The comparison of early fluid therapy in extensive flame burns between inhalation and noninhalation injuries

Niann Tzyy Dai, Tim Mo Chen, Tian Yeu Cheng, Shou Liang Chen, Shyi Gen Chen, Giuen Hsueng Chou, Trong Duo Chou, Hsian-Jenn Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last half century, advances in treatment have changed the principal cause of death in burn patients from burn shock and wound sepsis to pulmonary sepsis, of which inhalation injury has always played a key role in morbidity and mortality. Even though Navar et al. have noted that patients with inhalation injury had a mean fluid requirement of 5.8 ml/kg/% burn to achieve resuscitation from early burn shock, while patients without inhalation injury required only a mean fluid of 4.0 ml/kg/% burn, to achieve successful resuscitation in inhalation injured patients with minimum but adequate fluid has always been a challenge. To further define the difference of early fluid therapy between inhalation and noninhalation in extensively burned patients, a retrospective analysis was carried out in the Tri-Service General Hospital. Sixty-two flame burned patients (aged from 16 to 81 years-old with a mean age of 33.2 ± 15.1 years; with burn size ranging from 30% to 98% TBSA with a mean burn size of 60.5 ± 22.7%; 26 with inhalation injury; noninhalation 36) were reviewed during a 5-year period. The Parkland formula is the initial choice of fluid regimen with 4 ml/kg/% burn and the amount of replacement is monitored by urine output and is titrated to maintain urine output between 0.5 and 1.0 ml/kg/h. The mean amounts of fluid requirements of both inhalation and noninhalation burned patients were 3.1 ± 1.0 and 2.3 ± 0.8 ml/kg/% burn respectively (p < 0.05). Our study showed less fluid requirement for both inhalation and noninhalation injured patients in comparison with the Navar study and Parkland predictions in the first 24 h postburn. Furthermore, the inhalation injured patients definitely required volumes of fluid in excess of those required in noninhalation injured cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)671-675
Number of pages5
JournalBurns
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Inhalation Burns
Fluid Therapy
Secondary Prevention
Inhalation
Wounds and Injuries
Resuscitation
Shock
Sepsis
Urine
General Hospitals
Cause of Death

Keywords

  • Flame burn
  • Fluid therapy
  • Inhalation injury
  • Noninhalation injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

The comparison of early fluid therapy in extensive flame burns between inhalation and noninhalation injuries. / Dai, Niann Tzyy; Chen, Tim Mo; Cheng, Tian Yeu; Chen, Shou Liang; Chen, Shyi Gen; Chou, Giuen Hsueng; Chou, Trong Duo; Wang, Hsian-Jenn.

In: Burns, Vol. 24, No. 7, 01.11.1998, p. 671-675.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dai, Niann Tzyy ; Chen, Tim Mo ; Cheng, Tian Yeu ; Chen, Shou Liang ; Chen, Shyi Gen ; Chou, Giuen Hsueng ; Chou, Trong Duo ; Wang, Hsian-Jenn. / The comparison of early fluid therapy in extensive flame burns between inhalation and noninhalation injuries. In: Burns. 1998 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 671-675.
@article{2ed4fa02da6445d7871f29779185a641,
title = "The comparison of early fluid therapy in extensive flame burns between inhalation and noninhalation injuries",
abstract = "Over the last half century, advances in treatment have changed the principal cause of death in burn patients from burn shock and wound sepsis to pulmonary sepsis, of which inhalation injury has always played a key role in morbidity and mortality. Even though Navar et al. have noted that patients with inhalation injury had a mean fluid requirement of 5.8 ml/kg/{\%} burn to achieve resuscitation from early burn shock, while patients without inhalation injury required only a mean fluid of 4.0 ml/kg/{\%} burn, to achieve successful resuscitation in inhalation injured patients with minimum but adequate fluid has always been a challenge. To further define the difference of early fluid therapy between inhalation and noninhalation in extensively burned patients, a retrospective analysis was carried out in the Tri-Service General Hospital. Sixty-two flame burned patients (aged from 16 to 81 years-old with a mean age of 33.2 ± 15.1 years; with burn size ranging from 30{\%} to 98{\%} TBSA with a mean burn size of 60.5 ± 22.7{\%}; 26 with inhalation injury; noninhalation 36) were reviewed during a 5-year period. The Parkland formula is the initial choice of fluid regimen with 4 ml/kg/{\%} burn and the amount of replacement is monitored by urine output and is titrated to maintain urine output between 0.5 and 1.0 ml/kg/h. The mean amounts of fluid requirements of both inhalation and noninhalation burned patients were 3.1 ± 1.0 and 2.3 ± 0.8 ml/kg/{\%} burn respectively (p < 0.05). Our study showed less fluid requirement for both inhalation and noninhalation injured patients in comparison with the Navar study and Parkland predictions in the first 24 h postburn. Furthermore, the inhalation injured patients definitely required volumes of fluid in excess of those required in noninhalation injured cases.",
keywords = "Flame burn, Fluid therapy, Inhalation injury, Noninhalation injury",
author = "Dai, {Niann Tzyy} and Chen, {Tim Mo} and Cheng, {Tian Yeu} and Chen, {Shou Liang} and Chen, {Shyi Gen} and Chou, {Giuen Hsueng} and Chou, {Trong Duo} and Hsian-Jenn Wang",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00092-8",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "671--675",
journal = "Burns",
issn = "0305-4179",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The comparison of early fluid therapy in extensive flame burns between inhalation and noninhalation injuries

AU - Dai, Niann Tzyy

AU - Chen, Tim Mo

AU - Cheng, Tian Yeu

AU - Chen, Shou Liang

AU - Chen, Shyi Gen

AU - Chou, Giuen Hsueng

AU - Chou, Trong Duo

AU - Wang, Hsian-Jenn

PY - 1998/11/1

Y1 - 1998/11/1

N2 - Over the last half century, advances in treatment have changed the principal cause of death in burn patients from burn shock and wound sepsis to pulmonary sepsis, of which inhalation injury has always played a key role in morbidity and mortality. Even though Navar et al. have noted that patients with inhalation injury had a mean fluid requirement of 5.8 ml/kg/% burn to achieve resuscitation from early burn shock, while patients without inhalation injury required only a mean fluid of 4.0 ml/kg/% burn, to achieve successful resuscitation in inhalation injured patients with minimum but adequate fluid has always been a challenge. To further define the difference of early fluid therapy between inhalation and noninhalation in extensively burned patients, a retrospective analysis was carried out in the Tri-Service General Hospital. Sixty-two flame burned patients (aged from 16 to 81 years-old with a mean age of 33.2 ± 15.1 years; with burn size ranging from 30% to 98% TBSA with a mean burn size of 60.5 ± 22.7%; 26 with inhalation injury; noninhalation 36) were reviewed during a 5-year period. The Parkland formula is the initial choice of fluid regimen with 4 ml/kg/% burn and the amount of replacement is monitored by urine output and is titrated to maintain urine output between 0.5 and 1.0 ml/kg/h. The mean amounts of fluid requirements of both inhalation and noninhalation burned patients were 3.1 ± 1.0 and 2.3 ± 0.8 ml/kg/% burn respectively (p < 0.05). Our study showed less fluid requirement for both inhalation and noninhalation injured patients in comparison with the Navar study and Parkland predictions in the first 24 h postburn. Furthermore, the inhalation injured patients definitely required volumes of fluid in excess of those required in noninhalation injured cases.

AB - Over the last half century, advances in treatment have changed the principal cause of death in burn patients from burn shock and wound sepsis to pulmonary sepsis, of which inhalation injury has always played a key role in morbidity and mortality. Even though Navar et al. have noted that patients with inhalation injury had a mean fluid requirement of 5.8 ml/kg/% burn to achieve resuscitation from early burn shock, while patients without inhalation injury required only a mean fluid of 4.0 ml/kg/% burn, to achieve successful resuscitation in inhalation injured patients with minimum but adequate fluid has always been a challenge. To further define the difference of early fluid therapy between inhalation and noninhalation in extensively burned patients, a retrospective analysis was carried out in the Tri-Service General Hospital. Sixty-two flame burned patients (aged from 16 to 81 years-old with a mean age of 33.2 ± 15.1 years; with burn size ranging from 30% to 98% TBSA with a mean burn size of 60.5 ± 22.7%; 26 with inhalation injury; noninhalation 36) were reviewed during a 5-year period. The Parkland formula is the initial choice of fluid regimen with 4 ml/kg/% burn and the amount of replacement is monitored by urine output and is titrated to maintain urine output between 0.5 and 1.0 ml/kg/h. The mean amounts of fluid requirements of both inhalation and noninhalation burned patients were 3.1 ± 1.0 and 2.3 ± 0.8 ml/kg/% burn respectively (p < 0.05). Our study showed less fluid requirement for both inhalation and noninhalation injured patients in comparison with the Navar study and Parkland predictions in the first 24 h postburn. Furthermore, the inhalation injured patients definitely required volumes of fluid in excess of those required in noninhalation injured cases.

KW - Flame burn

KW - Fluid therapy

KW - Inhalation injury

KW - Noninhalation injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032215490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032215490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00092-8

DO - 10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00092-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 9882069

AN - SCOPUS:0032215490

VL - 24

SP - 671

EP - 675

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

SN - 0305-4179

IS - 7

ER -