Test–retest reliability of mismatch negativity (MMN) to emotional voices

Chenyi Chen, Chia Wen Chan, Yawei Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A voice from kin species conveys indispensable social and affective signals with uniquely phylogenetic and ontogenetic standpoints. However, the neural underpinning of emotional voices, beyond low-level acoustic features, activates a processing chain that proceeds from the auditory pathway to the brain structures implicated in cognition and emotion. By using a passive auditory oddball paradigm, which employs emotional voices, this study investigates the test–retest reliability of emotional mismatch negativity (MMN), indicating that the deviants of positively (happily)- and negatively (angrily)-spoken syllables, as compared to neutral standards, can trigger MMN as a response to an automatic discrimination of emotional salience. The neurophysiological estimates of MMN to positive and negative deviants appear to be highly reproducible, irrespective of the subject’s attentional disposition: whether the subjects are set to a condition that involves watching a silent movie or do a working memory task. Specifically, negativity bias is evinced as threatening, relative to positive vocalizations, consistently inducing larger MMN amplitudes, regardless of the day and the time of a day. The present findings provide evidence to support the fact that emotional MMN offers a stable platform to detect subtle changes in current emotional shifts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number453
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 15 2018

Fingerprint

Auditory Pathways
Motion Pictures
Short-Term Memory
Acoustics
Cognition
Emotions
Brain
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Attention disposition
  • Circadian sessions
  • Emotional voice
  • Mismatch negativity
  • Test–retest reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Test–retest reliability of mismatch negativity (MMN) to emotional voices. / Chen, Chenyi; Chan, Chia Wen; Cheng, Yawei.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 12, 453, 15.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d6c63fba7ea44f6aa66aaa5a130ae65,
title = "Test–retest reliability of mismatch negativity (MMN) to emotional voices",
abstract = "A voice from kin species conveys indispensable social and affective signals with uniquely phylogenetic and ontogenetic standpoints. However, the neural underpinning of emotional voices, beyond low-level acoustic features, activates a processing chain that proceeds from the auditory pathway to the brain structures implicated in cognition and emotion. By using a passive auditory oddball paradigm, which employs emotional voices, this study investigates the test–retest reliability of emotional mismatch negativity (MMN), indicating that the deviants of positively (happily)- and negatively (angrily)-spoken syllables, as compared to neutral standards, can trigger MMN as a response to an automatic discrimination of emotional salience. The neurophysiological estimates of MMN to positive and negative deviants appear to be highly reproducible, irrespective of the subject’s attentional disposition: whether the subjects are set to a condition that involves watching a silent movie or do a working memory task. Specifically, negativity bias is evinced as threatening, relative to positive vocalizations, consistently inducing larger MMN amplitudes, regardless of the day and the time of a day. The present findings provide evidence to support the fact that emotional MMN offers a stable platform to detect subtle changes in current emotional shifts.",
keywords = "Attention disposition, Circadian sessions, Emotional voice, Mismatch negativity, Test–retest reliability",
author = "Chenyi Chen and Chan, {Chia Wen} and Yawei Cheng",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2018.00453",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test–retest reliability of mismatch negativity (MMN) to emotional voices

AU - Chen, Chenyi

AU - Chan, Chia Wen

AU - Cheng, Yawei

PY - 2018/11/15

Y1 - 2018/11/15

N2 - A voice from kin species conveys indispensable social and affective signals with uniquely phylogenetic and ontogenetic standpoints. However, the neural underpinning of emotional voices, beyond low-level acoustic features, activates a processing chain that proceeds from the auditory pathway to the brain structures implicated in cognition and emotion. By using a passive auditory oddball paradigm, which employs emotional voices, this study investigates the test–retest reliability of emotional mismatch negativity (MMN), indicating that the deviants of positively (happily)- and negatively (angrily)-spoken syllables, as compared to neutral standards, can trigger MMN as a response to an automatic discrimination of emotional salience. The neurophysiological estimates of MMN to positive and negative deviants appear to be highly reproducible, irrespective of the subject’s attentional disposition: whether the subjects are set to a condition that involves watching a silent movie or do a working memory task. Specifically, negativity bias is evinced as threatening, relative to positive vocalizations, consistently inducing larger MMN amplitudes, regardless of the day and the time of a day. The present findings provide evidence to support the fact that emotional MMN offers a stable platform to detect subtle changes in current emotional shifts.

AB - A voice from kin species conveys indispensable social and affective signals with uniquely phylogenetic and ontogenetic standpoints. However, the neural underpinning of emotional voices, beyond low-level acoustic features, activates a processing chain that proceeds from the auditory pathway to the brain structures implicated in cognition and emotion. By using a passive auditory oddball paradigm, which employs emotional voices, this study investigates the test–retest reliability of emotional mismatch negativity (MMN), indicating that the deviants of positively (happily)- and negatively (angrily)-spoken syllables, as compared to neutral standards, can trigger MMN as a response to an automatic discrimination of emotional salience. The neurophysiological estimates of MMN to positive and negative deviants appear to be highly reproducible, irrespective of the subject’s attentional disposition: whether the subjects are set to a condition that involves watching a silent movie or do a working memory task. Specifically, negativity bias is evinced as threatening, relative to positive vocalizations, consistently inducing larger MMN amplitudes, regardless of the day and the time of a day. The present findings provide evidence to support the fact that emotional MMN offers a stable platform to detect subtle changes in current emotional shifts.

KW - Attention disposition

KW - Circadian sessions

KW - Emotional voice

KW - Mismatch negativity

KW - Test–retest reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056823352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056823352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00453

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00453

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

M1 - 453

ER -