Testicular sperm is superior to ejaculated sperm for ICSI in cryptozoospermia

An update systematic review and meta-analysis

Yi No Kang, Ya Wen Hsiao, Chien Yu Chen, Chien Chih Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is well established and provides patients with severely impaired sperm quality with an opportunity to father a child. However, previous studies do not clearly indicate whether male with cryptozoospermia should use testicular sperm or ejaculated sperm for ICSI. The newest systematic review of this topic also gave a controversial conclusion that was based on incorrect pooling result. Moreover, two clinical studies published after the systematic review. In the present update systematic review and meta-analysis, a comprehensive citation search for relevant studies was performed using the Cochrane library databases, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science up to September 2017. The search returned 313 records, in which six studies were included in quantitative synthesis. These studies involved 578 male infertility patients who had undergone 761 ICSI cycles. The risk ratios favour fresh testicular sperm for good quality embryo rate (1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30, P = 0.005), implantation rate (95% CI 1.02-2.26, P = 0.04), and pregnancy rate (RR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.20-2.52, P = 0.004). In conclusion, the existing evidence suggests that testicular sperm is better than ejaculated sperm for ICSI in male with cryptozoospermia.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7874
JournalScientific Reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injections
Meta-Analysis
Spermatozoa
Male Infertility
Pregnancy Rate
PubMed
MEDLINE
Fathers
Libraries
Embryonic Structures
Odds Ratio
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Testicular sperm is superior to ejaculated sperm for ICSI in cryptozoospermia : An update systematic review and meta-analysis. / Kang, Yi No; Hsiao, Ya Wen; Chen, Chien Yu; Wu, Chien Chih.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 7874, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{de797fefc70b4f82bc5dd486307ddc66,
title = "Testicular sperm is superior to ejaculated sperm for ICSI in cryptozoospermia: An update systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is well established and provides patients with severely impaired sperm quality with an opportunity to father a child. However, previous studies do not clearly indicate whether male with cryptozoospermia should use testicular sperm or ejaculated sperm for ICSI. The newest systematic review of this topic also gave a controversial conclusion that was based on incorrect pooling result. Moreover, two clinical studies published after the systematic review. In the present update systematic review and meta-analysis, a comprehensive citation search for relevant studies was performed using the Cochrane library databases, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science up to September 2017. The search returned 313 records, in which six studies were included in quantitative synthesis. These studies involved 578 male infertility patients who had undergone 761 ICSI cycles. The risk ratios favour fresh testicular sperm for good quality embryo rate (1.17, 95{\%} CI 1.05-1.30, P = 0.005), implantation rate (95{\%} CI 1.02-2.26, P = 0.04), and pregnancy rate (RR = 1.74, 95{\%} CI 1.20-2.52, P = 0.004). In conclusion, the existing evidence suggests that testicular sperm is better than ejaculated sperm for ICSI in male with cryptozoospermia.",
author = "Kang, {Yi No} and Hsiao, {Ya Wen} and Chen, {Chien Yu} and Wu, {Chien Chih}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-26280-0",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testicular sperm is superior to ejaculated sperm for ICSI in cryptozoospermia

T2 - An update systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Kang, Yi No

AU - Hsiao, Ya Wen

AU - Chen, Chien Yu

AU - Wu, Chien Chih

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is well established and provides patients with severely impaired sperm quality with an opportunity to father a child. However, previous studies do not clearly indicate whether male with cryptozoospermia should use testicular sperm or ejaculated sperm for ICSI. The newest systematic review of this topic also gave a controversial conclusion that was based on incorrect pooling result. Moreover, two clinical studies published after the systematic review. In the present update systematic review and meta-analysis, a comprehensive citation search for relevant studies was performed using the Cochrane library databases, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science up to September 2017. The search returned 313 records, in which six studies were included in quantitative synthesis. These studies involved 578 male infertility patients who had undergone 761 ICSI cycles. The risk ratios favour fresh testicular sperm for good quality embryo rate (1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30, P = 0.005), implantation rate (95% CI 1.02-2.26, P = 0.04), and pregnancy rate (RR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.20-2.52, P = 0.004). In conclusion, the existing evidence suggests that testicular sperm is better than ejaculated sperm for ICSI in male with cryptozoospermia.

AB - Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is well established and provides patients with severely impaired sperm quality with an opportunity to father a child. However, previous studies do not clearly indicate whether male with cryptozoospermia should use testicular sperm or ejaculated sperm for ICSI. The newest systematic review of this topic also gave a controversial conclusion that was based on incorrect pooling result. Moreover, two clinical studies published after the systematic review. In the present update systematic review and meta-analysis, a comprehensive citation search for relevant studies was performed using the Cochrane library databases, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science up to September 2017. The search returned 313 records, in which six studies were included in quantitative synthesis. These studies involved 578 male infertility patients who had undergone 761 ICSI cycles. The risk ratios favour fresh testicular sperm for good quality embryo rate (1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30, P = 0.005), implantation rate (95% CI 1.02-2.26, P = 0.04), and pregnancy rate (RR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.20-2.52, P = 0.004). In conclusion, the existing evidence suggests that testicular sperm is better than ejaculated sperm for ICSI in male with cryptozoospermia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047215722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047215722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-26280-0

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-26280-0

M3 - Review article

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 7874

ER -