The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the caregiver burden inventory

Kuei Ru Chou, Lin Jiann-Chyun, Hsin Chu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The assessment of burden has become a challenging task for most researchers because cultural, ethical, religious, and other personal values may influence perceptions of the meaning and consequences of burden. The lack of examination of the psychometric properties of the burden measures across studies limits the scientific rigor for generating additional research into "burden." Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory for its utility in clinical and research practice. Method: The first investigation evaluated the consistency between the Chinese and English versions of the Caregiver Burden Inventory. The second investigation established the internal consistent reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. Results: A paired t-test and intra-class correlation indicated that the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory was a very good reflection of the English version and demonstrated item equivalence. It also showed adequate internal consistency reliability, appropriate content validity, and concurrent validity. Factor analysis revealed moderate intercorrelations between subscales and high factor loadings also helped to clarify the psychometric meaning. Discussion: The reliability and validity information presented in this paper support using the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory as a research instrument in measuring the caregiver burden in the Chinese population. Further study is needed to discriminate the developmental, emotional, and social burden constructs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)324-331
Number of pages8
JournalNursing Research
Volume51
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Caregivers
Equipment and Supplies
Psychometrics
Research
Statistical Factor Analysis
Research Personnel
Population

Keywords

  • Caregiver burden
  • Factor analysis
  • Psychometric properties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the caregiver burden inventory. / Chou, Kuei Ru; Jiann-Chyun, Lin; Chu, Hsin.

In: Nursing Research, Vol. 51, No. 5, 09.2002, p. 324-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chou, Kuei Ru ; Jiann-Chyun, Lin ; Chu, Hsin. / The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the caregiver burden inventory. In: Nursing Research. 2002 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 324-331.
@article{a707b2cd38b34e5d9b1b58db4e571a66,
title = "The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the caregiver burden inventory",
abstract = "Background: The assessment of burden has become a challenging task for most researchers because cultural, ethical, religious, and other personal values may influence perceptions of the meaning and consequences of burden. The lack of examination of the psychometric properties of the burden measures across studies limits the scientific rigor for generating additional research into {"}burden.{"} Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory for its utility in clinical and research practice. Method: The first investigation evaluated the consistency between the Chinese and English versions of the Caregiver Burden Inventory. The second investigation established the internal consistent reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. Results: A paired t-test and intra-class correlation indicated that the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory was a very good reflection of the English version and demonstrated item equivalence. It also showed adequate internal consistency reliability, appropriate content validity, and concurrent validity. Factor analysis revealed moderate intercorrelations between subscales and high factor loadings also helped to clarify the psychometric meaning. Discussion: The reliability and validity information presented in this paper support using the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory as a research instrument in measuring the caregiver burden in the Chinese population. Further study is needed to discriminate the developmental, emotional, and social burden constructs.",
keywords = "Caregiver burden, Factor analysis, Psychometric properties",
author = "Chou, {Kuei Ru} and Lin Jiann-Chyun and Hsin Chu",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "324--331",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the caregiver burden inventory

AU - Chou, Kuei Ru

AU - Jiann-Chyun, Lin

AU - Chu, Hsin

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - Background: The assessment of burden has become a challenging task for most researchers because cultural, ethical, religious, and other personal values may influence perceptions of the meaning and consequences of burden. The lack of examination of the psychometric properties of the burden measures across studies limits the scientific rigor for generating additional research into "burden." Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory for its utility in clinical and research practice. Method: The first investigation evaluated the consistency between the Chinese and English versions of the Caregiver Burden Inventory. The second investigation established the internal consistent reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. Results: A paired t-test and intra-class correlation indicated that the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory was a very good reflection of the English version and demonstrated item equivalence. It also showed adequate internal consistency reliability, appropriate content validity, and concurrent validity. Factor analysis revealed moderate intercorrelations between subscales and high factor loadings also helped to clarify the psychometric meaning. Discussion: The reliability and validity information presented in this paper support using the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory as a research instrument in measuring the caregiver burden in the Chinese population. Further study is needed to discriminate the developmental, emotional, and social burden constructs.

AB - Background: The assessment of burden has become a challenging task for most researchers because cultural, ethical, religious, and other personal values may influence perceptions of the meaning and consequences of burden. The lack of examination of the psychometric properties of the burden measures across studies limits the scientific rigor for generating additional research into "burden." Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory for its utility in clinical and research practice. Method: The first investigation evaluated the consistency between the Chinese and English versions of the Caregiver Burden Inventory. The second investigation established the internal consistent reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. Results: A paired t-test and intra-class correlation indicated that the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory was a very good reflection of the English version and demonstrated item equivalence. It also showed adequate internal consistency reliability, appropriate content validity, and concurrent validity. Factor analysis revealed moderate intercorrelations between subscales and high factor loadings also helped to clarify the psychometric meaning. Discussion: The reliability and validity information presented in this paper support using the Chinese version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory as a research instrument in measuring the caregiver burden in the Chinese population. Further study is needed to discriminate the developmental, emotional, and social burden constructs.

KW - Caregiver burden

KW - Factor analysis

KW - Psychometric properties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036728656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036728656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 324

EP - 331

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 5

ER -