test, the rowing frequency was set at 30 per min with wind speed level 5, and the starting load was set at 50W and progressively increased by 30W every 3 min. The Mobile wireless metabolic analyzer Meta Max was used to measure the aerobic capacity in both the treadmill and rowing test. Data were analyzed by using paired t-test and the α level was set at .05. The result revealed that the VO(subscript 2max)(9.48±5.45 vs. 44.15±4.33 ml•kg^(-1)•min^(-1), p<.05) and VE(subscript max) (122.17±18.1vs. 105.68±14.72 L•min^(-1), p<.05) obtained from the treadmill test were significantly higher than the rowing ergometer. It was concluded that because of the exercise mode of the treadmill, the aerobic capacity measured by using treadmill is more valid than rowing ergometer. However, because of the relative convenience and low cost of the rowing ergometer, it is suggested that the aerobic capacity measured by treadmill protocol can be used as the criterion variable to develop a regression equation for rowing ergometer.

AB - The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using rowing ergometer to measure maximum aerobic capacity, as well as to compare the maximum aerobic capacity measured by rowing ergometer and treadmill. The subjects were 18 college-aged adults who engaged in regular exercise (aged 22±1.8yr, height 173.2±3.4 cm, weight 65.6±7.3 kg). The subjected were randomly divided into two groups by using a counterbalanced design. Subjects in group A were tested by using treadmill in the first test and using rowing ergometer in the second test. Subjects in group B were tested in a reversed order. Three days of rest was given between the first and the second test. Bruce protocol was used in the treadmill test, while in the rowing ergometer test, the rowing frequency was set at 30 per min with wind speed level 5, and the starting load was set at 50W and progressively increased by 30W every 3 min. The Mobile wireless metabolic analyzer Meta Max was used to measure the aerobic capacity in both the treadmill and rowing test. Data were analyzed by using paired t-test and the α level was set at .05. The result revealed that the VO(subscript 2max)(9.48±5.45 vs. 44.15±4.33 ml•kg^(-1)•min^(-1), p<.05) and VE(subscript max) (122.17±18.1vs. 105.68±14.72 L•min^(-1), p<.05) obtained from the treadmill test were significantly higher than the rowing ergometer. It was concluded that because of the exercise mode of the treadmill, the aerobic capacity measured by using treadmill is more valid than rowing ergometer. However, because of the relative convenience and low cost of the rowing ergometer, it is suggested that the aerobic capacity measured by treadmill protocol can be used as the criterion variable to develop a regression equation for rowing ergometer.

KW - 攝氧峰值

KW - 最大換氣量

KW - Bruce protocol

KW - 划船測功儀

KW - VO2max

KW - VEmax

KW - rowing ergometer

KW - Bruce protocol

U2 - 10.6194/SCS.2010.18.03

DO - 10.6194/SCS.2010.18.03

M3 - 文章

SP - 27

EP - 36

JO - 運動教練科學

JF - 運動教練科學

SN - 1818-2801

IS - 18

ER -