Synchronous and 'Early' metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma: Analysis of prognosis and current trends

H. S. Chen, S. M. Sheen-Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the accuracy of preoperative diagnostic examinations and determined whether patients with synchronous colorectal cancers differ from patients with a single colorectal malignancy in clinicopathologic factors, the possibility of early metachronous colorectal cancer, and postoperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 1,780 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from 1987 to 1993 was performed. We divided patients into three groups: Group 1, single colorectal adenocarcinoma; Group 2, synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma; and Group 3, early metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: There were 52 cases (3 percent) in Group 2 and 13 cases (1 percent) in Group 3 (<3 years from the index colorectal cancer operation). Differences in age, gender, and cancer-free rate among the three groups did not reached statistical significance. Compared with cancers in Group 1, significantly more proximal tumor locations and early cancer stage were noted for the second and third cancers in Group 2. In Group 3 a significantly more proximal tumor site was noted for the index colorectal cancer but cancer stage showed no significant difference from cancers in Group 1. Better histologic type was also noted in the index and second cancers in Group 2 than in cancers in Group 1. There was a higher incidence of associated benign adenoma in Group 2 (35 vs. 15 percent in Group 1). The positivity rate of Group 2 was significantly higher by preoperative colonoscopy (71 percent) and incidental findings at surgery (58 percent) than barium enema examination (30 percent). CONCLUSION: Preoperative barium enema examination was an unsatisfactory tool for detecting synchronous tumors. Preoperative colonoscopy demonstrated a higher positivity rate, but it still failed to detect nearly 30 percent of cases with synchronous tumors. Intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum could detect nearly 60 percent of unexpected synchronous tumors. We believe both colonoscopy and intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum are crucial to the early detection of synchronous colorectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1093-1099
Number of pages7
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume43
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Adenocarcinoma
Neoplasms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Colonoscopy
Second Primary Neoplasms
Palpation
Incidental Findings
Adenoma
Incidence

Keywords

  • Barium enema examination
  • Colonoscopy
  • Early metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma
  • Synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Synchronous and 'Early' metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma : Analysis of prognosis and current trends. / Chen, H. S.; Sheen-Chen, S. M.

In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Vol. 43, No. 8, 01.01.2000, p. 1093-1099.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68b3589725394a2fa70b28c6d61242ac,
title = "Synchronous and 'Early' metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma: Analysis of prognosis and current trends",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We evaluated the accuracy of preoperative diagnostic examinations and determined whether patients with synchronous colorectal cancers differ from patients with a single colorectal malignancy in clinicopathologic factors, the possibility of early metachronous colorectal cancer, and postoperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 1,780 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from 1987 to 1993 was performed. We divided patients into three groups: Group 1, single colorectal adenocarcinoma; Group 2, synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma; and Group 3, early metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: There were 52 cases (3 percent) in Group 2 and 13 cases (1 percent) in Group 3 (<3 years from the index colorectal cancer operation). Differences in age, gender, and cancer-free rate among the three groups did not reached statistical significance. Compared with cancers in Group 1, significantly more proximal tumor locations and early cancer stage were noted for the second and third cancers in Group 2. In Group 3 a significantly more proximal tumor site was noted for the index colorectal cancer but cancer stage showed no significant difference from cancers in Group 1. Better histologic type was also noted in the index and second cancers in Group 2 than in cancers in Group 1. There was a higher incidence of associated benign adenoma in Group 2 (35 vs. 15 percent in Group 1). The positivity rate of Group 2 was significantly higher by preoperative colonoscopy (71 percent) and incidental findings at surgery (58 percent) than barium enema examination (30 percent). CONCLUSION: Preoperative barium enema examination was an unsatisfactory tool for detecting synchronous tumors. Preoperative colonoscopy demonstrated a higher positivity rate, but it still failed to detect nearly 30 percent of cases with synchronous tumors. Intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum could detect nearly 60 percent of unexpected synchronous tumors. We believe both colonoscopy and intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum are crucial to the early detection of synchronous colorectal cancer.",
keywords = "Barium enema examination, Colonoscopy, Early metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma, Synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma",
author = "Chen, {H. S.} and Sheen-Chen, {S. M.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF02236556",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1093--1099",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synchronous and 'Early' metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma

T2 - Analysis of prognosis and current trends

AU - Chen, H. S.

AU - Sheen-Chen, S. M.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: We evaluated the accuracy of preoperative diagnostic examinations and determined whether patients with synchronous colorectal cancers differ from patients with a single colorectal malignancy in clinicopathologic factors, the possibility of early metachronous colorectal cancer, and postoperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 1,780 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from 1987 to 1993 was performed. We divided patients into three groups: Group 1, single colorectal adenocarcinoma; Group 2, synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma; and Group 3, early metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: There were 52 cases (3 percent) in Group 2 and 13 cases (1 percent) in Group 3 (<3 years from the index colorectal cancer operation). Differences in age, gender, and cancer-free rate among the three groups did not reached statistical significance. Compared with cancers in Group 1, significantly more proximal tumor locations and early cancer stage were noted for the second and third cancers in Group 2. In Group 3 a significantly more proximal tumor site was noted for the index colorectal cancer but cancer stage showed no significant difference from cancers in Group 1. Better histologic type was also noted in the index and second cancers in Group 2 than in cancers in Group 1. There was a higher incidence of associated benign adenoma in Group 2 (35 vs. 15 percent in Group 1). The positivity rate of Group 2 was significantly higher by preoperative colonoscopy (71 percent) and incidental findings at surgery (58 percent) than barium enema examination (30 percent). CONCLUSION: Preoperative barium enema examination was an unsatisfactory tool for detecting synchronous tumors. Preoperative colonoscopy demonstrated a higher positivity rate, but it still failed to detect nearly 30 percent of cases with synchronous tumors. Intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum could detect nearly 60 percent of unexpected synchronous tumors. We believe both colonoscopy and intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum are crucial to the early detection of synchronous colorectal cancer.

AB - PURPOSE: We evaluated the accuracy of preoperative diagnostic examinations and determined whether patients with synchronous colorectal cancers differ from patients with a single colorectal malignancy in clinicopathologic factors, the possibility of early metachronous colorectal cancer, and postoperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 1,780 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from 1987 to 1993 was performed. We divided patients into three groups: Group 1, single colorectal adenocarcinoma; Group 2, synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma; and Group 3, early metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: There were 52 cases (3 percent) in Group 2 and 13 cases (1 percent) in Group 3 (<3 years from the index colorectal cancer operation). Differences in age, gender, and cancer-free rate among the three groups did not reached statistical significance. Compared with cancers in Group 1, significantly more proximal tumor locations and early cancer stage were noted for the second and third cancers in Group 2. In Group 3 a significantly more proximal tumor site was noted for the index colorectal cancer but cancer stage showed no significant difference from cancers in Group 1. Better histologic type was also noted in the index and second cancers in Group 2 than in cancers in Group 1. There was a higher incidence of associated benign adenoma in Group 2 (35 vs. 15 percent in Group 1). The positivity rate of Group 2 was significantly higher by preoperative colonoscopy (71 percent) and incidental findings at surgery (58 percent) than barium enema examination (30 percent). CONCLUSION: Preoperative barium enema examination was an unsatisfactory tool for detecting synchronous tumors. Preoperative colonoscopy demonstrated a higher positivity rate, but it still failed to detect nearly 30 percent of cases with synchronous tumors. Intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum could detect nearly 60 percent of unexpected synchronous tumors. We believe both colonoscopy and intraoperative palpation of the whole colorectum are crucial to the early detection of synchronous colorectal cancer.

KW - Barium enema examination

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Early metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma

KW - Synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033869026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033869026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02236556

DO - 10.1007/BF02236556

M3 - Article

C2 - 10950007

AN - SCOPUS:0033869026

VL - 43

SP - 1093

EP - 1099

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 8

ER -