The feasibility of full computerization in the ED

Sheng Chuan Hu, D. H T Yen, Wei Fong Kao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For understanding the feasibility of full computerization of an emergency department (ED), we investigated the completion rate performed by doctors, nurses, or registration clerks since the implementation of full computerization in our ED. We evaluated the changing style of chart-recording, from hand-writing pattern to full computer recording, by recording the execution rate of different information keyed by doctors, nurses, or registration clerks according to their work in ED. We recorded and analyzed different monthly reports of the execution rate in the 18-month period of study. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. The average monthly census was 4570.1 ± 580.7 (95% confidence interval [Cl] for mean: 4281.3, 4858.9). The average execution rate for mode of arrival and triage classification were 97.1 ± 4.1% (95% Cl for mean: 95.1%, 99.1%) and 97.2 ± 4.1% (95% Cl for mean: 95.2%, 99.2%), respectively. In comparison with the execution rate for disposition status between the period of the first 10 months (keying data by nurses) and the late 8 months (keying data by clerks), it showed 72.0 ± 33.2% v 96.7 ± 2.0%; 66.7 ± 35.0% v 95.8 ± 1.9%; 57.5 ± 32.0% v 88.2 ± 8.2% in nontrauma, trauma and pediatric section, respectively, with statistic significance (P <.01). To compare the rate of execution performed by physicians, we divided the study period into 3 phases (phase 1: first 6 months, phase 2: 7-12 months, phase 3: 13-18 months of the study period). The results were statistically significant (P = .004) in phase 3 (83.4 ± 5.3%) with higher execution rate than phase 1 (69.7 ± 7.7%) and phase 2 (75.2 ± 4.9%) in trauma physician. In the pediatric section, it was also significantly higher in phase 3 than phase 2 (88.2 ± 7.7% v 70.7 ± 5.9%, P = .012). We concluded that it is efficient to key in data by registration clerks instead of nurses, and it takes time to persuade and educate most physicians to cooperate in using the computer while seeing patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-121
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Nurses
Nonparametric Statistics
Physicians
Pediatrics
Triage
Wounds and Injuries
Censuses
Analysis of Variance
Hand
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Computerization
  • Emergency department

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The feasibility of full computerization in the ED. / Hu, Sheng Chuan; Yen, D. H T; Kao, Wei Fong.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2002, p. 118-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hu, Sheng Chuan ; Yen, D. H T ; Kao, Wei Fong. / The feasibility of full computerization in the ED. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 118-121.
@article{28d6b3e5a6f14685864369866d0d4c3f,
title = "The feasibility of full computerization in the ED",
abstract = "For understanding the feasibility of full computerization of an emergency department (ED), we investigated the completion rate performed by doctors, nurses, or registration clerks since the implementation of full computerization in our ED. We evaluated the changing style of chart-recording, from hand-writing pattern to full computer recording, by recording the execution rate of different information keyed by doctors, nurses, or registration clerks according to their work in ED. We recorded and analyzed different monthly reports of the execution rate in the 18-month period of study. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. The average monthly census was 4570.1 ± 580.7 (95{\%} confidence interval [Cl] for mean: 4281.3, 4858.9). The average execution rate for mode of arrival and triage classification were 97.1 ± 4.1{\%} (95{\%} Cl for mean: 95.1{\%}, 99.1{\%}) and 97.2 ± 4.1{\%} (95{\%} Cl for mean: 95.2{\%}, 99.2{\%}), respectively. In comparison with the execution rate for disposition status between the period of the first 10 months (keying data by nurses) and the late 8 months (keying data by clerks), it showed 72.0 ± 33.2{\%} v 96.7 ± 2.0{\%}; 66.7 ± 35.0{\%} v 95.8 ± 1.9{\%}; 57.5 ± 32.0{\%} v 88.2 ± 8.2{\%} in nontrauma, trauma and pediatric section, respectively, with statistic significance (P <.01). To compare the rate of execution performed by physicians, we divided the study period into 3 phases (phase 1: first 6 months, phase 2: 7-12 months, phase 3: 13-18 months of the study period). The results were statistically significant (P = .004) in phase 3 (83.4 ± 5.3{\%}) with higher execution rate than phase 1 (69.7 ± 7.7{\%}) and phase 2 (75.2 ± 4.9{\%}) in trauma physician. In the pediatric section, it was also significantly higher in phase 3 than phase 2 (88.2 ± 7.7{\%} v 70.7 ± 5.9{\%}, P = .012). We concluded that it is efficient to key in data by registration clerks instead of nurses, and it takes time to persuade and educate most physicians to cooperate in using the computer while seeing patients.",
keywords = "Computerization, Emergency department",
author = "Hu, {Sheng Chuan} and Yen, {D. H T} and Kao, {Wei Fong}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1053/ajem.2002.31574",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "118--121",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The feasibility of full computerization in the ED

AU - Hu, Sheng Chuan

AU - Yen, D. H T

AU - Kao, Wei Fong

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - For understanding the feasibility of full computerization of an emergency department (ED), we investigated the completion rate performed by doctors, nurses, or registration clerks since the implementation of full computerization in our ED. We evaluated the changing style of chart-recording, from hand-writing pattern to full computer recording, by recording the execution rate of different information keyed by doctors, nurses, or registration clerks according to their work in ED. We recorded and analyzed different monthly reports of the execution rate in the 18-month period of study. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. The average monthly census was 4570.1 ± 580.7 (95% confidence interval [Cl] for mean: 4281.3, 4858.9). The average execution rate for mode of arrival and triage classification were 97.1 ± 4.1% (95% Cl for mean: 95.1%, 99.1%) and 97.2 ± 4.1% (95% Cl for mean: 95.2%, 99.2%), respectively. In comparison with the execution rate for disposition status between the period of the first 10 months (keying data by nurses) and the late 8 months (keying data by clerks), it showed 72.0 ± 33.2% v 96.7 ± 2.0%; 66.7 ± 35.0% v 95.8 ± 1.9%; 57.5 ± 32.0% v 88.2 ± 8.2% in nontrauma, trauma and pediatric section, respectively, with statistic significance (P <.01). To compare the rate of execution performed by physicians, we divided the study period into 3 phases (phase 1: first 6 months, phase 2: 7-12 months, phase 3: 13-18 months of the study period). The results were statistically significant (P = .004) in phase 3 (83.4 ± 5.3%) with higher execution rate than phase 1 (69.7 ± 7.7%) and phase 2 (75.2 ± 4.9%) in trauma physician. In the pediatric section, it was also significantly higher in phase 3 than phase 2 (88.2 ± 7.7% v 70.7 ± 5.9%, P = .012). We concluded that it is efficient to key in data by registration clerks instead of nurses, and it takes time to persuade and educate most physicians to cooperate in using the computer while seeing patients.

AB - For understanding the feasibility of full computerization of an emergency department (ED), we investigated the completion rate performed by doctors, nurses, or registration clerks since the implementation of full computerization in our ED. We evaluated the changing style of chart-recording, from hand-writing pattern to full computer recording, by recording the execution rate of different information keyed by doctors, nurses, or registration clerks according to their work in ED. We recorded and analyzed different monthly reports of the execution rate in the 18-month period of study. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. The average monthly census was 4570.1 ± 580.7 (95% confidence interval [Cl] for mean: 4281.3, 4858.9). The average execution rate for mode of arrival and triage classification were 97.1 ± 4.1% (95% Cl for mean: 95.1%, 99.1%) and 97.2 ± 4.1% (95% Cl for mean: 95.2%, 99.2%), respectively. In comparison with the execution rate for disposition status between the period of the first 10 months (keying data by nurses) and the late 8 months (keying data by clerks), it showed 72.0 ± 33.2% v 96.7 ± 2.0%; 66.7 ± 35.0% v 95.8 ± 1.9%; 57.5 ± 32.0% v 88.2 ± 8.2% in nontrauma, trauma and pediatric section, respectively, with statistic significance (P <.01). To compare the rate of execution performed by physicians, we divided the study period into 3 phases (phase 1: first 6 months, phase 2: 7-12 months, phase 3: 13-18 months of the study period). The results were statistically significant (P = .004) in phase 3 (83.4 ± 5.3%) with higher execution rate than phase 1 (69.7 ± 7.7%) and phase 2 (75.2 ± 4.9%) in trauma physician. In the pediatric section, it was also significantly higher in phase 3 than phase 2 (88.2 ± 7.7% v 70.7 ± 5.9%, P = .012). We concluded that it is efficient to key in data by registration clerks instead of nurses, and it takes time to persuade and educate most physicians to cooperate in using the computer while seeing patients.

KW - Computerization

KW - Emergency department

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036198098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036198098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/ajem.2002.31574

DO - 10.1053/ajem.2002.31574

M3 - Article

C2 - 11880878

AN - SCOPUS:0036198098

VL - 20

SP - 118

EP - 121

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 2

ER -