The risk of malpractice litigation in care to head-injury patients in comparison with other high-risk patient groups: an inpatient-based epidemiological study in Taiwan

Che Ming Yang, Wen Ta Chiu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of being sued in district courts for care for head-injury patients from the perspective of epidemiology. Methods: This research was designed to be a retrospective population-based cohort study. We researched the incidences of litigations arising from head-injury inpatients under neurosurgical care, all neurosurgical inpatients, and birth inpatients in Taiwan, and computed their relative risks. The study period was from 1998 to 2002. Results: The average annual incidence rate of becoming a plaintiff for head-injury neurosurgical inpatients was 15 per million; for all neurosurgical inpatients 11.8 per million; and for birth patients 33.5 per million. The relative risk comparing head-injured neurosurgical inpatients against all neurosurgical inpatients was 1.27; whereas comparing head-injury neurosurgical inpatients against birth inpatients was 0.45, and comparing all neurosurgical inpatients against birth inpatients, 0.35. Conclusions: The findings of our population-based study indicate that for the inpatient populations, whether head-injury patients or not, neurosurgeons in Taiwan are facing a relatively lower rate of litigation in comparison with those treating birth patients. Nonetheless, head-injury patients still pose a major challenge in the ED, and misdiagnosis remains the major complaint of plaintiffs in subsequent litigations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSurgical Neurology
Volume66
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Jurisprudence
Taiwan
Craniocerebral Trauma
Inpatients
Epidemiologic Studies
Parturition
Population
Incidence
Diagnostic Errors
Epidemiology
Cohort Studies
Head

Keywords

  • Cohort study
  • Head injury
  • Incidence
  • Litigation
  • Medical malpractice
  • Relative risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{6ea84007def14695be650152ab609587,
title = "The risk of malpractice litigation in care to head-injury patients in comparison with other high-risk patient groups: an inpatient-based epidemiological study in Taiwan",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of being sued in district courts for care for head-injury patients from the perspective of epidemiology. Methods: This research was designed to be a retrospective population-based cohort study. We researched the incidences of litigations arising from head-injury inpatients under neurosurgical care, all neurosurgical inpatients, and birth inpatients in Taiwan, and computed their relative risks. The study period was from 1998 to 2002. Results: The average annual incidence rate of becoming a plaintiff for head-injury neurosurgical inpatients was 15 per million; for all neurosurgical inpatients 11.8 per million; and for birth patients 33.5 per million. The relative risk comparing head-injured neurosurgical inpatients against all neurosurgical inpatients was 1.27; whereas comparing head-injury neurosurgical inpatients against birth inpatients was 0.45, and comparing all neurosurgical inpatients against birth inpatients, 0.35. Conclusions: The findings of our population-based study indicate that for the inpatient populations, whether head-injury patients or not, neurosurgeons in Taiwan are facing a relatively lower rate of litigation in comparison with those treating birth patients. Nonetheless, head-injury patients still pose a major challenge in the ED, and misdiagnosis remains the major complaint of plaintiffs in subsequent litigations.",
keywords = "Cohort study, Head injury, Incidence, Litigation, Medical malpractice, Relative risk",
author = "Yang, {Che Ming} and Chiu, {Wen Ta}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.surneu.2006.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The risk of malpractice litigation in care to head-injury patients in comparison with other high-risk patient groups

T2 - an inpatient-based epidemiological study in Taiwan

AU - Yang, Che Ming

AU - Chiu, Wen Ta

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of being sued in district courts for care for head-injury patients from the perspective of epidemiology. Methods: This research was designed to be a retrospective population-based cohort study. We researched the incidences of litigations arising from head-injury inpatients under neurosurgical care, all neurosurgical inpatients, and birth inpatients in Taiwan, and computed their relative risks. The study period was from 1998 to 2002. Results: The average annual incidence rate of becoming a plaintiff for head-injury neurosurgical inpatients was 15 per million; for all neurosurgical inpatients 11.8 per million; and for birth patients 33.5 per million. The relative risk comparing head-injured neurosurgical inpatients against all neurosurgical inpatients was 1.27; whereas comparing head-injury neurosurgical inpatients against birth inpatients was 0.45, and comparing all neurosurgical inpatients against birth inpatients, 0.35. Conclusions: The findings of our population-based study indicate that for the inpatient populations, whether head-injury patients or not, neurosurgeons in Taiwan are facing a relatively lower rate of litigation in comparison with those treating birth patients. Nonetheless, head-injury patients still pose a major challenge in the ED, and misdiagnosis remains the major complaint of plaintiffs in subsequent litigations.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of being sued in district courts for care for head-injury patients from the perspective of epidemiology. Methods: This research was designed to be a retrospective population-based cohort study. We researched the incidences of litigations arising from head-injury inpatients under neurosurgical care, all neurosurgical inpatients, and birth inpatients in Taiwan, and computed their relative risks. The study period was from 1998 to 2002. Results: The average annual incidence rate of becoming a plaintiff for head-injury neurosurgical inpatients was 15 per million; for all neurosurgical inpatients 11.8 per million; and for birth patients 33.5 per million. The relative risk comparing head-injured neurosurgical inpatients against all neurosurgical inpatients was 1.27; whereas comparing head-injury neurosurgical inpatients against birth inpatients was 0.45, and comparing all neurosurgical inpatients against birth inpatients, 0.35. Conclusions: The findings of our population-based study indicate that for the inpatient populations, whether head-injury patients or not, neurosurgeons in Taiwan are facing a relatively lower rate of litigation in comparison with those treating birth patients. Nonetheless, head-injury patients still pose a major challenge in the ED, and misdiagnosis remains the major complaint of plaintiffs in subsequent litigations.

KW - Cohort study

KW - Head injury

KW - Incidence

KW - Litigation

KW - Medical malpractice

KW - Relative risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750334622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750334622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.07.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17071255

AN - SCOPUS:33750334622

VL - 66

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - SUPPL. 2

ER -