The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading

Chin An Wang, Albrecht W. Inhoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reingold and Rayner (2006) showed that the visual contrast of a fixated target word influenced its viewing duration, but not the viewing of the next (posttarget) word in the text that was shown in regular contrast. Configurational target changes, by contrast, influenced target and posttarget viewing. The current study examined whether this effect pattern can be attributed to differential processing of the posttarget word during target viewing. A boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) was used to provide an informative or uninformative posttarget preview and to reveal the word when it was fixated. Consistent with the earlier study, more time was spent viewing the target when its visual contrast was low and its configuration unfamiliar. Critically, target contrast had no effect on the acquisition of useful information from a posttarget preview, but an unfamiliar target configuration diminished the usefulness of an informative posttarget preview. These findings are consistent with Reingold and Rayner's (2006) claim that saccade programming and attention shifting during reading can be controlled by functionally distinct word recognition processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)805-817
Number of pages13
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Word Processing
Saccades
Reading

Keywords

  • E-Z reader model
  • Eye movements
  • Parafoveal preview effects
  • Reading
  • Word recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading. / Wang, Chin An; Inhoff, Albrecht W.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 805-817.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50634e3c75d14da3be6cd612f4fe79aa,
title = "The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading",
abstract = "Reingold and Rayner (2006) showed that the visual contrast of a fixated target word influenced its viewing duration, but not the viewing of the next (posttarget) word in the text that was shown in regular contrast. Configurational target changes, by contrast, influenced target and posttarget viewing. The current study examined whether this effect pattern can be attributed to differential processing of the posttarget word during target viewing. A boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) was used to provide an informative or uninformative posttarget preview and to reveal the word when it was fixated. Consistent with the earlier study, more time was spent viewing the target when its visual contrast was low and its configuration unfamiliar. Critically, target contrast had no effect on the acquisition of useful information from a posttarget preview, but an unfamiliar target configuration diminished the usefulness of an informative posttarget preview. These findings are consistent with Reingold and Rayner's (2006) claim that saccade programming and attention shifting during reading can be controlled by functionally distinct word recognition processes.",
keywords = "E-Z reader model, Eye movements, Parafoveal preview effects, Reading, Word recognition",
author = "Wang, {Chin An} and Inhoff, {Albrecht W.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17470210903147494",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "805--817",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading

AU - Wang, Chin An

AU - Inhoff, Albrecht W.

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Reingold and Rayner (2006) showed that the visual contrast of a fixated target word influenced its viewing duration, but not the viewing of the next (posttarget) word in the text that was shown in regular contrast. Configurational target changes, by contrast, influenced target and posttarget viewing. The current study examined whether this effect pattern can be attributed to differential processing of the posttarget word during target viewing. A boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) was used to provide an informative or uninformative posttarget preview and to reveal the word when it was fixated. Consistent with the earlier study, more time was spent viewing the target when its visual contrast was low and its configuration unfamiliar. Critically, target contrast had no effect on the acquisition of useful information from a posttarget preview, but an unfamiliar target configuration diminished the usefulness of an informative posttarget preview. These findings are consistent with Reingold and Rayner's (2006) claim that saccade programming and attention shifting during reading can be controlled by functionally distinct word recognition processes.

AB - Reingold and Rayner (2006) showed that the visual contrast of a fixated target word influenced its viewing duration, but not the viewing of the next (posttarget) word in the text that was shown in regular contrast. Configurational target changes, by contrast, influenced target and posttarget viewing. The current study examined whether this effect pattern can be attributed to differential processing of the posttarget word during target viewing. A boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) was used to provide an informative or uninformative posttarget preview and to reveal the word when it was fixated. Consistent with the earlier study, more time was spent viewing the target when its visual contrast was low and its configuration unfamiliar. Critically, target contrast had no effect on the acquisition of useful information from a posttarget preview, but an unfamiliar target configuration diminished the usefulness of an informative posttarget preview. These findings are consistent with Reingold and Rayner's (2006) claim that saccade programming and attention shifting during reading can be controlled by functionally distinct word recognition processes.

KW - E-Z reader model

KW - Eye movements

KW - Parafoveal preview effects

KW - Reading

KW - Word recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949563811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949563811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17470210903147494

DO - 10.1080/17470210903147494

M3 - Article

C2 - 19742385

AN - SCOPUS:77949563811

VL - 63

SP - 805

EP - 817

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 4

ER -