10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electromyographic (EMG) signals are usually acquired using surface electrodes, and they commonly serve as the control sources of myoelectric prosthetic limbs. The use of passive electrodes and amplifiers with adjustable gain is very popular in laboratories for the development of new control strategies. However, active electrodes without conductive jelly are used in most clinical applications of myoelectric hand control. There remains an important question: Are there any differences between using active and passive electrodes in EMG pattern classifications? Autoregressive and cepstral coefficients were used to evaluate recognition rates via both types of electrodes. The results showed that the estimated recognition rates in the passive electrodes were comparable to those in the active ones (averaged recognition rate, 88.5 vs. 85.84% in the autoregressive coefficients, and 84.84 vs. 83.5%, in the cepstral coefficients, respectively). Aside from the lack of significant statistical differences between them, the results imply that the differences between the recognition rates via these electrodes could be negligible. This would be helpful for the myoelectric control of assistive devices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605-610
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Engineering and Physics
Volume26
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

Pattern recognition
Electrodes
Self-Help Devices
Prosthetics
Extremities
Hand

Keywords

  • Active electrode
  • EMG
  • Passive electrode
  • Pattern classification
  • Surface myoelectric signal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The comparison of electromyographic pattern classifications with active and passive electrodes. / Chiou, Ying Han; Luh, Jer Junn; Chen, Shih Ching; Lai, Jin Shin; Kuo, Te Son.

In: Medical Engineering and Physics, Vol. 26, No. 7, 09.2004, p. 605-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chiou, Ying Han ; Luh, Jer Junn ; Chen, Shih Ching ; Lai, Jin Shin ; Kuo, Te Son. / The comparison of electromyographic pattern classifications with active and passive electrodes. In: Medical Engineering and Physics. 2004 ; Vol. 26, No. 7. pp. 605-610.
@article{0f2ed259be344b678fb17967aef33c5d,
title = "The comparison of electromyographic pattern classifications with active and passive electrodes",
abstract = "Electromyographic (EMG) signals are usually acquired using surface electrodes, and they commonly serve as the control sources of myoelectric prosthetic limbs. The use of passive electrodes and amplifiers with adjustable gain is very popular in laboratories for the development of new control strategies. However, active electrodes without conductive jelly are used in most clinical applications of myoelectric hand control. There remains an important question: Are there any differences between using active and passive electrodes in EMG pattern classifications? Autoregressive and cepstral coefficients were used to evaluate recognition rates via both types of electrodes. The results showed that the estimated recognition rates in the passive electrodes were comparable to those in the active ones (averaged recognition rate, 88.5 vs. 85.84{\%} in the autoregressive coefficients, and 84.84 vs. 83.5{\%}, in the cepstral coefficients, respectively). Aside from the lack of significant statistical differences between them, the results imply that the differences between the recognition rates via these electrodes could be negligible. This would be helpful for the myoelectric control of assistive devices.",
keywords = "Active electrode, EMG, Passive electrode, Pattern classification, Surface myoelectric signal",
author = "Chiou, {Ying Han} and Luh, {Jer Junn} and Chen, {Shih Ching} and Lai, {Jin Shin} and Kuo, {Te Son}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.04.001",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "605--610",
journal = "Medical Engineering and Physics",
issn = "1350-4533",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The comparison of electromyographic pattern classifications with active and passive electrodes

AU - Chiou, Ying Han

AU - Luh, Jer Junn

AU - Chen, Shih Ching

AU - Lai, Jin Shin

AU - Kuo, Te Son

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Electromyographic (EMG) signals are usually acquired using surface electrodes, and they commonly serve as the control sources of myoelectric prosthetic limbs. The use of passive electrodes and amplifiers with adjustable gain is very popular in laboratories for the development of new control strategies. However, active electrodes without conductive jelly are used in most clinical applications of myoelectric hand control. There remains an important question: Are there any differences between using active and passive electrodes in EMG pattern classifications? Autoregressive and cepstral coefficients were used to evaluate recognition rates via both types of electrodes. The results showed that the estimated recognition rates in the passive electrodes were comparable to those in the active ones (averaged recognition rate, 88.5 vs. 85.84% in the autoregressive coefficients, and 84.84 vs. 83.5%, in the cepstral coefficients, respectively). Aside from the lack of significant statistical differences between them, the results imply that the differences between the recognition rates via these electrodes could be negligible. This would be helpful for the myoelectric control of assistive devices.

AB - Electromyographic (EMG) signals are usually acquired using surface electrodes, and they commonly serve as the control sources of myoelectric prosthetic limbs. The use of passive electrodes and amplifiers with adjustable gain is very popular in laboratories for the development of new control strategies. However, active electrodes without conductive jelly are used in most clinical applications of myoelectric hand control. There remains an important question: Are there any differences between using active and passive electrodes in EMG pattern classifications? Autoregressive and cepstral coefficients were used to evaluate recognition rates via both types of electrodes. The results showed that the estimated recognition rates in the passive electrodes were comparable to those in the active ones (averaged recognition rate, 88.5 vs. 85.84% in the autoregressive coefficients, and 84.84 vs. 83.5%, in the cepstral coefficients, respectively). Aside from the lack of significant statistical differences between them, the results imply that the differences between the recognition rates via these electrodes could be negligible. This would be helpful for the myoelectric control of assistive devices.

KW - Active electrode

KW - EMG

KW - Passive electrode

KW - Pattern classification

KW - Surface myoelectric signal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242684380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242684380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.04.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 15271288

AN - SCOPUS:3242684380

VL - 26

SP - 605

EP - 610

JO - Medical Engineering and Physics

JF - Medical Engineering and Physics

SN - 1350-4533

IS - 7

ER -