The role of emergency ultrasound for evaluating acute pyelonephritis in the ED

Kuo Chih Chen, Shih Wen Hung, Vei Ken Seow, Chee Fah Chong, Tzong Luen Wang, Yu Chuan Li, Hang Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Controversy remains over the imaging method of choice for evaluating acute pyelonephritis (APN) in the emergency department (ED). Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of patients presented to the ED with APN. Methods: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. A cohort of ED patients diagnosed as APN were prospectively registered, and their medical records were then retrospectively reviewed for the presence of complications (admitted >14 days, admission to intensive care unit, or received invasive procedures), significant abnormalities (hydronephrosis, polycystic kidney diseases, renal abscess, emphysematous pyelonephritis), and mild abnormalities (cysts, stones, swelling). Results: The study included 243 patients. Most of the patients received one or more renal imaging studies (n = 206) and 39.5% of which were considered abnormal. The rates of significant abnormalities on different imaging methods were Kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB), 16.3%; emergency ultrasound (EUS), 39.6%; combination of KUB and EUS, 56.6%; and computed tomography, 58.8%. Factors contributed to complicated APN were elderly, male, a history of preexisting renal diseases, current use of catheters, previous renal calculi, and diabetes mellitus. Significant abnormalities can be identified by EUS in 61% of patients with complicated APN. In fact, the presence of significant sonographic abnormalities effectively diverted 34.3% of patients to receive surgical interventions (percutaneous nephrostomy, abscess aspiration, ureteroscopic stone manipulation, lithotripsy, or nephrectomy). Conclusion: Structural abnormalities are not uncommon in ED patients with APN. Early assessment of these patients with EUS is likely to have a great impact on their diagnosis and management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)721-724
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Pyelonephritis
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergencies
Kidney
Ureter
Abscess
Urinary Bladder
Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Polycystic Kidney Diseases
Preexisting Condition Coverage
Kidney Calculi
Lithotripsy
Hydronephrosis
Nephrectomy
Medical Records
Intensive Care Units
Cysts
Diabetes Mellitus
Catheters
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The role of emergency ultrasound for evaluating acute pyelonephritis in the ED. / Chen, Kuo Chih; Hung, Shih Wen; Seow, Vei Ken; Chong, Chee Fah; Wang, Tzong Luen; Li, Yu Chuan; Chang, Hang.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 7, 09.2011, p. 721-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Kuo Chih ; Hung, Shih Wen ; Seow, Vei Ken ; Chong, Chee Fah ; Wang, Tzong Luen ; Li, Yu Chuan ; Chang, Hang. / The role of emergency ultrasound for evaluating acute pyelonephritis in the ED. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 29, No. 7. pp. 721-724.
@article{bec96284be5741789c83b5feb0c11f52,
title = "The role of emergency ultrasound for evaluating acute pyelonephritis in the ED",
abstract = "Background: Controversy remains over the imaging method of choice for evaluating acute pyelonephritis (APN) in the emergency department (ED). Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of patients presented to the ED with APN. Methods: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. A cohort of ED patients diagnosed as APN were prospectively registered, and their medical records were then retrospectively reviewed for the presence of complications (admitted >14 days, admission to intensive care unit, or received invasive procedures), significant abnormalities (hydronephrosis, polycystic kidney diseases, renal abscess, emphysematous pyelonephritis), and mild abnormalities (cysts, stones, swelling). Results: The study included 243 patients. Most of the patients received one or more renal imaging studies (n = 206) and 39.5{\%} of which were considered abnormal. The rates of significant abnormalities on different imaging methods were Kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB), 16.3{\%}; emergency ultrasound (EUS), 39.6{\%}; combination of KUB and EUS, 56.6{\%}; and computed tomography, 58.8{\%}. Factors contributed to complicated APN were elderly, male, a history of preexisting renal diseases, current use of catheters, previous renal calculi, and diabetes mellitus. Significant abnormalities can be identified by EUS in 61{\%} of patients with complicated APN. In fact, the presence of significant sonographic abnormalities effectively diverted 34.3{\%} of patients to receive surgical interventions (percutaneous nephrostomy, abscess aspiration, ureteroscopic stone manipulation, lithotripsy, or nephrectomy). Conclusion: Structural abnormalities are not uncommon in ED patients with APN. Early assessment of these patients with EUS is likely to have a great impact on their diagnosis and management.",
author = "Chen, {Kuo Chih} and Hung, {Shih Wen} and Seow, {Vei Ken} and Chong, {Chee Fah} and Wang, {Tzong Luen} and Li, {Yu Chuan} and Hang Chang",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.047",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "721--724",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of emergency ultrasound for evaluating acute pyelonephritis in the ED

AU - Chen, Kuo Chih

AU - Hung, Shih Wen

AU - Seow, Vei Ken

AU - Chong, Chee Fah

AU - Wang, Tzong Luen

AU - Li, Yu Chuan

AU - Chang, Hang

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Background: Controversy remains over the imaging method of choice for evaluating acute pyelonephritis (APN) in the emergency department (ED). Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of patients presented to the ED with APN. Methods: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. A cohort of ED patients diagnosed as APN were prospectively registered, and their medical records were then retrospectively reviewed for the presence of complications (admitted >14 days, admission to intensive care unit, or received invasive procedures), significant abnormalities (hydronephrosis, polycystic kidney diseases, renal abscess, emphysematous pyelonephritis), and mild abnormalities (cysts, stones, swelling). Results: The study included 243 patients. Most of the patients received one or more renal imaging studies (n = 206) and 39.5% of which were considered abnormal. The rates of significant abnormalities on different imaging methods were Kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB), 16.3%; emergency ultrasound (EUS), 39.6%; combination of KUB and EUS, 56.6%; and computed tomography, 58.8%. Factors contributed to complicated APN were elderly, male, a history of preexisting renal diseases, current use of catheters, previous renal calculi, and diabetes mellitus. Significant abnormalities can be identified by EUS in 61% of patients with complicated APN. In fact, the presence of significant sonographic abnormalities effectively diverted 34.3% of patients to receive surgical interventions (percutaneous nephrostomy, abscess aspiration, ureteroscopic stone manipulation, lithotripsy, or nephrectomy). Conclusion: Structural abnormalities are not uncommon in ED patients with APN. Early assessment of these patients with EUS is likely to have a great impact on their diagnosis and management.

AB - Background: Controversy remains over the imaging method of choice for evaluating acute pyelonephritis (APN) in the emergency department (ED). Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of patients presented to the ED with APN. Methods: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. A cohort of ED patients diagnosed as APN were prospectively registered, and their medical records were then retrospectively reviewed for the presence of complications (admitted >14 days, admission to intensive care unit, or received invasive procedures), significant abnormalities (hydronephrosis, polycystic kidney diseases, renal abscess, emphysematous pyelonephritis), and mild abnormalities (cysts, stones, swelling). Results: The study included 243 patients. Most of the patients received one or more renal imaging studies (n = 206) and 39.5% of which were considered abnormal. The rates of significant abnormalities on different imaging methods were Kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB), 16.3%; emergency ultrasound (EUS), 39.6%; combination of KUB and EUS, 56.6%; and computed tomography, 58.8%. Factors contributed to complicated APN were elderly, male, a history of preexisting renal diseases, current use of catheters, previous renal calculi, and diabetes mellitus. Significant abnormalities can be identified by EUS in 61% of patients with complicated APN. In fact, the presence of significant sonographic abnormalities effectively diverted 34.3% of patients to receive surgical interventions (percutaneous nephrostomy, abscess aspiration, ureteroscopic stone manipulation, lithotripsy, or nephrectomy). Conclusion: Structural abnormalities are not uncommon in ED patients with APN. Early assessment of these patients with EUS is likely to have a great impact on their diagnosis and management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052233761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052233761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.047

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 20825875

AN - SCOPUS:80052233761

VL - 29

SP - 721

EP - 724

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 7

ER -