Temperature monitoring in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter using the linear ablation technique

Zu Chi Wen, Shih Ann Chen, Ching Tai Tai, Chern En Chiang, Shih Huang Lee, Yi Jen Chen, Wen Chung Yu, Jin Long Huang, Mau Song Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Information about temperature and impedance monitoring during radiofrequency catheter linear ablation of atrial flutter has not been reported. We proposed that a radiofrequency catheter ablation system using a closed-loop temperature control model could decrease the incidence of coagulum formation and shorten the radiation exposure and procedure times compared with those found in a power control model. Methods and Results: Forty patients (8 women and 32 men; mean age 64 ± 7 years) with atrial flutter were referred for radiofrequency ablation. The patients were randomized into two groups: group I patients underwent radiofrequency catheter linear ablation of atrial flutter using a power control of energy output model; and group II patients underwent the closed-loop temperature control model with a target electrode temperature of 70°C. As compared with group II, group I patients had a higher incidence of coagulum formation (12% vs 2%, P <0.05), temperature shutdown (11% vs 0%, P <0.01), and impedance shutdown (16% vs 3%, P <0.01), more radiofrequency applications (7 ± 3 vs 4 ± 2, P <0.01), and longer procedure time (100 ± 25 vs 75 ± 23 minutes, P <0.05) and radiation exposure time (31 ± 10 vs 20 ± 7 minutes, P <0.05) required for successful ablation. Larger deviations of temperature (9.0° ± 2.4°C vs 5.0° ± 1.2°C, P <0.0001) and impedance (9.2 ± 2.6 Ω vs 5.3 ± 1.6 Ω, P <0.0001) were also found in group I patients compared with those in group II. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a closed-loop temperature control model could facilitate the effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrial flutter circuit by decreasing coagulum formation, temperature and impedance shutdown, and procedure and radiation exposure times.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1050-1057
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume7
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ablation Techniques
Atrial Flutter
Catheter Ablation
Temperature
Electric Impedance
Incidence
Electrodes

Keywords

  • atrial flutter
  • catheter ablation
  • radiofrequency
  • temperature control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Temperature monitoring in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter using the linear ablation technique. / Wen, Zu Chi; Chen, Shih Ann; Tai, Ching Tai; Chiang, Chern En; Lee, Shih Huang; Chen, Yi Jen; Yu, Wen Chung; Huang, Jin Long; Chang, Mau Song.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Vol. 7, No. 11, 1996, p. 1050-1057.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wen, ZC, Chen, SA, Tai, CT, Chiang, CE, Lee, SH, Chen, YJ, Yu, WC, Huang, JL & Chang, MS 1996, 'Temperature monitoring in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter using the linear ablation technique', Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1050-1057.
Wen, Zu Chi ; Chen, Shih Ann ; Tai, Ching Tai ; Chiang, Chern En ; Lee, Shih Huang ; Chen, Yi Jen ; Yu, Wen Chung ; Huang, Jin Long ; Chang, Mau Song. / Temperature monitoring in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter using the linear ablation technique. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 1996 ; Vol. 7, No. 11. pp. 1050-1057.
@article{632d09d158ec4187a35ef16c902022c3,
title = "Temperature monitoring in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter using the linear ablation technique",
abstract = "Introduction: Information about temperature and impedance monitoring during radiofrequency catheter linear ablation of atrial flutter has not been reported. We proposed that a radiofrequency catheter ablation system using a closed-loop temperature control model could decrease the incidence of coagulum formation and shorten the radiation exposure and procedure times compared with those found in a power control model. Methods and Results: Forty patients (8 women and 32 men; mean age 64 ± 7 years) with atrial flutter were referred for radiofrequency ablation. The patients were randomized into two groups: group I patients underwent radiofrequency catheter linear ablation of atrial flutter using a power control of energy output model; and group II patients underwent the closed-loop temperature control model with a target electrode temperature of 70°C. As compared with group II, group I patients had a higher incidence of coagulum formation (12{\%} vs 2{\%}, P <0.05), temperature shutdown (11{\%} vs 0{\%}, P <0.01), and impedance shutdown (16{\%} vs 3{\%}, P <0.01), more radiofrequency applications (7 ± 3 vs 4 ± 2, P <0.01), and longer procedure time (100 ± 25 vs 75 ± 23 minutes, P <0.05) and radiation exposure time (31 ± 10 vs 20 ± 7 minutes, P <0.05) required for successful ablation. Larger deviations of temperature (9.0° ± 2.4°C vs 5.0° ± 1.2°C, P <0.0001) and impedance (9.2 ± 2.6 Ω vs 5.3 ± 1.6 Ω, P <0.0001) were also found in group I patients compared with those in group II. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a closed-loop temperature control model could facilitate the effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrial flutter circuit by decreasing coagulum formation, temperature and impedance shutdown, and procedure and radiation exposure times.",
keywords = "atrial flutter, catheter ablation, radiofrequency, temperature control",
author = "Wen, {Zu Chi} and Chen, {Shih Ann} and Tai, {Ching Tai} and Chiang, {Chern En} and Lee, {Shih Huang} and Chen, {Yi Jen} and Yu, {Wen Chung} and Huang, {Jin Long} and Chang, {Mau Song}",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1050--1057",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology",
issn = "1045-3873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temperature monitoring in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter using the linear ablation technique

AU - Wen, Zu Chi

AU - Chen, Shih Ann

AU - Tai, Ching Tai

AU - Chiang, Chern En

AU - Lee, Shih Huang

AU - Chen, Yi Jen

AU - Yu, Wen Chung

AU - Huang, Jin Long

AU - Chang, Mau Song

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Introduction: Information about temperature and impedance monitoring during radiofrequency catheter linear ablation of atrial flutter has not been reported. We proposed that a radiofrequency catheter ablation system using a closed-loop temperature control model could decrease the incidence of coagulum formation and shorten the radiation exposure and procedure times compared with those found in a power control model. Methods and Results: Forty patients (8 women and 32 men; mean age 64 ± 7 years) with atrial flutter were referred for radiofrequency ablation. The patients were randomized into two groups: group I patients underwent radiofrequency catheter linear ablation of atrial flutter using a power control of energy output model; and group II patients underwent the closed-loop temperature control model with a target electrode temperature of 70°C. As compared with group II, group I patients had a higher incidence of coagulum formation (12% vs 2%, P <0.05), temperature shutdown (11% vs 0%, P <0.01), and impedance shutdown (16% vs 3%, P <0.01), more radiofrequency applications (7 ± 3 vs 4 ± 2, P <0.01), and longer procedure time (100 ± 25 vs 75 ± 23 minutes, P <0.05) and radiation exposure time (31 ± 10 vs 20 ± 7 minutes, P <0.05) required for successful ablation. Larger deviations of temperature (9.0° ± 2.4°C vs 5.0° ± 1.2°C, P <0.0001) and impedance (9.2 ± 2.6 Ω vs 5.3 ± 1.6 Ω, P <0.0001) were also found in group I patients compared with those in group II. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a closed-loop temperature control model could facilitate the effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrial flutter circuit by decreasing coagulum formation, temperature and impedance shutdown, and procedure and radiation exposure times.

AB - Introduction: Information about temperature and impedance monitoring during radiofrequency catheter linear ablation of atrial flutter has not been reported. We proposed that a radiofrequency catheter ablation system using a closed-loop temperature control model could decrease the incidence of coagulum formation and shorten the radiation exposure and procedure times compared with those found in a power control model. Methods and Results: Forty patients (8 women and 32 men; mean age 64 ± 7 years) with atrial flutter were referred for radiofrequency ablation. The patients were randomized into two groups: group I patients underwent radiofrequency catheter linear ablation of atrial flutter using a power control of energy output model; and group II patients underwent the closed-loop temperature control model with a target electrode temperature of 70°C. As compared with group II, group I patients had a higher incidence of coagulum formation (12% vs 2%, P <0.05), temperature shutdown (11% vs 0%, P <0.01), and impedance shutdown (16% vs 3%, P <0.01), more radiofrequency applications (7 ± 3 vs 4 ± 2, P <0.01), and longer procedure time (100 ± 25 vs 75 ± 23 minutes, P <0.05) and radiation exposure time (31 ± 10 vs 20 ± 7 minutes, P <0.05) required for successful ablation. Larger deviations of temperature (9.0° ± 2.4°C vs 5.0° ± 1.2°C, P <0.0001) and impedance (9.2 ± 2.6 Ω vs 5.3 ± 1.6 Ω, P <0.0001) were also found in group I patients compared with those in group II. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a closed-loop temperature control model could facilitate the effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrial flutter circuit by decreasing coagulum formation, temperature and impedance shutdown, and procedure and radiation exposure times.

KW - atrial flutter

KW - catheter ablation

KW - radiofrequency

KW - temperature control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029956372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029956372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1050

EP - 1057

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

SN - 1045-3873

IS - 11

ER -