不完全修復在一天多次照射時之重要性

Translated title of the contribution: The Importance of Incomplete Repair in Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Importance of incomplete Repair in Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy Lai-Lei Ting Department of Radiation Oncology National Taiwan University Hospital Theoretically, hyperfractionated radiotherapy can greatly spare late-responding tissues. However, the interval time which allows sublethal damage to be repaired is critical. The repair half-life is longer for lateresponding tissues as comparison with that of early-responding tissues. Besides, the larger the dose, the repair time would much prolong. In 1985, Thames proposed incomplete-repair model which insinuated that even the fraction size is very small, the total dose could not be highly escalated. By experiments and clinical trials, the best interval time is at least 6 to 8 hours. Otherwise, since there is incomplete-repair existed, the late complications will be grim.
Original languageTraditional Chinese
Pages (from-to)63-66
Number of pages4
Journal放射治療與腫瘤學
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Tolnaftate
Radiation Oncology
Taiwan
Half-Life
Clinical Trials

Cite this

不完全修復在一天多次照射時之重要性. / 丁禮莉.

In: 放射治療與腫瘤學, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1994, p. 63-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f397b6bf2ed54ebba62b0addd5263e71,
title = "不完全修復在一天多次照射時之重要性",
abstract = "The Importance of incomplete Repair in Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy Lai-Lei Ting Department of Radiation Oncology National Taiwan University Hospital Theoretically, hyperfractionated radiotherapy can greatly spare late-responding tissues. However, the interval time which allows sublethal damage to be repaired is critical. The repair half-life is longer for lateresponding tissues as comparison with that of early-responding tissues. Besides, the larger the dose, the repair time would much prolong. In 1985, Thames proposed incomplete-repair model which insinuated that even the fraction size is very small, the total dose could not be highly escalated. By experiments and clinical trials, the best interval time is at least 6 to 8 hours. Otherwise, since there is incomplete-repair existed, the late complications will be grim.",
author = "丁禮莉",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.6316/TRO/199401(1)63",
language = "繁體中文",
volume = "1",
pages = "63--66",
journal = "放射治療與腫瘤學",
issn = "1023-988x",
publisher = "台灣放射腫瘤學會",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 不完全修復在一天多次照射時之重要性

AU - 丁禮莉, null

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The Importance of incomplete Repair in Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy Lai-Lei Ting Department of Radiation Oncology National Taiwan University Hospital Theoretically, hyperfractionated radiotherapy can greatly spare late-responding tissues. However, the interval time which allows sublethal damage to be repaired is critical. The repair half-life is longer for lateresponding tissues as comparison with that of early-responding tissues. Besides, the larger the dose, the repair time would much prolong. In 1985, Thames proposed incomplete-repair model which insinuated that even the fraction size is very small, the total dose could not be highly escalated. By experiments and clinical trials, the best interval time is at least 6 to 8 hours. Otherwise, since there is incomplete-repair existed, the late complications will be grim.

AB - The Importance of incomplete Repair in Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy Lai-Lei Ting Department of Radiation Oncology National Taiwan University Hospital Theoretically, hyperfractionated radiotherapy can greatly spare late-responding tissues. However, the interval time which allows sublethal damage to be repaired is critical. The repair half-life is longer for lateresponding tissues as comparison with that of early-responding tissues. Besides, the larger the dose, the repair time would much prolong. In 1985, Thames proposed incomplete-repair model which insinuated that even the fraction size is very small, the total dose could not be highly escalated. By experiments and clinical trials, the best interval time is at least 6 to 8 hours. Otherwise, since there is incomplete-repair existed, the late complications will be grim.

UR - http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=1023988x-199403-1-1-63-66-a

U2 - 10.6316/TRO/199401(1)63

DO - 10.6316/TRO/199401(1)63

M3 - 文章

VL - 1

SP - 63

EP - 66

JO - 放射治療與腫瘤學

JF - 放射治療與腫瘤學

SN - 1023-988x

IS - 1

ER -